无创胎儿心电图第一部分:Pan-Tompkins算法适应胎儿r -峰识别。

Q3 Medicine Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2017-03-31 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874120701711010017
Angela Agostinelli, Ilaria Marcantoni, Elisa Moretti, Agnese Sbrollini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini
{"title":"无创胎儿心电图第一部分:Pan-Tompkins算法适应胎儿r -峰识别。","authors":"Angela Agostinelli,&nbsp;Ilaria Marcantoni,&nbsp;Elisa Moretti,&nbsp;Agnese Sbrollini,&nbsp;Sandro Fioretti,&nbsp;Francesco Di Nardo,&nbsp;Laura Burattini","doi":"10.2174/1874120701711010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the \"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\" and to the \"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applied to \"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 <i>vs.</i> 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to \"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 <i>vs.</i> 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 <i>vs.</i> 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 <i>vs.</i> 0.47, P=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010017","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part I: Pan-Tompkins' Algorithm Adaptation to Fetal R-peak Identification.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Agostinelli,&nbsp;Ilaria Marcantoni,&nbsp;Elisa Moretti,&nbsp;Agnese Sbrollini,&nbsp;Sandro Fioretti,&nbsp;Francesco Di Nardo,&nbsp;Laura Burattini\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the \\\"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\\\" and to the \\\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\\\" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When applied to \\\"Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database\\\", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 <i>vs.</i> 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 <i>vs.</i> 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to \\\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database\\\" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 <i>vs.</i> 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 <i>vs.</i> 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 <i>vs.</i> 0.47, P=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

背景:间接胎儿心电图比直接胎儿心电图更好,因为它无创,也适用于妊娠末期,除了分娩。然而,前者受到噪声的强烈影响,因此即使是r峰检测(这对胎儿心率评估和后续处理程序至关重要)也是具有挑战性的。一些胎儿研究已经应用了Pan-Tompkins算法,然而,该算法最初是为成人应用而设计的。因此,本工作评估了Pan-Tompkins算法对胎儿应用的适用性,并提出了胎儿调整和优化的建议。方法:将Pan-Tompkins算法及其改进版本应用于“腹部和直接胎儿心电图数据库”和Physionet的“无创胎儿心电图数据库”。通过计算阳性预测值、灵敏度和F1评分来量化r峰检测的准确性。结果:应用于“腹部和直接胎儿心电图数据库”时,改进的胎儿Pan-Tompkins算法的准确率明显高于标准(阳性预测值:0.94 vs. 0.79;灵敏度:0.95 vs. 0.80;F1评分:0.94 vs. 0.79;Pvs. 0.55, Pvs. 0.46, P=0.23;F1评分:0.60 vs. 0.47, P=0.11)。结论:在胎儿心电图的间接应用中,改进的胎儿Pan-Tompkins算法优于标准算法,因为它为心率评估和后续处理提供了更高的r峰检测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part I: Pan-Tompkins' Algorithm Adaptation to Fetal R-peak Identification.

Background: Indirect fetal electrocardiography is preferable to direct fetal electrocardiography because of being noninvasive and is applicable also during the end of pregnancy, besides labor. Still, the former is strongly affected by noise so that even R-peak detection (which is essential for fetal heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing procedures) is challenging. Some fetal studies have applied the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm that, however, was originally designed for adult applications. Thus, this work evaluated the Pan-Tompkins' algorithm suitability for fetal applications, and proposed fetal adjustments and optimizations to improve it.

Method: Both Pan-Tompkins' algorithm and its improved version were applied to the "Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database" and to the "Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database" of Physionet. R-peak detection accuracy was quantified by computation of positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score.

Results: When applied to "Abdominal and Direct Fetal Electrocardiogram Database", the accuracy of the improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was significantly higher than the standard (positive-predictive value: 0.94 vs. 0.79; sensitivity: 0.95 vs. 0.80; F1 score: 0.94 vs. 0.79; P<0.05 in all cases) on indirect fetal electrocardiograms, whereas both methods performed similarly on direct fetal electrocardiograms (positive-predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score all close to 1). Improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm was found to be superior to the standard also when applied to "Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Database" (positive-predictive value: 0.68 vs. 0.55, P<0.05; sensitivity: 0.56 vs. 0.46, P=0.23; F1 score: 0.60 vs. 0.47, P=0.11).

Conclusion: In indirect fetal electrocardiographic applications, improved fetal Pan-Tompkins' algorithm is to be preferred over the standard, since it provides higher R-peak detection accuracy for heart-rate evaluations and subsequent processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
F.E.M. Stress-Investigation of Scolios Apex. Characterization of the F-box Proteins FBXW2 and FBXL14 in the Initiation of Bone Regeneration in Transplants given to Nude Mice. Natural Sensations Evoked in Distal Extremities Using Surface Electrical Stimulation. Investigating the Conformation of S100β Protein Under Physiological Parameters Using Computational Modeling: A Clue for Rational Drug Design. Reliability, Learnability and Efficiency of Two Tools for Cement Crowns Retrieval in Dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1