一种决策分析方法,量化年龄和合并症对从医疗中获得显著益处的可能性的影响。

Journal of comorbidity Pub Date : 2017-05-10 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.15256/joc.2017.7.93
Stephen P Fitzgerald, Nigel G Bean, Ravi P Ruberu
{"title":"一种决策分析方法,量化年龄和合并症对从医疗中获得显著益处的可能性的影响。","authors":"Stephen P Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Nigel G Bean,&nbsp;Ravi P Ruberu","doi":"10.15256/joc.2017.7.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The external validity, or generalizability, of trials and guidelines has been considered poor in the context of multiple morbidity. How multiple morbidity might affect the magnitude of benefit of a given treatment, and thereby external validity, has had little study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a method of decision analysis to quantify the effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving a given magnitude of treatment benefit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a method to calculate probabilistically the effect of all of a patient's comorbidities on their underlying utility, or well-being, at a future time point. From this, we derived a distribution of possible magnitudes of treatment benefit at that future time point. We then expressed this distribution as the probability of deriving at least a given magnitude of treatment benefit. To demonstrate the applicability of this method of decision analysis, we applied it to the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in a geriatric population of 50 individuals. We highlighted the results of four of these individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This method of analysis provided individualized quantifications of the effect of age and comorbidity on the probability of treatment benefit. The average probability of deriving a benefit, of at least 50% of the magnitude of benefit available to an individual without comorbidity, was only 0.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving significant treatment benefits can be quantified for any individual. Even without consideration of other factors affecting external validity, these effects may be sufficient to guide decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"7 1","pages":"50-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2017.7.93","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method of decision analysis quantifying the effects of age and comorbidities on the probability of deriving significant benefit from medical treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Nigel G Bean,&nbsp;Ravi P Ruberu\",\"doi\":\"10.15256/joc.2017.7.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The external validity, or generalizability, of trials and guidelines has been considered poor in the context of multiple morbidity. How multiple morbidity might affect the magnitude of benefit of a given treatment, and thereby external validity, has had little study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a method of decision analysis to quantify the effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving a given magnitude of treatment benefit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We developed a method to calculate probabilistically the effect of all of a patient's comorbidities on their underlying utility, or well-being, at a future time point. From this, we derived a distribution of possible magnitudes of treatment benefit at that future time point. We then expressed this distribution as the probability of deriving at least a given magnitude of treatment benefit. To demonstrate the applicability of this method of decision analysis, we applied it to the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in a geriatric population of 50 individuals. We highlighted the results of four of these individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This method of analysis provided individualized quantifications of the effect of age and comorbidity on the probability of treatment benefit. The average probability of deriving a benefit, of at least 50% of the magnitude of benefit available to an individual without comorbidity, was only 0.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving significant treatment benefits can be quantified for any individual. Even without consideration of other factors affecting external validity, these effects may be sufficient to guide decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"50-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15256/joc.2017.7.93\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2017.7.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15256/joc.2017.7.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在多发性疾病的背景下,试验和指南的外部有效性或普遍性被认为很差。多重发病如何影响特定治疗的获益程度,从而影响外部有效性,这方面的研究很少。目的:提供一种决策分析方法,量化年龄和合并症对获得一定程度治疗效益的可能性的影响。设计:我们开发了一种方法,以概率计算所有患者的合并症对其潜在效用或福祉在未来时间点的影响。由此,我们得出了在未来时间点治疗获益可能幅度的分布。然后,我们将这种分布表示为至少获得一定程度治疗效益的概率。为了证明这种决策分析方法的适用性,我们将其应用于50例老年人群的高胆固醇血症治疗。我们强调了其中四个人的结果。结果:该分析方法提供了年龄和合并症对治疗获益概率影响的个体化量化。获得至少50%的无合并症个体可获得的获益的平均概率仅为0.8%。结论:年龄和合并症对任何个体获得显著治疗益处的影响是可以量化的。即使不考虑影响外部有效性的其他因素,这些影响也可能足以指导决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A method of decision analysis quantifying the effects of age and comorbidities on the probability of deriving significant benefit from medical treatments.

Background: The external validity, or generalizability, of trials and guidelines has been considered poor in the context of multiple morbidity. How multiple morbidity might affect the magnitude of benefit of a given treatment, and thereby external validity, has had little study.

Objective: To provide a method of decision analysis to quantify the effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving a given magnitude of treatment benefit.

Design: We developed a method to calculate probabilistically the effect of all of a patient's comorbidities on their underlying utility, or well-being, at a future time point. From this, we derived a distribution of possible magnitudes of treatment benefit at that future time point. We then expressed this distribution as the probability of deriving at least a given magnitude of treatment benefit. To demonstrate the applicability of this method of decision analysis, we applied it to the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in a geriatric population of 50 individuals. We highlighted the results of four of these individuals.

Results: This method of analysis provided individualized quantifications of the effect of age and comorbidity on the probability of treatment benefit. The average probability of deriving a benefit, of at least 50% of the magnitude of benefit available to an individual without comorbidity, was only 0.8%.

Conclusion: The effects of age and comorbidity on the probability of deriving significant treatment benefits can be quantified for any individual. Even without consideration of other factors affecting external validity, these effects may be sufficient to guide decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiences of older primary care patients with multimorbidity and their caregivers in navigating the healthcare system: A qualitative study protocol. Bi-directional association between depression and HF: An electronic health records-based cohort study. The association between clusters of chronic conditions and psychological well-being in younger and older people-A cross-sectional, population-based study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark. The complexity of caregiving for community-living older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative study. Synergistic effects of hip/knee osteoarthritis and comorbidities on mobility and self-care limitations among older adults: Cross-sectional analysis of the Oxford pain, Activity and Lifestyle study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1