Monica Garcia-Alloza, Laura A Borrelli, Diana H Thyssen, Suzanne E Hickman, Joseph El Khoury, Brian J Bacskai
{"title":"APP/PS1xCX3CR1/GFP小鼠对抗a β治疗的四维小胶质细胞反应","authors":"Monica Garcia-Alloza, Laura A Borrelli, Diana H Thyssen, Suzanne E Hickman, Joseph El Khoury, Brian J Bacskai","doi":"10.4161/intv.25693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Senile plaques, mainly composed of amyloid-β (Aβ), are a major hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD), and immunotherapy is a leading therapeutic approach for Aβ clearance. Although the ultimate mechanisms for Aβ clearance are not well known, characteristic microglia clusters are observed in the surround of senile plaques, and are implicated both in the elimination of Aβ as well as the deleterious inflammatory effects observed in AD patients after active immunization. Therefore, analyzing the direct effect of immunotherapy on microglia, using longitudinal in vivo multiphoton microscopy can provide important information regarding the role of microglia in immunotherapy. While microglia were observed to surround senile plaques, topical anti-Aβ antibody administration, which led to a reduction in plaque size, directed microglia toward senile plaques, and the overall size of microglia and number of processes were increased. In some cases, we observed clusters of microglia in areas of the brain that did not have detectable amyloid aggregates, but this did not predict the deposition of new plaques in the area within a week of imaging, indicating that microglia react to but do not precipitate amyloid aggregation. The long-term presence of large microglial clusters in the surrounding area of senile plaques suggests that microglia cannot effectively remove Aβ unless anti-Aβ antibody is administered. All together, these data suggest that although there is a role for microglia in Aβ clearance, it requires an intervention like immunotherapy to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":14512,"journal":{"name":"IntraVital","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/intv.25693","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four-dimensional microglia response to anti-Aβ treatment in APP/PS1xCX3CR1/GFP mice.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Garcia-Alloza, Laura A Borrelli, Diana H Thyssen, Suzanne E Hickman, Joseph El Khoury, Brian J Bacskai\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/intv.25693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Senile plaques, mainly composed of amyloid-β (Aβ), are a major hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD), and immunotherapy is a leading therapeutic approach for Aβ clearance. Although the ultimate mechanisms for Aβ clearance are not well known, characteristic microglia clusters are observed in the surround of senile plaques, and are implicated both in the elimination of Aβ as well as the deleterious inflammatory effects observed in AD patients after active immunization. Therefore, analyzing the direct effect of immunotherapy on microglia, using longitudinal in vivo multiphoton microscopy can provide important information regarding the role of microglia in immunotherapy. While microglia were observed to surround senile plaques, topical anti-Aβ antibody administration, which led to a reduction in plaque size, directed microglia toward senile plaques, and the overall size of microglia and number of processes were increased. In some cases, we observed clusters of microglia in areas of the brain that did not have detectable amyloid aggregates, but this did not predict the deposition of new plaques in the area within a week of imaging, indicating that microglia react to but do not precipitate amyloid aggregation. The long-term presence of large microglial clusters in the surrounding area of senile plaques suggests that microglia cannot effectively remove Aβ unless anti-Aβ antibody is administered. All together, these data suggest that although there is a role for microglia in Aβ clearance, it requires an intervention like immunotherapy to be effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IntraVital\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/intv.25693\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IntraVital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/intv.25693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IntraVital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/intv.25693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
老年斑主要由淀粉样蛋白-β (a β)组成,是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的主要标志,免疫疗法是清除a β的主要治疗方法。尽管Aβ清除的最终机制尚不清楚,但在老年斑周围观察到特征性的小胶质细胞簇,并且与主动免疫后AD患者中观察到的Aβ清除和有害炎症效应有关。因此,利用体内纵向多光子显微镜分析免疫治疗对小胶质细胞的直接影响,可以为小胶质细胞在免疫治疗中的作用提供重要信息。当观察到小胶质细胞围绕老年斑时,局部抗a β抗体管理导致斑块大小减少,使小胶质细胞朝向老年斑,小胶质细胞的总体大小和突起数量增加。在某些情况下,我们在没有检测到淀粉样蛋白聚集的大脑区域观察到小胶质细胞簇,但这并不能预测成像一周内该区域新斑块的沉积,这表明小胶质细胞对淀粉样蛋白聚集有反应,但不会沉淀淀粉样蛋白聚集。老年斑周围区域长期存在大的小胶质细胞簇表明,除非给予抗Aβ抗体,否则小胶质细胞不能有效地去除Aβ。综上所述,这些数据表明,尽管小胶质细胞在a β清除中起作用,但它需要免疫治疗等干预才能有效。
Four-dimensional microglia response to anti-Aβ treatment in APP/PS1xCX3CR1/GFP mice.
Senile plaques, mainly composed of amyloid-β (Aβ), are a major hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD), and immunotherapy is a leading therapeutic approach for Aβ clearance. Although the ultimate mechanisms for Aβ clearance are not well known, characteristic microglia clusters are observed in the surround of senile plaques, and are implicated both in the elimination of Aβ as well as the deleterious inflammatory effects observed in AD patients after active immunization. Therefore, analyzing the direct effect of immunotherapy on microglia, using longitudinal in vivo multiphoton microscopy can provide important information regarding the role of microglia in immunotherapy. While microglia were observed to surround senile plaques, topical anti-Aβ antibody administration, which led to a reduction in plaque size, directed microglia toward senile plaques, and the overall size of microglia and number of processes were increased. In some cases, we observed clusters of microglia in areas of the brain that did not have detectable amyloid aggregates, but this did not predict the deposition of new plaques in the area within a week of imaging, indicating that microglia react to but do not precipitate amyloid aggregation. The long-term presence of large microglial clusters in the surrounding area of senile plaques suggests that microglia cannot effectively remove Aβ unless anti-Aβ antibody is administered. All together, these data suggest that although there is a role for microglia in Aβ clearance, it requires an intervention like immunotherapy to be effective.