Angela Agostinelli, Ilaria Marcantoni, Elisa Moretti, Agnese Sbrollini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini
{"title":"无创胎儿心电图第一部分:Pan-Tompkins算法适应胎儿r -峰识别。","authors":"Angela Agostinelli, Ilaria Marcantoni, Elisa Moretti, Agnese Sbrollini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini","doi":"10.2174/1874120701711010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the \"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\" and to the \"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applied to \"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 <i>vs.</i> 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to \"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 <i>vs.</i> 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 <i>vs.</i> 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 <i>vs.</i> 0.47, P=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010017","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part I: Pan-Tompkins' Algorithm Adaptation to Fetal R-peak Identification.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Agostinelli, Ilaria Marcantoni, Elisa Moretti, Agnese Sbrollini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the \\\"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\\\" and to the \\\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\\\" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applied to \\\"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\\\", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 <i>vs.</i> 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to \\\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\\\" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 <i>vs.</i> 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 <i>vs.</i> 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 <i>vs.</i> 0.47, P=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31
摘要
背景:间接胎儿心电图比直接胎儿心电图更好,因为它无创,也适用于妊娠末期,除了分娩。然而,前者受到噪声的强烈影响,因此即使是r峰检测(这对胎儿心率评估和后续处理程序至关重要)也是具有挑战性的。一些胎儿研究已经应用了Pan-Tompkins算法,然而,该算法最初是为成人应用而设计的。因此,本工作评估了Pan-Tompkins算法对胎儿应用的适用性,并提出了胎儿调整和优化的建议。方法:将Pan-Tompkins算法及其改进版本应用于“腹部和直接胎儿心电图数据库”和Physionet的“无创胎儿心电图数据库”。通过计算阳性预测值、灵敏度和F1评分来量化r峰检测的准确性。结果:应用于“腹部和直接胎儿心电图数据库”时,改进的胎儿Pan-Tompkins算法的准确率明显高于标准(阳性预测值:0.94 vs. 0.79;灵敏度:0.95 vs. 0.80;F1评分:0.94 vs. 0.79;Pvs. 0.55, Pvs. 0.46, P=0.23;F1评分:0.60 vs. 0.47, P=0.11)。结论:在胎儿心电图的间接应用中,改进的胎儿Pan-Tompkins算法优于标准算法,因为它为心率评估和后续处理提供了更高的r峰检测精度。
Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part I: Pan-Tompkins' Algorithm Adaptation to Fetal R-peak Identification.
Background: Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.
Method: Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the "Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database" and to the "Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.
Results: When applied to "Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 vs. 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 vs. 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 vs. 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to "Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 vs. 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 vs. 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 vs. 0.47, P=0.11).
Conclusion: In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.