格拉斯哥“深端”链接工人研究协议:对社会经济剥夺地区复杂需求患者的社会处方干预的准实验评估。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2017-01-25 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2017.7.102
Stewart W Mercer, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Lesley Grant, Nai Rui Chng, Catherine A O'Donnell, Mhairi Mackenzie, Alex McConnachie, Andisheh Bakhshi, Sally Wyke
{"title":"格拉斯哥“深端”链接工人研究协议:对社会经济剥夺地区复杂需求患者的社会处方干预的准实验评估。","authors":"Stewart W Mercer,&nbsp;Bridie Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;Lesley Grant,&nbsp;Nai Rui Chng,&nbsp;Catherine A O'Donnell,&nbsp;Mhairi Mackenzie,&nbsp;Alex McConnachie,&nbsp;Andisheh Bakhshi,&nbsp;Sally Wyke","doi":"10.15256/joc.2017.7.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>'Social prescribing' can be used to link patients with complex needs to local (non-medical) community resources. The 'Deep End' Links Worker Programme is being tested in general practices serving deprived populations in Glasgow, Scotland.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the implementation and impact of the intervention at patient and practice levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Study design</i>: Quasi-experimental outcome evaluation with embedded theory-driven process evaluation in 15 practices randomized to receive the intervention or not. <i>Complex intervention</i>: Comprising a practice development fund, a practice-based community links practitioner (CLP), and management support. It aims to link patients to local community organizations and enhance practices' social prescribing capacity. <i>Study population</i>: For intervention practices, staff and adult patients involved in referral to a CLP, and a sample of community organization staff. For comparison practices, all staff and a random sample of adult patients. <i>Sample size</i>: 286 intervention and 484 comparator patients. <i>Outcomes</i>: Primary patient outcome is health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary patient outcomes include capacity, depression/anxiety, self-esteem, and healthcare utilization. Practice outcome measures include team climate, job satisfaction, morale, and burnout. Outcomes measured at baseline and 9 months. <i>Processes</i>: Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the programme and possible mechanisms through which outcomes are achieved. <i>Analysis plan</i>: For outcome, intention-to-treat analysis with differences between groups tested using mixed-effects regression models. For process, case-study approach with thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This evaluation will provide new evidence about the implementation and impact of social prescribing by general practices serving patients with complex needs living in areas of high deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2017.7.102","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Glasgow 'Deep End' Links Worker Study Protocol: a quasi-experimental evaluation of a social prescribing intervention for patients with complex needs in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation.\",\"authors\":\"Stewart W Mercer,&nbsp;Bridie Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;Lesley Grant,&nbsp;Nai Rui Chng,&nbsp;Catherine A O'Donnell,&nbsp;Mhairi Mackenzie,&nbsp;Alex McConnachie,&nbsp;Andisheh Bakhshi,&nbsp;Sally Wyke\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2017.7.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>'Social prescribing' can be used to link patients with complex needs to local (non-medical) community resources. The 'Deep End' Links Worker Programme is being tested in general practices serving deprived populations in Glasgow, Scotland.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the implementation and impact of the intervention at patient and practice levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>Study design</i>: Quasi-experimental outcome evaluation with embedded theory-driven process evaluation in 15 practices randomized to receive the intervention or not. <i>Complex intervention</i>: Comprising a practice development fund, a practice-based community links practitioner (CLP), and management support. It aims to link patients to local community organizations and enhance practices' social prescribing capacity. <i>Study population</i>: For intervention practices, staff and adult patients involved in referral to a CLP, and a sample of community organization staff. For comparison practices, all staff and a random sample of adult patients. <i>Sample size</i>: 286 intervention and 484 comparator patients. <i>Outcomes</i>: Primary patient outcome is health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary patient outcomes include capacity, depression/anxiety, self-esteem, and healthcare utilization. Practice outcome measures include team climate, job satisfaction, morale, and burnout. Outcomes measured at baseline and 9 months. <i>Processes</i>: Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the programme and possible mechanisms through which outcomes are achieved. <i>Analysis plan</i>: For outcome, intention-to-treat analysis with differences between groups tested using mixed-effects regression models. For process, case-study approach with thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This evaluation will provide new evidence about the implementation and impact of social prescribing by general practices serving patients with complex needs living in areas of high deprivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2017.7.102\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2017.7.102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2017.7.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

背景:“社会处方”可用于将有复杂需求的患者与当地(非医疗)社区资源联系起来。“深端”连接工人计划正在为苏格兰格拉斯哥的贫困人口进行一般实践测试。目的:评估干预措施在患者和实践层面的实施和影响。方法:研究设计:采用嵌入理论驱动过程评价法对15例实践进行准实验结果评价。复杂干预:包括实践发展基金、基于实践的从业者联系社区(CLP)和管理支持。它旨在将患者与当地社区组织联系起来,并增强实践的社会处方能力。研究人群:干预实践,涉及转介到CLP的工作人员和成年患者,以及社区组织工作人员的样本。为比较做法,所有工作人员和成年患者随机抽样。样本量:干预组286例,对照组484例。结果:患者的主要结果是健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)。次要患者结局包括能力、抑郁/焦虑、自尊和医疗保健利用。实践结果的衡量标准包括团队氛围、工作满意度、士气和倦怠。在基线和9个月时测量结果。进程:实施方案的障碍和促进因素以及实现成果的可能机制。分析方案:对于结果,使用混合效应回归模型对组间差异进行意向治疗分析。在过程中,采用专题分析的案例研究方法。讨论:这一评价将为社会处方的实施和影响提供新的证据,通过为生活在高度贫困地区有复杂需求的患者提供服务的全科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Glasgow 'Deep End' Links Worker Study Protocol: a quasi-experimental evaluation of a social prescribing intervention for patients with complex needs in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation.

Background: 'Social prescribing' can be used to link patients with complex needs to local (non-medical) community resources. The 'Deep End' Links Worker Programme is being tested in general practices serving deprived populations in Glasgow, Scotland.

Objectives: To assess the implementation and impact of the intervention at patient and practice levels.

Methods: Study design: Quasi-experimental outcome evaluation with embedded theory-driven process evaluation in 15 practices randomized to receive the intervention or not. Complex intervention: Comprising a practice development fund, a practice-based community links practitioner (CLP), and management support. It aims to link patients to local community organizations and enhance practices' social prescribing capacity. Study population: For intervention practices, staff and adult patients involved in referral to a CLP, and a sample of community organization staff. For comparison practices, all staff and a random sample of adult patients. Sample size: 286 intervention and 484 comparator patients. Outcomes: Primary patient outcome is health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary patient outcomes include capacity, depression/anxiety, self-esteem, and healthcare utilization. Practice outcome measures include team climate, job satisfaction, morale, and burnout. Outcomes measured at baseline and 9 months. Processes: Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the programme and possible mechanisms through which outcomes are achieved. Analysis plan: For outcome, intention-to-treat analysis with differences between groups tested using mixed-effects regression models. For process, case-study approach with thematic analysis.

Discussion: This evaluation will provide new evidence about the implementation and impact of social prescribing by general practices serving patients with complex needs living in areas of high deprivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiences of older primary care patients with multimorbidity and their caregivers in navigating the healthcare system: A qualitative study protocol. Bi-directional association between depression and HF: An electronic health records-based cohort study. The association between clusters of chronic conditions and psychological well-being in younger and older people-A cross-sectional, population-based study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark. The complexity of caregiving for community-living older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative study. Synergistic effects of hip/knee osteoarthritis and comorbidities on mobility and self-care limitations among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis of the Oxford pain, Activity and Lifestyle study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1