注射造影剂对静脉形状和磁共振血管造影图像质量的影响。

Magnetic resonance insights Pub Date : 2017-04-20 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178623X17705894
Gregor Jost, Jan Endrikat, Hubertus Pietsch
{"title":"注射造影剂对静脉形状和磁共振血管造影图像质量的影响。","authors":"Gregor Jost,&nbsp;Jan Endrikat,&nbsp;Hubertus Pietsch","doi":"10.1177/1178623X17705894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare injector-based contrast agent (CA) administration with hand injection in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gadobutrol was administered in 6 minipigs with 3 protocols: (a) hand injection (one senior technician), (b) hand injection (6 less-experienced technicians), and (c) power injector administration. The arterial bolus shape was quantified by test bolus measurements. A head and neck MRA was performed for quantitative and qualitative comparison of signal enhancement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly shorter time to peak was observed for protocol C, whereas no significant differences between protocols were found for peak height and bolus width. However, for protocol C, these parameters showed a much lower variation. The MRA revealed a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for injector-based administration. A superimposed strong contrast of the jugular vein was found in 50% of the hand injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injector-based CA administration results in a more standardized bolus shape, a higher vascular contrast, and a more robust visualization of target vessels.</p>","PeriodicalId":74096,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance insights","volume":"10 ","pages":"1178623X17705894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178623X17705894","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality.\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Jost,&nbsp;Jan Endrikat,&nbsp;Hubertus Pietsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1178623X17705894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare injector-based contrast agent (CA) administration with hand injection in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gadobutrol was administered in 6 minipigs with 3 protocols: (a) hand injection (one senior technician), (b) hand injection (6 less-experienced technicians), and (c) power injector administration. The arterial bolus shape was quantified by test bolus measurements. A head and neck MRA was performed for quantitative and qualitative comparison of signal enhancement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly shorter time to peak was observed for protocol C, whereas no significant differences between protocols were found for peak height and bolus width. However, for protocol C, these parameters showed a much lower variation. The MRA revealed a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for injector-based administration. A superimposed strong contrast of the jugular vein was found in 50% of the hand injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injector-based CA administration results in a more standardized bolus shape, a higher vascular contrast, and a more robust visualization of target vessels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance insights\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"1178623X17705894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178623X17705894\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178623X17705894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178623X17705894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:比较注射造影剂(CA)与手注造影剂在磁共振血管造影(MRA)中的应用。方法:6头小型猪采用3种给药方案:(a)手注射(1名高级技术人员),(b)手注射(6名经验不足的技术人员),(c)动力注射给药。动脉丸形通过试验丸测量来量化。进行头颈部磁共振成像,定量和定性比较信号增强。结果:C方案达到峰的时间明显缩短,而不同方案在峰高和丸宽方面无显著差异。然而,对于方案C,这些参数的变化要小得多。MRA显示,基于喷射器给药的信噪比明显更高。在50%的手部注射中发现颈静脉的强烈对比叠加。结论:基于注射器的CA给药导致更标准化的丸形,更高的血管对比度,以及更强大的靶血管可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality.

Objective: To compare injector-based contrast agent (CA) administration with hand injection in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

Methods: Gadobutrol was administered in 6 minipigs with 3 protocols: (a) hand injection (one senior technician), (b) hand injection (6 less-experienced technicians), and (c) power injector administration. The arterial bolus shape was quantified by test bolus measurements. A head and neck MRA was performed for quantitative and qualitative comparison of signal enhancement.

Results: A significantly shorter time to peak was observed for protocol C, whereas no significant differences between protocols were found for peak height and bolus width. However, for protocol C, these parameters showed a much lower variation. The MRA revealed a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for injector-based administration. A superimposed strong contrast of the jugular vein was found in 50% of the hand injections.

Conclusions: Injector-based CA administration results in a more standardized bolus shape, a higher vascular contrast, and a more robust visualization of target vessels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Systemic Amyloidosis. Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium vs Gadobenate Dimeglumine in Patients With Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions: Results of a Clinical Phase III Study. A Correlational Study between Microstructural White Matter Properties and Macrostructural Gray Matter Volume Across Normal Ageing: Conjoint DTI and VBM Analysis. In Vivo MR Imaging of Tumor-Associated Macrophages: The Next Frontier in Cancer Imaging. Trial-Level Regressor Modulation for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Designs Requiring Strict Periodicity of Stimulus Presentations: Illustrated Using a Go/No-Go Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1