牙本质预处理对通用胶粘剂粘接强度的影响。

Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2017-03-27 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273
Claudio Poggio, Riccardo Beltrami, Marco Colombo, Marco Chiesa, Andrea Scribante
{"title":"牙本质预处理对通用胶粘剂粘接强度的影响。","authors":"Claudio Poggio,&nbsp;Riccardo Beltrami,&nbsp;Marco Colombo,&nbsp;Marco Chiesa,&nbsp;Andrea Scribante","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of the present study was to compare bond strength of different universal adhesives under three different testing conditions: when no pretreatment was applied, after 37% phosphoric acid etching and after glycine application. <b>Materials and methods:</b> One hundred and fifty bovine permanent mandibular incisors were used as a substitute for human teeth. Five different universal adhesives were tested: Futurabond M+, Scotchbond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, G-Premio BOND, Peak Universal Bond. The adhesive systems were applied following each manufacturer's instructions. The teeth were randomly assigned to three different dentin surface pretreatments: no pretreatment agent (control), 37% phosphoric acid etching, glycine pretreatment. The specimens were placed in a universal testing machine in order to measure and compare bond strength values. <b>Results:</b> The Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney test were applied to assess significant differences among the groups. Dentin pretreatments provided different bond strength values for the adhesives tested, while similar values were registered in groups without dentin pretreatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> In the present report, dentin surface pretreatment did not provide significant differences in shear bond strength values of almost all groups. Acid pretreatment lowered bond strength values of Futurabond and Peak Universal Adhesives, whereas glycine pretreatment increased bond strength values of G Praemio Bond adhesive system.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"3 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Poggio,&nbsp;Riccardo Beltrami,&nbsp;Marco Colombo,&nbsp;Marco Chiesa,&nbsp;Andrea Scribante\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of the present study was to compare bond strength of different universal adhesives under three different testing conditions: when no pretreatment was applied, after 37% phosphoric acid etching and after glycine application. <b>Materials and methods:</b> One hundred and fifty bovine permanent mandibular incisors were used as a substitute for human teeth. Five different universal adhesives were tested: Futurabond M+, Scotchbond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, G-Premio BOND, Peak Universal Bond. The adhesive systems were applied following each manufacturer's instructions. The teeth were randomly assigned to three different dentin surface pretreatments: no pretreatment agent (control), 37% phosphoric acid etching, glycine pretreatment. The specimens were placed in a universal testing machine in order to measure and compare bond strength values. <b>Results:</b> The Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney test were applied to assess significant differences among the groups. Dentin pretreatments provided different bond strength values for the adhesives tested, while similar values were registered in groups without dentin pretreatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> In the present report, dentin surface pretreatment did not provide significant differences in shear bond strength values of almost all groups. Acid pretreatment lowered bond strength values of Futurabond and Peak Universal Adhesives, whereas glycine pretreatment increased bond strength values of G Praemio Bond adhesive system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1305273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较三种不同的测试条件下,不同的通用胶粘剂的粘结强度:未预处理时,37%磷酸蚀刻和甘氨酸应用后。材料与方法:用150只牛恒颌门牙代替人牙。测试了五种不同的通用粘合剂:Futurabond M+, Scotchbond universal, Clearfil universal Bond, G-Premio Bond, Peak universal Bond。粘合剂系统按照每个制造商的说明进行应用。牙本质表面预处理:无预处理剂(对照组)、37%磷酸蚀刻、甘氨酸预处理。将试件置于万能试验机中,以测量和比较粘结强度值。结果:采用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和Mann-Whitney检验评估组间显著性差异。牙本质预处理组黏合剂的黏结强度值不同,而未进行牙本质预处理组黏结强度值相近。结论:在本报告中,牙本质表面预处理几乎所有组的剪切粘结强度值均无显著差异。酸预处理降低了Futurabond和Peak Universal Adhesives的结合强度值,而甘氨酸预处理提高了G Praemio bond粘合剂体系的结合强度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of dentin pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesives.

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare bond strength of different universal adhesives under three different testing conditions: when no pretreatment was applied, after 37% phosphoric acid etching and after glycine application. Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty bovine permanent mandibular incisors were used as a substitute for human teeth. Five different universal adhesives were tested: Futurabond M+, Scotchbond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, G-Premio BOND, Peak Universal Bond. The adhesive systems were applied following each manufacturer's instructions. The teeth were randomly assigned to three different dentin surface pretreatments: no pretreatment agent (control), 37% phosphoric acid etching, glycine pretreatment. The specimens were placed in a universal testing machine in order to measure and compare bond strength values. Results: The Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney test were applied to assess significant differences among the groups. Dentin pretreatments provided different bond strength values for the adhesives tested, while similar values were registered in groups without dentin pretreatment. Conclusions: In the present report, dentin surface pretreatment did not provide significant differences in shear bond strength values of almost all groups. Acid pretreatment lowered bond strength values of Futurabond and Peak Universal Adhesives, whereas glycine pretreatment increased bond strength values of G Praemio Bond adhesive system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-demineralization effect of desensitizer containing copolymer and sodium fluoride on root dentin - a transverse microradiographic study. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth treated with a regenerative endodontic protocol. Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin. The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of dental glass-ionomer cements: a review. An in vitro model to assess effects of a desensitising agent on bacterial biofilm formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1