两种正统与科学:比较反思。

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Isis Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1086/688417
Yakov M Rabkin
{"title":"两种正统与科学:比较反思。","authors":"Yakov M Rabkin","doi":"10.1086/688417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay offers a comparative discussion of attitudes to science within Jewish\nand Christian Orthodoxies. When it touches on the contemporary period, it deals\nwith different varieties of Jewish Orthodoxy rather than the more liberal Jewish denominations.\nDebates about science and religion, rarely involving active—let alone\nprominent—scientists, take place within both religious traditions. The issues can be\nroughly divided in two categories—cognitive and social—even though the two may\noccasionally intersect. The first category, apparently more important for the Greek Orthodox,\naddresses issues of the content of research and of its influence on ethics. Social\nissues constitute the other important aspect of the interaction between religion and\nmodernity: Is it desirable to spend time on anything but religious studies and to engage\nin modern society at all, lest its more permissive norms and ideas corrupt proper behavior?\nThis aspect seems to preoccupy Jewish Orthodoxy more than Greek Orthodoxy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"107 3","pages":"583-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/688417","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Orthodoxies and Science:\\nComparative Reflections.\",\"authors\":\"Yakov M Rabkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/688417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This essay offers a comparative discussion of attitudes to science within Jewish\\nand Christian Orthodoxies. When it touches on the contemporary period, it deals\\nwith different varieties of Jewish Orthodoxy rather than the more liberal Jewish denominations.\\nDebates about science and religion, rarely involving active—let alone\\nprominent—scientists, take place within both religious traditions. The issues can be\\nroughly divided in two categories—cognitive and social—even though the two may\\noccasionally intersect. The first category, apparently more important for the Greek Orthodox,\\naddresses issues of the content of research and of its influence on ethics. Social\\nissues constitute the other important aspect of the interaction between religion and\\nmodernity: Is it desirable to spend time on anything but religious studies and to engage\\nin modern society at all, lest its more permissive norms and ideas corrupt proper behavior?\\nThis aspect seems to preoccupy Jewish Orthodoxy more than Greek Orthodoxy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isis\",\"volume\":\"107 3\",\"pages\":\"583-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/688417\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/688417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/688417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章提供了犹太教和基督教正统对科学的态度的比较讨论。当它涉及到当代的时候,它处理的是不同种类的犹太正统派,而不是更自由的犹太教派。关于科学和宗教的辩论,很少涉及活跃的科学家,更不用说杰出的科学家了,发生在两种宗教传统中。这些问题大致可以分为两类——认知和社会——尽管这两者偶尔会交叉。第一类显然对希腊东正教更为重要,涉及研究内容及其对伦理的影响问题。社会问题构成了宗教与现代性互动的另一个重要方面:除了宗教研究和参与现代社会之外,是否值得把时间花在任何事情上,以免其更宽容的规范和思想腐蚀了正当的行为?这方面似乎比希腊正教更关注犹太正教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Orthodoxies and Science: Comparative Reflections.

This essay offers a comparative discussion of attitudes to science within Jewish and Christian Orthodoxies. When it touches on the contemporary period, it deals with different varieties of Jewish Orthodoxy rather than the more liberal Jewish denominations. Debates about science and religion, rarely involving active—let alone prominent—scientists, take place within both religious traditions. The issues can be roughly divided in two categories—cognitive and social—even though the two may occasionally intersect. The first category, apparently more important for the Greek Orthodox, addresses issues of the content of research and of its influence on ethics. Social issues constitute the other important aspect of the interaction between religion and modernity: Is it desirable to spend time on anything but religious studies and to engage in modern society at all, lest its more permissive norms and ideas corrupt proper behavior? This aspect seems to preoccupy Jewish Orthodoxy more than Greek Orthodoxy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
期刊最新文献
:A Concise History of Veterinary Medicine :Code: From Information Theory to French Theory :Looking for Longitude: A Cultural History :Flora’s Fieldworkers: Women and Botany in Nineteenth-Century Canada :Technocratic Visions: Engineers, Technology, and Society in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1