{"title":"低剂量口服姜黄素对轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎的缓解诱导无效:来自随机双盲安慰剂对照试验的结果。","authors":"Saurabh Kedia, Vikram Bhatia, Sandeep Thareja, Sushil Garg, Venigalla Pratap Mouli, Sawan Bopanna, Veena Tiwari, Govind Makharia, Vineet Ahuja","doi":"10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the role of oral curcumin in inducing clinical remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing the remission inducing effect of oral curcumin and mesalamine 2.4 g with placebo and mesalamine 2.4 g in patients of ulcerative colitis with mild to moderate severity was conducted from January 2003 to March 2005. The included patients received 1 capsule thrice a day of placebo or curcumin (150 mg) for 8 wk. Patients were evaluated clinically and endoscopically at 0, 4 and 8 wk. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 8 wk and secondary outcomes were clinical response, mucosal healing and treatment failure at 8 wk. The primary analysis was intention to treat worst case scenario (ITT-WCS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 patients with UC, 62 patients (curcumin: 29, placebo: 33) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomized at baseline. Of these, 21 patients did not complete the trial, 41 patients (curcumin: 16, placebo: 25) finally completed 8 wk. There was no significant difference in rates of clinical remission (31.3% <i>vs</i> 27.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.75), clinical response (20.7% <i>vs</i> 36.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.18), mucosal healing (34.5% <i>vs</i> 30.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.72), and treatment failure (25% <i>vs</i> 18.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.59) between curcumin and placebo at 8 wk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low dose oral curcumin at a dose of 450 mg/d was ineffective in inducing remission in mild to moderate cases of UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23755,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"8 2","pages":"147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low dose oral curcumin is not effective in induction of remission in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: Results from a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Saurabh Kedia, Vikram Bhatia, Sandeep Thareja, Sushil Garg, Venigalla Pratap Mouli, Sawan Bopanna, Veena Tiwari, Govind Makharia, Vineet Ahuja\",\"doi\":\"10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the role of oral curcumin in inducing clinical remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing the remission inducing effect of oral curcumin and mesalamine 2.4 g with placebo and mesalamine 2.4 g in patients of ulcerative colitis with mild to moderate severity was conducted from January 2003 to March 2005. The included patients received 1 capsule thrice a day of placebo or curcumin (150 mg) for 8 wk. Patients were evaluated clinically and endoscopically at 0, 4 and 8 wk. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 8 wk and secondary outcomes were clinical response, mucosal healing and treatment failure at 8 wk. The primary analysis was intention to treat worst case scenario (ITT-WCS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 patients with UC, 62 patients (curcumin: 29, placebo: 33) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomized at baseline. Of these, 21 patients did not complete the trial, 41 patients (curcumin: 16, placebo: 25) finally completed 8 wk. There was no significant difference in rates of clinical remission (31.3% <i>vs</i> 27.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.75), clinical response (20.7% <i>vs</i> 36.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.18), mucosal healing (34.5% <i>vs</i> 30.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.72), and treatment failure (25% <i>vs</i> 18.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.59) between curcumin and placebo at 8 wk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low dose oral curcumin at a dose of 450 mg/d was ineffective in inducing remission in mild to moderate cases of UC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"147-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i2.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56
摘要
目的:评价口服姜黄素对轻中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者临床缓解的作用。方法:2003年1月至2005年3月,采用前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验,比较口服姜黄素和2.4 g美沙拉胺与安慰剂和2.4 g美沙拉胺对轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎患者的缓解效果。纳入的患者接受1胶囊安慰剂或姜黄素(150毫克),每天三次,持续8周。在第0、4和8周对患者进行临床和内窥镜检查。8周时的主要终点是临床缓解,8周时的次要终点是临床反应、粘膜愈合和治疗失败。主要分析是治疗最坏情况(ITT-WCS)的意向。结果:在300例UC患者中,62例患者(姜黄素:29例,安慰剂:33例)符合纳入标准,并在基线时随机分组。其中,21名患者没有完成试验,41名患者(姜黄素:16名,安慰剂:25名)最终完成8周。8周时,姜黄素组和安慰剂组的临床缓解率(31.3% vs 27.3%, P = 0.75)、临床缓解率(20.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.18)、粘膜愈合率(34.5% vs 30.3%, P = 0.72)和治疗失败率(25% vs 18.5%, P = 0.59)均无显著差异。结论:低剂量口服姜黄素450mg /d对轻、中度UC患者的缓解无效。
Low dose oral curcumin is not effective in induction of remission in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: Results from a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial.
Aim: To evaluate the role of oral curcumin in inducing clinical remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods: A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing the remission inducing effect of oral curcumin and mesalamine 2.4 g with placebo and mesalamine 2.4 g in patients of ulcerative colitis with mild to moderate severity was conducted from January 2003 to March 2005. The included patients received 1 capsule thrice a day of placebo or curcumin (150 mg) for 8 wk. Patients were evaluated clinically and endoscopically at 0, 4 and 8 wk. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 8 wk and secondary outcomes were clinical response, mucosal healing and treatment failure at 8 wk. The primary analysis was intention to treat worst case scenario (ITT-WCS).
Results: Of 300 patients with UC, 62 patients (curcumin: 29, placebo: 33) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomized at baseline. Of these, 21 patients did not complete the trial, 41 patients (curcumin: 16, placebo: 25) finally completed 8 wk. There was no significant difference in rates of clinical remission (31.3% vs 27.3%, P = 0.75), clinical response (20.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.18), mucosal healing (34.5% vs 30.3%, P = 0.72), and treatment failure (25% vs 18.5%, P = 0.59) between curcumin and placebo at 8 wk.
Conclusion: Low dose oral curcumin at a dose of 450 mg/d was ineffective in inducing remission in mild to moderate cases of UC.