{"title":"为期四周的“高生活低训练”计划通过改善运动员在次极限运动时的能量代谢来提高3000米和5000米计时赛成绩。","authors":"Hun-Young Park, Sungho Kim, Sang-Seok Nam","doi":"10.20463/jenb.2017.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of a 4-week living high training low (LHTL) versus a living low training low (LLTL) program on energy metabolism during submaximal exercise and 3000-m and 5000-m time trial (TT) in athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male athletes (n = 20) were randomly assigned to the LLTL (n = 10, living at 1000 m and training at 700-1330 m) and LHTL (n = 10, living at simulated 3000 m and training at 700-1330 m) groups. We compared energy metabolisms during submaximal exercise on a treadmill and aerobic exercise performance (3000 m and 5000 m TT) before and after 4 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, the LHTL group demonstrated enhanced energy metabolism during submaximal exercise via significant interaction (time × group) in heart rate, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide excretion; these variables were significantly decreased in the LHTL group compared with the LLTL group. Additionally, both training groups revealed significantly decreased blood lactate levels during submaximal exercise, 3000 m TT, and 5000 m TT but significant interactions (time × group) in the 3000 m and 5000 m TT. Thus, the LHTL group demonstrated greater improvements in 3000 m and 5000 m TT than the LLTL group via significant interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that 4-week LHTL intervention enhances 3000 m and 5000 m TT by improving energy metabolism during submaximal exercise. The proposed LHTL intervention in this study is a novel and effective method for improving aerobic exercise performance in male athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Nutrition & Biochemistry","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20463/jenb.2017.0060","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four-week \\\"living high training low\\\" program enhances 3000-m and 5000-m time trials by improving energy metabolism during submaximal exercise in athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Hun-Young Park, Sungho Kim, Sang-Seok Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.20463/jenb.2017.0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of a 4-week living high training low (LHTL) versus a living low training low (LLTL) program on energy metabolism during submaximal exercise and 3000-m and 5000-m time trial (TT) in athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male athletes (n = 20) were randomly assigned to the LLTL (n = 10, living at 1000 m and training at 700-1330 m) and LHTL (n = 10, living at simulated 3000 m and training at 700-1330 m) groups. We compared energy metabolisms during submaximal exercise on a treadmill and aerobic exercise performance (3000 m and 5000 m TT) before and after 4 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, the LHTL group demonstrated enhanced energy metabolism during submaximal exercise via significant interaction (time × group) in heart rate, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide excretion; these variables were significantly decreased in the LHTL group compared with the LLTL group. Additionally, both training groups revealed significantly decreased blood lactate levels during submaximal exercise, 3000 m TT, and 5000 m TT but significant interactions (time × group) in the 3000 m and 5000 m TT. Thus, the LHTL group demonstrated greater improvements in 3000 m and 5000 m TT than the LLTL group via significant interactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that 4-week LHTL intervention enhances 3000 m and 5000 m TT by improving energy metabolism during submaximal exercise. The proposed LHTL intervention in this study is a novel and effective method for improving aerobic exercise performance in male athletes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exercise Nutrition & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20463/jenb.2017.0060\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exercise Nutrition & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2017.0060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Nutrition & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.2017.0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
目的:本研究旨在确定4周生活高训练低(LHTL)与生活低训练低(LLTL)计划对运动员在次极限运动和3000米、5000米计时赛(TT)期间能量代谢的影响。方法:将20名男性运动员随机分为LLTL组(10名,生活海拔1000米,训练海拔700 ~ 1330米)和LHTL组(10名,模拟生活海拔3000米,训练海拔700 ~ 1330米)。我们比较了4周训练前后在跑步机上进行亚极限运动和有氧运动(3000米和5000米TT)时的能量代谢。结果:正如预期的那样,LHTL组在亚极限运动期间通过心率、耗氧量和二氧化碳排泄的显著相互作用(时间×组)增强了能量代谢;与LLTL组相比,LHTL组这些变量均显著降低。此外,两个训练组在次极限运动、3000米和5000米训练期间的血乳酸水平均显著降低,但在3000米和5000米训练期间存在显著的相互作用(时间×组)。因此,通过显著的相互作用,LHTL组在3000 m和5000 m TT上表现出比LLTL组更大的改善。结论:我们的研究结果表明,4周的LHTL干预通过改善亚极限运动时的能量代谢来提高3000 m和5000 m TT。本研究提出的LHTL干预是提高男性运动员有氧运动成绩的一种新颖有效的方法。
Four-week "living high training low" program enhances 3000-m and 5000-m time trials by improving energy metabolism during submaximal exercise in athletes.
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of a 4-week living high training low (LHTL) versus a living low training low (LLTL) program on energy metabolism during submaximal exercise and 3000-m and 5000-m time trial (TT) in athletes.
Methods: Male athletes (n = 20) were randomly assigned to the LLTL (n = 10, living at 1000 m and training at 700-1330 m) and LHTL (n = 10, living at simulated 3000 m and training at 700-1330 m) groups. We compared energy metabolisms during submaximal exercise on a treadmill and aerobic exercise performance (3000 m and 5000 m TT) before and after 4 weeks of training.
Results: As expected, the LHTL group demonstrated enhanced energy metabolism during submaximal exercise via significant interaction (time × group) in heart rate, oxygen consumption, and carbon dioxide excretion; these variables were significantly decreased in the LHTL group compared with the LLTL group. Additionally, both training groups revealed significantly decreased blood lactate levels during submaximal exercise, 3000 m TT, and 5000 m TT but significant interactions (time × group) in the 3000 m and 5000 m TT. Thus, the LHTL group demonstrated greater improvements in 3000 m and 5000 m TT than the LLTL group via significant interactions.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that 4-week LHTL intervention enhances 3000 m and 5000 m TT by improving energy metabolism during submaximal exercise. The proposed LHTL intervention in this study is a novel and effective method for improving aerobic exercise performance in male athletes.