Angela Agostinelli, Agnese Sbrollini, Luca Burattini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini
{"title":"无创胎儿心电图第二部分:信号去噪的分段节拍调制方法。","authors":"Angela Agostinelli, Agnese Sbrollini, Luca Burattini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini","doi":"10.2174/1874120701711010025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetal well-being evaluation may be accomplished by monitoring cardiac activity through fetal electrocardiography. Direct fetal electrocardiography (acquired through scalp electrodes) is the gold standard but its invasiveness limits its clinical applicability. Instead, clinical use of indirect fetal electrocardiography (acquired through abdominal electrodes) is limited by its poor signal quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method to denoise indirect fetal electrocardiograms in order to achieve a signal-quality at least comparable to the direct ones.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Direct and indirect recordings, simultaneously acquired from 5 pregnant women during labor, were filtered with the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method and correlated in order to assess their morphological correspondence. Signal-to-noise ratio was used to quantify their quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amplitude was higher in direct than indirect fetal electrocardiograms (median:104 µV <i>vs.</i> 22 µV; P=7.66·10<sup>-4</sup>), whereas noise was comparable (median:70 µV <i>vs.</i> 49 µV, P=0.45). Moreover, fetal electrocardiogram amplitude was significantly higher than affecting noise in direct recording (P=3.17·10<sup>-2</sup>) and significantly in indirect recording (P=1.90·10<sup>-3</sup>). Consequently, signal-to-noise ratio was initially higher for direct than indirect recordings (median:3.3 dB <i>vs.</i> -2.3 dB; P=3.90·10<sup>-3</sup>), but became lower after denoising of indirect ones (median:9.6 dB; P=9.84·10<sup>-4</sup>). Eventually, direct and indirect recordings were highly correlated (median: ρ=0.78; P<10<sup>-208</sup>), indicating that the two electrocardiograms were morphologically equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Segmented-Beat Modulation Method is particularly useful for denoising of indirect fetal electrocardiogram and may contribute to the spread of this noninvasive technique in the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010025","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part II: Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for Signal Denoising.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Agostinelli, Agnese Sbrollini, Luca Burattini, Sandro Fioretti, Francesco Di Nardo, Laura Burattini\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701711010025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fetal well-being evaluation may be accomplished by monitoring cardiac activity through fetal electrocardiography. Direct fetal electrocardiography (acquired through scalp electrodes) is the gold standard but its invasiveness limits its clinical applicability. Instead, clinical use of indirect fetal electrocardiography (acquired through abdominal electrodes) is limited by its poor signal quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method to denoise indirect fetal electrocardiograms in order to achieve a signal-quality at least comparable to the direct ones.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Direct and indirect recordings, simultaneously acquired from 5 pregnant women during labor, were filtered with the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method and correlated in order to assess their morphological correspondence. Signal-to-noise ratio was used to quantify their quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amplitude was higher in direct than indirect fetal electrocardiograms (median:104 µV <i>vs.</i> 22 µV; P=7.66·10<sup>-4</sup>), whereas noise was comparable (median:70 µV <i>vs.</i> 49 µV, P=0.45). Moreover, fetal electrocardiogram amplitude was significantly higher than affecting noise in direct recording (P=3.17·10<sup>-2</sup>) and significantly in indirect recording (P=1.90·10<sup>-3</sup>). Consequently, signal-to-noise ratio was initially higher for direct than indirect recordings (median:3.3 dB <i>vs.</i> -2.3 dB; P=3.90·10<sup>-3</sup>), but became lower after denoising of indirect ones (median:9.6 dB; P=9.84·10<sup>-4</sup>). Eventually, direct and indirect recordings were highly correlated (median: ρ=0.78; P<10<sup>-208</sup>), indicating that the two electrocardiograms were morphologically equivalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Segmented-Beat Modulation Method is particularly useful for denoising of indirect fetal electrocardiogram and may contribute to the spread of this noninvasive technique in the clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"25-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701711010025\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701711010025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
摘要
背景:胎儿健康评估可以通过胎儿心电图监测心脏活动来完成。直接胎儿心电图(通过头皮电极获得)是金标准,但其侵入性限制了其临床适用性。相反,临床使用间接胎儿心电图(通过腹部电极获得)由于其信号质量差而受到限制。目的:评价分段心跳调制方法对间接胎儿心电图去噪的适用性,以获得至少与直接胎儿心电图相当的信号质量。方法:对5例产妇在分娩过程中同时采集的直接和间接录音,采用分段节拍调制法进行滤波,并进行相关分析,以评估其形态学对应性。信噪比用于量化其质量。结果:直接胎儿心电图幅值高于间接胎儿心电图幅值(中位数:104µV vs. 22µV;P=7.66·10-4),而噪声具有可比性(中位数:70µV vs. 49µV, P=0.45)。直接记录组胎儿心电图振幅显著高于影响噪声组(P=3.17·10-2),间接记录组显著高于影响噪声组(P=1.90·10-3)。因此,直接录音的信噪比最初高于间接录音(中位数:3.3 dB vs. -2.3 dB;P=3.90·10-3),但间接信号去噪后较低(中位数:9.6 dB;4 P = 9.84·打败)。最终,直接和间接记录高度相关(中位数:ρ=0.78;P-208),说明两组心电图在形态学上是相同的。结论:分段心跳调制法对间接胎儿心电图去噪特别有用,可能有助于该无创技术在临床中的推广。
Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography Part II: Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for Signal Denoising.
Background: Fetal well-being evaluation may be accomplished by monitoring cardiac activity through fetal electrocardiography. Direct fetal electrocardiography (acquired through scalp electrodes) is the gold standard but its invasiveness limits its clinical applicability. Instead, clinical use of indirect fetal electrocardiography (acquired through abdominal electrodes) is limited by its poor signal quality.
Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method to denoise indirect fetal electrocardiograms in order to achieve a signal-quality at least comparable to the direct ones.
Method: Direct and indirect recordings, simultaneously acquired from 5 pregnant women during labor, were filtered with the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method and correlated in order to assess their morphological correspondence. Signal-to-noise ratio was used to quantify their quality.
Results: Amplitude was higher in direct than indirect fetal electrocardiograms (median:104 µV vs. 22 µV; P=7.66·10-4), whereas noise was comparable (median:70 µV vs. 49 µV, P=0.45). Moreover, fetal electrocardiogram amplitude was significantly higher than affecting noise in direct recording (P=3.17·10-2) and significantly in indirect recording (P=1.90·10-3). Consequently, signal-to-noise ratio was initially higher for direct than indirect recordings (median:3.3 dB vs. -2.3 dB; P=3.90·10-3), but became lower after denoising of indirect ones (median:9.6 dB; P=9.84·10-4). Eventually, direct and indirect recordings were highly correlated (median: ρ=0.78; P<10-208), indicating that the two electrocardiograms were morphologically equivalent.
Conclusion: Segmented-Beat Modulation Method is particularly useful for denoising of indirect fetal electrocardiogram and may contribute to the spread of this noninvasive technique in the clinical practice.