间质性肺病患者切斯特台阶试验的可靠性和有效性。

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.10.009
{"title":"间质性肺病患者切斯特台阶试验的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Chester Step Test (CST) is a simple and inexpensive field test, which requires minimal physical space to assess exercise capacity. Such characteristics make the CST suitable to be used in different settings, however, its measurement properties in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with ILD. First, a CST-1 and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed. After 48-72 hours, a CST-2 was repeated. A 2nd rater was present in one of the sessions. Relative reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>1,1</sub> and ICC<sub>2,1</sub>). Absolute reliability was determined using standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) and the Bland-Altman method. The values of SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> were also expressed as a percentage of the mean. Construct validity was explored using Spearman correlation coefficient (r<sub>s</sub>) between the number of steps taken in the best CST and the distance performed in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-six patients with ILD (65.5±12.9 years; 48.5%men; FVC 79.4±18.8pp; DL<sub>CO</sub> 49.0±18.3pp) participated in the study. Relative (ICC 0.95-1.0) and absolute reliability were excellent without evidence of systematic bias. The SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> were 11.8 (14.7%) and 32.6 steps (40.7%), respectively. The correlation between CST and 6MWT was significant, positive, and high (r<sub>s</sub>=0.85, p=0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CST is a reliable and valid test and might be especially useful to assess exercise capacity in patients with ILD in limited space environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 570-576"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Chester step test in patients with interstitial lung disease\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Chester Step Test (CST) is a simple and inexpensive field test, which requires minimal physical space to assess exercise capacity. Such characteristics make the CST suitable to be used in different settings, however, its measurement properties in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with ILD. First, a CST-1 and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed. After 48-72 hours, a CST-2 was repeated. A 2nd rater was present in one of the sessions. Relative reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>1,1</sub> and ICC<sub>2,1</sub>). Absolute reliability was determined using standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval (MDC<sub>95</sub>) and the Bland-Altman method. The values of SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> were also expressed as a percentage of the mean. Construct validity was explored using Spearman correlation coefficient (r<sub>s</sub>) between the number of steps taken in the best CST and the distance performed in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-six patients with ILD (65.5±12.9 years; 48.5%men; FVC 79.4±18.8pp; DL<sub>CO</sub> 49.0±18.3pp) participated in the study. Relative (ICC 0.95-1.0) and absolute reliability were excellent without evidence of systematic bias. The SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> were 11.8 (14.7%) and 32.6 steps (40.7%), respectively. The correlation between CST and 6MWT was significant, positive, and high (r<sub>s</sub>=0.85, p=0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CST is a reliable and valid test and might be especially useful to assess exercise capacity in patients with ILD in limited space environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 570-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043722002549\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043722002549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:切斯特台阶试验(CST)是一种简单而廉价的现场试验,只需最小的物理空间即可评估运动能力。这些特点使切斯特台阶试验适合在不同环境中使用,但其在间质性肺病(ILD)患者中的测量特性尚不清楚:方法:对 ILD 患者进行了一项横断面研究。首先,进行 CST-1 和 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)。48-72 小时后,重复 CST-2。在其中一次测试中,有第二位评分者在场。相对可靠性采用类内相关系数(ICC1,1 和 ICC2,1)进行测量。绝对信度采用标准测量误差(SEM)、95% 置信区间(MDC95)的最小可检测变化和布兰德-阿尔特曼法确定。SEM 和 MDC95 的值也以平均值的百分比表示。使用最佳 CST 的步数与 6MWT 的距离之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数(rs)探讨了结构有效性:66名 ILD 患者(65.5±12.9 岁;48.5% 男性;FVC 79.4±18.8pp;DLCO 49.0±18.3pp)参加了研究。相对信度(ICC 0.95-1.0)和绝对信度都非常好,没有系统性偏差的证据。SEM和MDC95分别为11.8步(14.7%)和32.6步(40.7%)。CST与6MWT之间的相关性显著、正且高(rs=0.85,P=0.001):CST是一项可靠有效的测试,尤其适用于评估ILD患者在有限空间环境中的运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and validity of the Chester step test in patients with interstitial lung disease

Background

The Chester Step Test (CST) is a simple and inexpensive field test, which requires minimal physical space to assess exercise capacity. Such characteristics make the CST suitable to be used in different settings, however, its measurement properties in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are unknown.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with ILD. First, a CST-1 and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed. After 48-72 hours, a CST-2 was repeated. A 2nd rater was present in one of the sessions. Relative reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,1 and ICC2,1). Absolute reliability was determined using standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval (MDC95) and the Bland-Altman method. The values of SEM and MDC95 were also expressed as a percentage of the mean. Construct validity was explored using Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) between the number of steps taken in the best CST and the distance performed in the 6MWT.

Results

Sixty-six patients with ILD (65.5±12.9 years; 48.5%men; FVC 79.4±18.8pp; DLCO 49.0±18.3pp) participated in the study. Relative (ICC 0.95-1.0) and absolute reliability were excellent without evidence of systematic bias. The SEM and MDC95 were 11.8 (14.7%) and 32.6 steps (40.7%), respectively. The correlation between CST and 6MWT was significant, positive, and high (rs=0.85, p=0.001).

Conclusion

The CST is a reliable and valid test and might be especially useful to assess exercise capacity in patients with ILD in limited space environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
Performance of helmet CPAP using different configurations: Turbine-driven ventilators vs Venturi devices. Silicosis and tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Defective exercise-related expiratory muscle recruitment in patients with PHOX2B mutations: A clue to neural determinants of the congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. Benign ectopic intrapulmonary thyroid: Further proof of its existence. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome and the hazards of meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1