社交网络作为非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的预测因素。

Ernest Alema-Mensah, Selina A Smith, Mechelle Claridy, Victor Ede, Benjamin Ansa, Daniel S Blumenthal
{"title":"社交网络作为非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的预测因素。","authors":"Ernest Alema-Mensah,&nbsp;Selina A Smith,&nbsp;Mechelle Claridy,&nbsp;Victor Ede,&nbsp;Benjamin Ansa,&nbsp;Daniel S Blumenthal","doi":"10.21633/jgpha.6.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%-33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Individual social networks can reduce emotional and/or logistical barriers to health-promoting but distasteful procedures such as CRC screening. The aim of this study was to examine social network interactions, and their impact on CRC screening among African Americans. We hypothesized a positive association between social network index (SNI) scores and CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a community intervention trial with four arms, we previously demonstrated the efficacy of a small group educational intervention to promote CRC screening among African Americans. This intervention outperformed a one-on-one educational intervention, a reduced out-of-pocket expense intervention, and a control condition. In the present analysis, we compared the SNI scores for participants in the small group intervention cohort with a comparison group comprised of the other three cohorts. Social networks were assessed using the Social Network Index developed by Cohen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Small group participants had a significantly higher network diversity score (Mean difference 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-1.31; p=0.0017) than the comparison group. In the second component of the SNI score - the number of people talked to over a two week period - the small group intervention cohort also scored significantly higher than the comparison group. (Mean difference, 9.29; 95% CI, 3.963-14.6266; p=0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that social interaction and support was at least partially responsible for the relatively high post-intervention screening rate in the small group intervention participants. Education in small groups could foster strong social networks. Strong and positive network diversity and a large number of people in social networks may enhance CRC screening rates among African Americans.</p>","PeriodicalId":73981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","volume":"6 3","pages":"369-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515378/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Ernest Alema-Mensah,&nbsp;Selina A Smith,&nbsp;Mechelle Claridy,&nbsp;Victor Ede,&nbsp;Benjamin Ansa,&nbsp;Daniel S Blumenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.21633/jgpha.6.306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%-33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Individual social networks can reduce emotional and/or logistical barriers to health-promoting but distasteful procedures such as CRC screening. The aim of this study was to examine social network interactions, and their impact on CRC screening among African Americans. We hypothesized a positive association between social network index (SNI) scores and CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a community intervention trial with four arms, we previously demonstrated the efficacy of a small group educational intervention to promote CRC screening among African Americans. This intervention outperformed a one-on-one educational intervention, a reduced out-of-pocket expense intervention, and a control condition. In the present analysis, we compared the SNI scores for participants in the small group intervention cohort with a comparison group comprised of the other three cohorts. Social networks were assessed using the Social Network Index developed by Cohen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Small group participants had a significantly higher network diversity score (Mean difference 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-1.31; p=0.0017) than the comparison group. In the second component of the SNI score - the number of people talked to over a two week period - the small group intervention cohort also scored significantly higher than the comparison group. (Mean difference, 9.29; 95% CI, 3.963-14.6266; p=0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that social interaction and support was at least partially responsible for the relatively high post-intervention screening rate in the small group intervention participants. Education in small groups could foster strong social networks. Strong and positive network diversity and a large number of people in social networks may enhance CRC screening rates among African Americans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"369-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21633/jgpha.6.306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21633/jgpha.6.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:早期发现可使结直肠癌(CRC)死亡率降低15%-33%,广泛推荐对50岁开始的平均风险成人进行筛查。非裔美国人的结肠直肠癌死亡率高于白人,而筛查率略低。个人社交网络可以减少情感和/或后勤障碍,以促进健康,但令人反感的程序,如CRC筛查。本研究的目的是研究社会网络互动及其对非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的影响。我们假设社交网络指数(SNI)得分与CRC筛查之间存在正相关。方法:在一项四组社区干预试验中,我们先前证明了小群体教育干预对促进非裔美国人CRC筛查的有效性。这种干预优于一对一的教育干预、减少自付费用的干预和控制条件。在本分析中,我们将小组干预队列参与者的SNI评分与由其他三个队列组成的对照组进行了比较。社会网络使用科恩开发的社会网络指数进行评估。结果:小组参与者的网络多样性得分显著高于小组参与者(平均差值0.71;95% ci, 0.12-1.31;P =0.0017)高于对照组。在SNI评分的第二个组成部分——在两周内与之交谈的人数——小组干预组的得分也明显高于对照组。(平均差值为9.29;95% ci, 3.963-14.6266;p = 0.0004)。结论:研究结果表明,社会互动和支持至少是小群体干预参与者相对较高的干预后筛查率的部分原因。小团体教育可以培养强大的社会网络。强大和积极的网络多样性以及社交网络中的大量人员可能会提高非裔美国人的CRC筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Background: Early detection can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality by 15%-33%, and screening is widely recommended for average-risk adults beginning at age 50 years. Colorectal cancer mortality rates are higher in African Americans than in whites, while screening rates are somewhat lower. Individual social networks can reduce emotional and/or logistical barriers to health-promoting but distasteful procedures such as CRC screening. The aim of this study was to examine social network interactions, and their impact on CRC screening among African Americans. We hypothesized a positive association between social network index (SNI) scores and CRC screening.

Methods: In a community intervention trial with four arms, we previously demonstrated the efficacy of a small group educational intervention to promote CRC screening among African Americans. This intervention outperformed a one-on-one educational intervention, a reduced out-of-pocket expense intervention, and a control condition. In the present analysis, we compared the SNI scores for participants in the small group intervention cohort with a comparison group comprised of the other three cohorts. Social networks were assessed using the Social Network Index developed by Cohen.

Results: Small group participants had a significantly higher network diversity score (Mean difference 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-1.31; p=0.0017) than the comparison group. In the second component of the SNI score - the number of people talked to over a two week period - the small group intervention cohort also scored significantly higher than the comparison group. (Mean difference, 9.29; 95% CI, 3.963-14.6266; p=0.0004).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that social interaction and support was at least partially responsible for the relatively high post-intervention screening rate in the small group intervention participants. Education in small groups could foster strong social networks. Strong and positive network diversity and a large number of people in social networks may enhance CRC screening rates among African Americans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health Communications Trial with a Resistant Population to Increase Public Health Compliance during a Pandemic An analysis of Georgia mothers who gave birth in 2015 and 2016 without receiving prenatal care Role of Community-level Health Behaviors and Social Determinants of Health in Preventable Hospitalizations Elderly Educated Blacks and the influence of exercise identity, self-determination, and social determinants of health on physical activity Perception of Health Care Access in Rural Georgia: Findings From a Community Health Needs Assessment Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1