听力保健的融资:我们可以从MarkeTrak 2022中学到什么。

Q2 Health Professions Seminars in Hearing Pub Date : 2022-12-01 eCollection Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758400
Ian M Windmill
{"title":"听力保健的融资:我们可以从MarkeTrak 2022中学到什么。","authors":"Ian M Windmill","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"cost\" of hearing aids has been a perceived key driver of the uptake, or lack thereof, of hearing aids. The MarkeTrak 2022 survey included questions that focused on the cost of the hearing test and amplification devices, out-of-pocket expenses, third-party coverage, and the perceived value of the devices. The hearing test itself was perceived as a barrier for some as the expense of the visit or the lack of third-party coverage was often cited as a reason for not following through on a recommendation to get a test. For those persons who received a hearing test, financial constraints were noted to be the most significant reason for not following through on a recommendation for a hearing aid, particularly for those over the age of 65 years. Higher income levels or some third-party coverage for devices was related to higher adoption rates. For persons who did choose to purchase amplification devices, financial considerations were not among the most important factors in reaching that decision. A clear majority of persons who made the decision to purchase amplification were satisfied with the out-of-pocket expenses associated with the purchase. The MarkeTrak 2022 Survey also included questions designed to assess the price sensitivity of individuals to various scenarios regarding the cost (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or $4000/pair) or the amount of third-party coverage (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or Total Cost). Results indicate increased amounts of third-party coverage were a bigger motivator than simply lowered cost. The MarkeTrak Survey indicates perceived cost factors continue to play a role in decisions to pursue hearing care and/or amplification devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":53691,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Hearing","volume":"43 4","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715306/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Financing of Hearing Care: What We Can Learn from MarkeTrak 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Ian M Windmill\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1758400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"cost\\\" of hearing aids has been a perceived key driver of the uptake, or lack thereof, of hearing aids. The MarkeTrak 2022 survey included questions that focused on the cost of the hearing test and amplification devices, out-of-pocket expenses, third-party coverage, and the perceived value of the devices. The hearing test itself was perceived as a barrier for some as the expense of the visit or the lack of third-party coverage was often cited as a reason for not following through on a recommendation to get a test. For those persons who received a hearing test, financial constraints were noted to be the most significant reason for not following through on a recommendation for a hearing aid, particularly for those over the age of 65 years. Higher income levels or some third-party coverage for devices was related to higher adoption rates. For persons who did choose to purchase amplification devices, financial considerations were not among the most important factors in reaching that decision. A clear majority of persons who made the decision to purchase amplification were satisfied with the out-of-pocket expenses associated with the purchase. The MarkeTrak 2022 Survey also included questions designed to assess the price sensitivity of individuals to various scenarios regarding the cost (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or $4000/pair) or the amount of third-party coverage (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or Total Cost). Results indicate increased amounts of third-party coverage were a bigger motivator than simply lowered cost. The MarkeTrak Survey indicates perceived cost factors continue to play a role in decisions to pursue hearing care and/or amplification devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Hearing\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"339-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

助听器的“成本”一直被认为是助听器使用与否的关键驱动因素。MarkeTrak 2022调查的问题主要集中在听力测试和放大设备的成本、自付费用、第三方保险以及设备的感知价值。对于一些人来说,听力测试本身被认为是一个障碍,因为访问费用或缺乏第三方保险经常被认为是不按照建议进行测试的原因。对于那些接受了听力测试的人来说,经济拮据是不按照建议佩戴助听器的最重要原因,尤其是对那些65岁以上的人来说。较高的收入水平或某些第三方设备覆盖率与较高的采用率有关。对于那些选择购买扩音设备的人来说,财务考虑并不是做出决定的最重要因素之一。绝大多数决定购买扩音的人都对与购买相关的自付费用感到满意。MarkeTrak 2022调查还包括一些问题,旨在评估个人对各种情况的价格敏感性,包括成本(例如,1000美元/双、2000美元/双或4000美元/双)或第三方保险金额(例如,1000美元/双、2000美元/双或总成本)。结果表明,增加第三方保险的覆盖面是比降低成本更大的动力。MarkeTrak调查显示,感知成本因素继续在选择听力保健和/或放大设备的决定中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Financing of Hearing Care: What We Can Learn from MarkeTrak 2022.

The "cost" of hearing aids has been a perceived key driver of the uptake, or lack thereof, of hearing aids. The MarkeTrak 2022 survey included questions that focused on the cost of the hearing test and amplification devices, out-of-pocket expenses, third-party coverage, and the perceived value of the devices. The hearing test itself was perceived as a barrier for some as the expense of the visit or the lack of third-party coverage was often cited as a reason for not following through on a recommendation to get a test. For those persons who received a hearing test, financial constraints were noted to be the most significant reason for not following through on a recommendation for a hearing aid, particularly for those over the age of 65 years. Higher income levels or some third-party coverage for devices was related to higher adoption rates. For persons who did choose to purchase amplification devices, financial considerations were not among the most important factors in reaching that decision. A clear majority of persons who made the decision to purchase amplification were satisfied with the out-of-pocket expenses associated with the purchase. The MarkeTrak 2022 Survey also included questions designed to assess the price sensitivity of individuals to various scenarios regarding the cost (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or $4000/pair) or the amount of third-party coverage (e.g., $1000/pair, $2000/pair, or Total Cost). Results indicate increased amounts of third-party coverage were a bigger motivator than simply lowered cost. The MarkeTrak Survey indicates perceived cost factors continue to play a role in decisions to pursue hearing care and/or amplification devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Hearing
Seminars in Hearing Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hearing is a quarterly review journal that publishes topic-specific issues in the field of audiology including areas such as hearing loss, auditory disorders and psychoacoustics. The journal presents the latest clinical data, new screening and assessment techniques, along with suggestions for improving patient care in a concise and readable forum. Technological advances with regards to new auditory devices are also featured. The journal"s content is an ideal reference for both the practicing audiologist as well as an excellent educational tool for students who require the latest information on emerging techniques and areas of interest in the field.
期刊最新文献
Errata: Unleashing the Power of Test Box and Real-Ear Probe Microphone Measurement. Chapter 3: Setting the Hearing Aid Response and Verifying Signal Processing and Features in the Test Box Chapter 5: Setting the Hearing Aid Response and Verifying Signal Processing and Features with Real-Ear Probe Microphone Measures Chapter 2: My Hearing Aid Isn't Working Like It Used to… How to Use This Workbook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1