Katie O'Leary, Jordan Eschler, Logan Kendall, Lisa M Vizer, James D Ralston, Wanda Pratt
{"title":"理解卫生技术的设计权衡:混合方法方法。","authors":"Katie O'Leary, Jordan Eschler, Logan Kendall, Lisa M Vizer, James D Ralston, Wanda Pratt","doi":"10.1145/2702123.2702576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We introduce a mixed-methods approach for determining how people weigh tradeoffs in values related to health and technologies for health self-management. Our approach combines interviews with Q-methodology, a method from psychology uniquely suited to quantifying opinions. We derive the framework for structured data collection and analysis for the Q-methodology from theories of self-management of chronic illness and technology adoption. To illustrate the power of this new approach, we used it in a field study of nine older adults with type 2 diabetes, and nine mothers of children with asthma. Our mixed-methods approach provides three key advantages for health design science in HCI: (1) it provides a structured health sciences theoretical framework to guide data collection and analysis; (2) it enhances the coding of unstructured data with statistical patterns of polarizing and consensus views; and (3) it empowers participants to actively weigh competing values that are most personally significant to them.</p>","PeriodicalId":74552,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference","volume":"2015 ","pages":"4151-4160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/2702123.2702576","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Design Tradeoffs for Health Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Katie O'Leary, Jordan Eschler, Logan Kendall, Lisa M Vizer, James D Ralston, Wanda Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2702123.2702576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We introduce a mixed-methods approach for determining how people weigh tradeoffs in values related to health and technologies for health self-management. Our approach combines interviews with Q-methodology, a method from psychology uniquely suited to quantifying opinions. We derive the framework for structured data collection and analysis for the Q-methodology from theories of self-management of chronic illness and technology adoption. To illustrate the power of this new approach, we used it in a field study of nine older adults with type 2 diabetes, and nine mothers of children with asthma. Our mixed-methods approach provides three key advantages for health design science in HCI: (1) it provides a structured health sciences theoretical framework to guide data collection and analysis; (2) it enhances the coding of unstructured data with statistical patterns of polarizing and consensus views; and (3) it empowers participants to actively weigh competing values that are most personally significant to them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference\",\"volume\":\"2015 \",\"pages\":\"4151-4160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/2702123.2702576\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Design Tradeoffs for Health Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Approach.
We introduce a mixed-methods approach for determining how people weigh tradeoffs in values related to health and technologies for health self-management. Our approach combines interviews with Q-methodology, a method from psychology uniquely suited to quantifying opinions. We derive the framework for structured data collection and analysis for the Q-methodology from theories of self-management of chronic illness and technology adoption. To illustrate the power of this new approach, we used it in a field study of nine older adults with type 2 diabetes, and nine mothers of children with asthma. Our mixed-methods approach provides three key advantages for health design science in HCI: (1) it provides a structured health sciences theoretical framework to guide data collection and analysis; (2) it enhances the coding of unstructured data with statistical patterns of polarizing and consensus views; and (3) it empowers participants to actively weigh competing values that are most personally significant to them.