四种胶结物抗压强度和吸附/溶解度的评价。

Journal of Dental Biomaterial Pub Date : 2017-06-01
Tavangar Ms, Jafarpur D, Bagheri R
{"title":"四种胶结物抗压强度和吸附/溶解度的评价。","authors":"Tavangar Ms,&nbsp;Jafarpur D,&nbsp;Bagheri R","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Compressive strength (CS) and sorption/solubility of the luting cements are two associated factors. Searching a correlation between sorption/solubility and compressive strength of various luting cements is required.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure the water sorption/solubility, and compressive strength of three resin-based and one conventional glass ionomer (CGI) luting cement after 1 and 24 h of immersion in distilled water and to determine if there is any correlation between those properties found.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four luting cements were investigated. For each material, 10 disc shaped specimens were prepared for measuring the sorption/solubility. The specimens were cured according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the sorption/solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049's. For testing the compression strength, for each material 16 cylindrical specimens were prepared by insertion of cements into a stainless steel split mould. The specimens were cured, divided into groups of 8, and then stored in distilled water at (37 ± 1)°C for 1 and 24 h. The test was performed using the universal testing machine, the maximum load was recorded and CS was calculated. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 18. One-way ANOVA, <i>post-hoc</i> Tukey's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G-CEM had the highest mean CS (153.60± 25.15) and CGI luting had the lowest CS (21.36±5.37) (<i>p</i> <0.001). After 24 h, mean CS values showed an increase for almost all materials except for RelyXTM U200 which showed a slight reduction. However, no statistically significant difference was founded (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The lowest mean sorption/solubility value was for RelyX<sup>TM</sup> U200 and Panavia F, and the highest for CGI luting (all <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The compressive strength of all cements did not necessarily increase after 24 h and varied depending on the materials. There was a strong reverse correlation between sorption and CS values after both 1 and 24 h immersion. It may be practical for clinician to use those cements with the less sorption / solubility and more stable compression strength over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":53341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/91/JDB-4-387.PMC5608068.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements.\",\"authors\":\"Tavangar Ms,&nbsp;Jafarpur D,&nbsp;Bagheri R\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Compressive strength (CS) and sorption/solubility of the luting cements are two associated factors. Searching a correlation between sorption/solubility and compressive strength of various luting cements is required.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure the water sorption/solubility, and compressive strength of three resin-based and one conventional glass ionomer (CGI) luting cement after 1 and 24 h of immersion in distilled water and to determine if there is any correlation between those properties found.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four luting cements were investigated. For each material, 10 disc shaped specimens were prepared for measuring the sorption/solubility. The specimens were cured according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the sorption/solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049's. For testing the compression strength, for each material 16 cylindrical specimens were prepared by insertion of cements into a stainless steel split mould. The specimens were cured, divided into groups of 8, and then stored in distilled water at (37 ± 1)°C for 1 and 24 h. The test was performed using the universal testing machine, the maximum load was recorded and CS was calculated. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 18. One-way ANOVA, <i>post-hoc</i> Tukey's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>G-CEM had the highest mean CS (153.60± 25.15) and CGI luting had the lowest CS (21.36±5.37) (<i>p</i> <0.001). After 24 h, mean CS values showed an increase for almost all materials except for RelyXTM U200 which showed a slight reduction. However, no statistically significant difference was founded (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The lowest mean sorption/solubility value was for RelyX<sup>TM</sup> U200 and Panavia F, and the highest for CGI luting (all <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The compressive strength of all cements did not necessarily increase after 24 h and varied depending on the materials. There was a strong reverse correlation between sorption and CS values after both 1 and 24 h immersion. It may be practical for clinician to use those cements with the less sorption / solubility and more stable compression strength over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Biomaterial\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/91/JDB-4-387.PMC5608068.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Biomaterial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Biomaterial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题说明:水泥的抗压强度(CS)和吸附/溶解度是两个相关因素。寻找各种胶结物的吸附/溶解度与抗压强度之间的关系是必要的。目的:测量三种树脂基水泥和一种传统玻璃离子(CGI)水泥在蒸馏水中浸泡1和24小时后的吸水性/溶解度和抗压强度,并确定这些性能之间是否存在相关性。材料与方法:对四种胶结物进行了研究。每种材料制备10个圆盘形试样用于测定吸附/溶解度。样品按照制造商的说明进行固化,并按照ISO 4049的要求测量吸附/溶解度。为了测试抗压强度,每种材料通过将水泥插入不锈钢分体式模具中制备16个圆柱形试样。将试件固化后,每组8个,在(37±1)℃蒸馏水中分别保存1和24 h。采用万能试验机进行试验,记录最大载荷并计算CS。采用SPSS软件18版对数据进行分析。进行单因素方差分析、事后Tukey检验和Pearson相关系数分析。结果:G-CEM的平均CS最高(153.60±25.15),CGI luting的平均CS最低(21.36±5.37)(p > 0.05)。RelyXTM U200和Panavia F的平均吸附/溶解度值最低,CGI luting的平均吸附/溶解度值最高(均p < 0.001)。结论:所有胶结物的抗压强度在24h后并不一定增加,而是随材料的不同而不同。浸泡1 h和24 h后,吸附量与CS值呈显著负相关。对于临床医生来说,随着时间的推移,使用吸附性/溶解度更低、抗压强度更稳定的水泥可能是实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements.

Statement of problem: Compressive strength (CS) and sorption/solubility of the luting cements are two associated factors. Searching a correlation between sorption/solubility and compressive strength of various luting cements is required.

Objectives: To measure the water sorption/solubility, and compressive strength of three resin-based and one conventional glass ionomer (CGI) luting cement after 1 and 24 h of immersion in distilled water and to determine if there is any correlation between those properties found.

Materials and methods: Four luting cements were investigated. For each material, 10 disc shaped specimens were prepared for measuring the sorption/solubility. The specimens were cured according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the sorption/solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049's. For testing the compression strength, for each material 16 cylindrical specimens were prepared by insertion of cements into a stainless steel split mould. The specimens were cured, divided into groups of 8, and then stored in distilled water at (37 ± 1)°C for 1 and 24 h. The test was performed using the universal testing machine, the maximum load was recorded and CS was calculated. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 18. One-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were performed.

Results: G-CEM had the highest mean CS (153.60± 25.15) and CGI luting had the lowest CS (21.36±5.37) (p <0.001). After 24 h, mean CS values showed an increase for almost all materials except for RelyXTM U200 which showed a slight reduction. However, no statistically significant difference was founded (all p > 0.05). The lowest mean sorption/solubility value was for RelyXTM U200 and Panavia F, and the highest for CGI luting (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The compressive strength of all cements did not necessarily increase after 24 h and varied depending on the materials. There was a strong reverse correlation between sorption and CS values after both 1 and 24 h immersion. It may be practical for clinician to use those cements with the less sorption / solubility and more stable compression strength over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Colour Stability of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Analysis of Ground Water Fluoride Content and its Association with Prevalence of Fluorosis in Zarand/Kerman: (Using GIS). Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Sorption/Solubility of Four Luting Cements. Factors Affecting Oral Hygiene and Tooth Brushing in Preschool Children, Shiraz/Iran. Evaluation of Surface Characteristics of Denture Base Using Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Coating: An SEM Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1