骨质量评估技术:从宏观尺度到纳米尺度的几何、成分和力学表征。

IF 0.8 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2016-09-01 Epub Date: 2016-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4
Heather B Hunt, Eve Donnelly
{"title":"骨质量评估技术:从宏观尺度到纳米尺度的几何、成分和力学表征。","authors":"Heather B Hunt,&nbsp;Eve Donnelly","doi":"10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review presents an overview of the characterization techniques available to experimentally evaluate bone quality, defined as the geometric and material factors that contribute to fracture resistance independently of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The methods available for characterization of the geometric, compositional, and mechanical properties of bone across multiple length scales are summarized, along with their outcomes and their advantages and disadvantages. Examples of how each technique is used are discussed, as well as practical concerns such as sample preparation and whether or not each testing method is destructive. Techniques that can be used <i>in vivo</i> and those that have been recently improved or developed are emphasized, including high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography to evaluate geometric properties and reference point indentation to evaluate material properties. Because no single method can completely characterize bone quality, we provide a framework for how multiple characterization methods can be used together to generate a more comprehensive analysis of bone quality to complement aBMD in fracture risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45316,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":"14 3","pages":"133-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone quality assessment techniques: geometric, compositional, and mechanical characterization from macroscale to nanoscale.\",\"authors\":\"Heather B Hunt,&nbsp;Eve Donnelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review presents an overview of the characterization techniques available to experimentally evaluate bone quality, defined as the geometric and material factors that contribute to fracture resistance independently of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The methods available for characterization of the geometric, compositional, and mechanical properties of bone across multiple length scales are summarized, along with their outcomes and their advantages and disadvantages. Examples of how each technique is used are discussed, as well as practical concerns such as sample preparation and whether or not each testing method is destructive. Techniques that can be used <i>in vivo</i> and those that have been recently improved or developed are emphasized, including high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography to evaluate geometric properties and reference point indentation to evaluate material properties. Because no single method can completely characterize bone quality, we provide a framework for how multiple characterization methods can be used together to generate a more comprehensive analysis of bone quality to complement aBMD in fracture risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"133-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-016-9222-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

本文综述了可用于实验评估骨质量的表征技术,定义为几何和材料因素,这些因素独立于双能x射线吸收仪评估的面骨矿物质密度(aBMD)。本文总结了用于表征骨的几何、成分和力学性能的各种方法,以及它们的结果和优缺点。讨论了如何使用每种技术的示例,以及实际问题,例如样品制备以及每种测试方法是否具有破坏性。强调了可在体内使用的技术和最近改进或发展的技术,包括用于评估几何特性的高分辨率外围定量计算机断层扫描和用于评估材料特性的参考点压痕。由于没有一种方法可以完全表征骨质量,因此我们提供了一个框架,以便多种表征方法可以一起使用,以产生更全面的骨质量分析,以补充aBMD在骨折风险评估中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bone quality assessment techniques: geometric, compositional, and mechanical characterization from macroscale to nanoscale.

This review presents an overview of the characterization techniques available to experimentally evaluate bone quality, defined as the geometric and material factors that contribute to fracture resistance independently of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The methods available for characterization of the geometric, compositional, and mechanical properties of bone across multiple length scales are summarized, along with their outcomes and their advantages and disadvantages. Examples of how each technique is used are discussed, as well as practical concerns such as sample preparation and whether or not each testing method is destructive. Techniques that can be used in vivo and those that have been recently improved or developed are emphasized, including high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography to evaluate geometric properties and reference point indentation to evaluate material properties. Because no single method can completely characterize bone quality, we provide a framework for how multiple characterization methods can be used together to generate a more comprehensive analysis of bone quality to complement aBMD in fracture risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism is an international review journal aimed at integrating new information from both basic and clinical science into the context of clinical practice in the wide field of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Although one purpose of the journal is to deal with the well-known classical aspects of bone and mineral physiology, the journal’s unique character is to highlight information about the advancing field of molecular medicine, which now finds linkages between this classical field and disease states that in the past were considered distinct. For example, cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis share many biochemical pathways. New molecular tools show common pathways with bone physiology and obesity, diabetes mellitus, and energy metabolism. The focus on the novel is a major aspect of this journal’s purpose. The rapid developments in the field needs to be represented in a comprehensive way in order to keep students, clinicians and researchers up-to date. In order to assure that all latest developments are covered, the journal publishes, not only, unsolicited reviews, but also invited reviews on most important topics as well.
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Approach to Clinical and Translational Metabolism Research Type 2 Diabetes and Bone Disease Pregnancy-Associated Osteoporosis: A Literature Review The Macrophage’s Role on Bone Remodeling and Osteogenesis: a Systematic Review A Review on the Recent Trend in Osteoporosis Highly Cited Papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1