Hu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Hui Li, Heng Zhang, Dan Zheng, Chen-Ming Sun, Jie Wu
{"title":"TIPS与内窥镜治疗肝硬化静脉曲张再出血:最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Hu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Hui Li, Heng Zhang, Dan Zheng, Chen-Ming Sun, Jie Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","volume":"37 4","pages":"475-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis update.\",\"authors\":\"Hu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Hui Li, Heng Zhang, Dan Zheng, Chen-Ming Sun, Jie Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"475-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1760-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
内镜治疗(ET)是预防肝硬化静脉曲张出血最常用的方法,但效果并不理想。近年来,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)被引入临床实践。然而,与ET相比,TIPS对肝硬化患者的有益作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估和比较TIPS与最常用的ET预防肝硬化静脉曲张再出血(VRB)的效果。检索了pubm - med、EMBASE和Cochrane Library数据库,检索时间从成立到2017年2月。主要研究结果包括VRB的发生率、全因死亡率、出血相关死亡和治疗后肝性脑病(PTE)的发生率。将二分类变量的比值比(ORs)与95%置信区间(CI)合并。进行亚组分析。24项研究符合条件,其中包括1120名接受TIPS治疗的受试者和1065名接受ET治疗的受试者。尽管在生存率和PTE方面没有显著差异,但TIPS在降低VRB发生率方面优于ET (OR=0.27;95% ci, 0.19-0.39, p
TIPS versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in cirrhosis: A meta-analysis update.
Endoscopic therapy (ET) is most common method for preventing variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, but the outcomes are not perfect. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is introduced into clinical practice. However, the beneficial effects of TIPS compared to ET on cirrhotic patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of TIPS with those of the most frequently used ET for prevention of variceal rebleeding (VRB) in liver cirrhosis. The Pub-Med, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 2017. The primary study outcomes included the incidence of VRB, all-cause mortality, bleeding-related death, and the incidence of post-treatment hepatic encephalopathy (PTE). The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous variables. Subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-four studies were eligible and they included 1120 subjects treated with TIPS and 1065 subjects treated with ET. Although there was no significant difference in survival and PTE, TIPS was superior to ET in decreasing the incidence of VRB (OR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39, P<0.00001), and decreasing the incidence of bleeding-related death (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.32, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis found a lower mortality (OR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.97; P=0.04) without any increased incidence of PTE (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.75-2.50; P=0.31) in the studies of a greater proportion (≥40%) of patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis receiving TIPS, and TIPS with covered stent did not increase the risk of PTE compared to ET (OR=1.52, 95% CI =0.82-2.80, P=0.18). It was concluded that TIPS with covered stent might be considered the preferred choice of therapy in patients with severe liver disease for secondary prophylaxis.