Eloá Aguiar Gazola, Marcos Augusto Rego, William Cunha Brandt, Maria Beatriz Freitas D'Arce, Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni
{"title":"硅烷和甲基丙烯酸酯复合材料在侵蚀和磨损过程中的显微硬度评价。","authors":"Eloá Aguiar Gazola, Marcos Augusto Rego, William Cunha Brandt, Maria Beatriz Freitas D'Arce, Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni","doi":"10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. <i>Material and methods</i>: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the type of composite (G1-G4, MC; G5-G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 - Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 - Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 - Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 - Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion. <i>Results</i>: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"1 2-4","pages":"66-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes.\",\"authors\":\"Eloá Aguiar Gazola, Marcos Augusto Rego, William Cunha Brandt, Maria Beatriz Freitas D'Arce, Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. <i>Material and methods</i>: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to the type of composite (G1-G4, MC; G5-G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 - Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 - Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 - Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 - Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion. <i>Results</i>: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (<i>p</i> < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"1 2-4\",\"pages\":\"66-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1084884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microhardness evaluation of silorane and methacrylate composites submitted to erosion and abrasion processes.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of methacrylate (MC) and silorane (SC) composites after being submitted to erosion and abrasion processes. Material and methods: Forty samples were made with each composite: MC and SC. The samples were divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the type of composite (G1-G4, MC; G5-G8, SC) and the beverages involved in the erosion process (G1 and G5 - Control (C), without erosion, with abrasion; G2 and G6 - Orange Juice (OJ), abrasion; G3 and G7 - Smirnoff Ice® (SI), abrasion; G4 and G8 - Gatorade® (GA), abrasion). The KHN test was performed 24 h after the last cycle of erosion/abrasion. Results: The MC groups showed smaller KHN values for the SI group (p < 0.05) when compared to the Control and OJ groups; however, for the SC groups, no differences were found (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Methacrylate composite when submitted to acidic beverages erosive challenge combined with abrasive process might alter its surface microhardness. However, the beverages used in the present study were not able to interfere in silorane composite surface microhardness.