全科患者对陪伴进行亲密体检的态度。

Q3 Medicine Australian family physician Pub Date : 2017-11-01
Lucie Stanford, Andrew Bonney, Rowena Ivers, Judy Mullan, Warren Rich, Bridget Dijkmans-Hadley
{"title":"全科患者对陪伴进行亲密体检的态度。","authors":"Lucie Stanford,&nbsp;Andrew Bonney,&nbsp;Rowena Ivers,&nbsp;Judy Mullan,&nbsp;Warren Rich,&nbsp;Bridget Dijkmans-Hadley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this article is to investigate patients' attitudes to the use of chaperones for intimate physical examinations (IPEs) in a sample of Australian general practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of adult patients from 13 randomly selected general practices in regional New South Wales was conducted between September and November 2012. Generalised linear mixed models were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 780 surveys distributed, 687 (88%) were returned; the age range was 18-91 years and 356 (52%) were from female patients. Most women had never had a chaperone present for a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear (82.6%). Between 23% and 33% of respondents preferred a chaperone with their usual general practitioner (GP) across IPEs and gender of the respondents. The odds of preference for a chaperone were significantly less with a GP whom the respondents did not know well, compared with their usual GP, for a Pap smear (female) or genital examination (male).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Individualised discussion regarding chaperone use for IPEs is warranted, especially with patients seeing their usual GP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8653,"journal":{"name":"Australian family physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' attitudes towards chaperone use for intimate physical examinations in general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Lucie Stanford,&nbsp;Andrew Bonney,&nbsp;Rowena Ivers,&nbsp;Judy Mullan,&nbsp;Warren Rich,&nbsp;Bridget Dijkmans-Hadley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this article is to investigate patients' attitudes to the use of chaperones for intimate physical examinations (IPEs) in a sample of Australian general practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of adult patients from 13 randomly selected general practices in regional New South Wales was conducted between September and November 2012. Generalised linear mixed models were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 780 surveys distributed, 687 (88%) were returned; the age range was 18-91 years and 356 (52%) were from female patients. Most women had never had a chaperone present for a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear (82.6%). Between 23% and 33% of respondents preferred a chaperone with their usual general practitioner (GP) across IPEs and gender of the respondents. The odds of preference for a chaperone were significantly less with a GP whom the respondents did not know well, compared with their usual GP, for a Pap smear (female) or genital examination (male).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Individualised discussion regarding chaperone use for IPEs is warranted, especially with patients seeing their usual GP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian family physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian family physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian family physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这篇文章的目的是调查患者的态度使用伴侣进行亲密体检(IPEs)在一个样本的澳大利亚全科医生。方法:对2012年9月至11月在新南威尔士州地区随机抽取的13家全科诊所的成年患者进行横断面调查。采用广义线性混合模型进行分析。结果:共发放问卷780份,回复率687份(88%);年龄18 ~ 91岁,女性356例(52%)。大多数妇女在做巴氏涂片检查时从未有伴侣在场(82.6%)。23%至33%的受访者更喜欢与他们通常的全科医生(GP)监护,无论他们的IPEs和性别。与他们通常的全科医生相比,被调查者不太了解的全科医生对监护人的偏好明显更少,因为巴氏涂片检查(女性)或生殖器检查(男性)。讨论:对于IPEs中伴侣的使用进行个体化的讨论是必要的,特别是患者去看他们通常的全科医生时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' attitudes towards chaperone use for intimate physical examinations in general practice.

Background: The objective of this article is to investigate patients' attitudes to the use of chaperones for intimate physical examinations (IPEs) in a sample of Australian general practices.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of adult patients from 13 randomly selected general practices in regional New South Wales was conducted between September and November 2012. Generalised linear mixed models were used for analysis.

Results: Of 780 surveys distributed, 687 (88%) were returned; the age range was 18-91 years and 356 (52%) were from female patients. Most women had never had a chaperone present for a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear (82.6%). Between 23% and 33% of respondents preferred a chaperone with their usual general practitioner (GP) across IPEs and gender of the respondents. The odds of preference for a chaperone were significantly less with a GP whom the respondents did not know well, compared with their usual GP, for a Pap smear (female) or genital examination (male).

Discussion: Individualised discussion regarding chaperone use for IPEs is warranted, especially with patients seeing their usual GP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian family physician
Australian family physician 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
0.61
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian GPs to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to a peer-review process before they are accepted for publication. The journal is indexed in MEDLINE, Index Medicus and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Bipolar disorder. Hoarse voice. Quality framework Great expectations. Sexually Transmitted Infections: Adopting a Sexual Health Paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1