Jacqueline McGinley, Deborah P Waldrop, Brian Clemency
{"title":"紧急医疗服务提供者对智障人士临终决策的看法。","authors":"Jacqueline McGinley, Deborah P Waldrop, Brian Clemency","doi":"10.1111/jar.12363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are often called to rapidly determine and act upon patients' wishes for end-of-life care. People with intellectual disabilities are living increasingly longer with complex conditions leading to international calls for person-centred advance care planning. Yet, best estimates suggest that very few people with intellectual disabilities document their wishes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory-descriptive study incorporated mixed methods to analyse data collected consecutively (surveys, n = 239; interviews, n = 48) with EMS providers from five agencies. Data were subjected to a sequential quantitative-qualitative analysis applying a critical discourse analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that 62.7% had treated a person with intellectual disability who had medical orders directing end-of-life care. Three themes (provider familiarity, organizational processes, sociocultural context) offer insights about how medical orders inform EMS providers during calls involving people with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple contexts influence how wishes are documented and care provided to people with intellectual disabilities near life's end.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"30 6","pages":"1057-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12363","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency medical services providers' perspective of end-of-life decision making for people with intellectual disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline McGinley, Deborah P Waldrop, Brian Clemency\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.12363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are often called to rapidly determine and act upon patients' wishes for end-of-life care. People with intellectual disabilities are living increasingly longer with complex conditions leading to international calls for person-centred advance care planning. Yet, best estimates suggest that very few people with intellectual disabilities document their wishes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory-descriptive study incorporated mixed methods to analyse data collected consecutively (surveys, n = 239; interviews, n = 48) with EMS providers from five agencies. Data were subjected to a sequential quantitative-qualitative analysis applying a critical discourse analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that 62.7% had treated a person with intellectual disability who had medical orders directing end-of-life care. Three themes (provider familiarity, organizational processes, sociocultural context) offer insights about how medical orders inform EMS providers during calls involving people with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple contexts influence how wishes are documented and care provided to people with intellectual disabilities near life's end.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"1057-1064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12363\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emergency medical services providers' perspective of end-of-life decision making for people with intellectual disabilities.
Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are often called to rapidly determine and act upon patients' wishes for end-of-life care. People with intellectual disabilities are living increasingly longer with complex conditions leading to international calls for person-centred advance care planning. Yet, best estimates suggest that very few people with intellectual disabilities document their wishes.
Methods: This exploratory-descriptive study incorporated mixed methods to analyse data collected consecutively (surveys, n = 239; interviews, n = 48) with EMS providers from five agencies. Data were subjected to a sequential quantitative-qualitative analysis applying a critical discourse analysis framework.
Results: Findings indicate that 62.7% had treated a person with intellectual disability who had medical orders directing end-of-life care. Three themes (provider familiarity, organizational processes, sociocultural context) offer insights about how medical orders inform EMS providers during calls involving people with intellectual disabilities.
Conclusion: Multiple contexts influence how wishes are documented and care provided to people with intellectual disabilities near life's end.