白光3D人体体积扫描仪评估人体成分的验证。

Obesity, open access Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-04-19 DOI:10.16966/2380-5528.127
Jose Medina-Inojosa, Virend Somers, Sarah Jenkins, Jennifer Zundel, Lynne Johnson, Chassidy Grimes, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
{"title":"白光3D人体体积扫描仪评估人体成分的验证。","authors":"Jose Medina-Inojosa,&nbsp;Virend Somers,&nbsp;Sarah Jenkins,&nbsp;Jennifer Zundel,&nbsp;Lynne Johnson,&nbsp;Chassidy Grimes,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez","doi":"10.16966/2380-5528.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Estimating body fat content has shown to be a better predictor of adiposity-related cardiovascular risk than the commonly used body mass index (BMI). The white-light 3D body volume index (BVI) scanner is a non-invasive device normally used in the clothing industry to assess body shapes and sizes. We assessed the hypothesis that volume obtained by BVI is comparable to the volume obtained by air displacement plethysmography (Bod-Pod) and thus capable of assessing body fat mass using the bi-compartmental principles of body composition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared BVI to Bod-pod, a validated bicompartmental method to assess body fat percent that uses pressure/volume relationships in isothermal conditions to estimate body volume. Volume is then used to calculate body density (BD) applying the formula density=Body Mass/Volume. Body fat mass percentage is then calculated using the Siri formula (4.95/BD - 4.50) × 100. Subjects were undergoing a wellness evaluation. Measurements from both devices were obtained the same day. A prediction model for total Bod-pod volume was developed using linear regression based on 80% of the observations (N=971), as follows: Predicted Bod-pod Volume (L)=9.498+0.805*(BVI volume, L)-0.0411*(Age, years)-3.295*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0554*(BVI volume, L)*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0282*(Age, years)*(Male=0, Female=1). Predictions for Bod-pod volume based on the estimated model were then calculated for the remaining 20% (N=243) and compared to the volume measured by the Bod-pod.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age among the 971 individuals was 41.5 ± 12.9 years, 39.4% were men, weight 81.6 ± 20.9 kg, BMI was 27.8 ± 6.3kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Average difference between volume measured by Bod-pod- predicted volume by BVI was 0.0 L, median: -0.4 L, IQR: -1.8 L to 1.5 L, R2=0.9845. Average difference between body fat measured-predicted was-1%, median: -2.7%, IQR: -13.2 to 9.9, R2=0.9236.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Volume and BFM can be estimated by using volume measurements obtained by a white- light 3D body scanner and the prediction model developed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":91587,"journal":{"name":"Obesity, open access","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645052/pdf/nihms871798.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a White-light 3D Body Volume Scanner to Assess Body Composition.\",\"authors\":\"Jose Medina-Inojosa,&nbsp;Virend Somers,&nbsp;Sarah Jenkins,&nbsp;Jennifer Zundel,&nbsp;Lynne Johnson,&nbsp;Chassidy Grimes,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.16966/2380-5528.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Estimating body fat content has shown to be a better predictor of adiposity-related cardiovascular risk than the commonly used body mass index (BMI). The white-light 3D body volume index (BVI) scanner is a non-invasive device normally used in the clothing industry to assess body shapes and sizes. We assessed the hypothesis that volume obtained by BVI is comparable to the volume obtained by air displacement plethysmography (Bod-Pod) and thus capable of assessing body fat mass using the bi-compartmental principles of body composition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared BVI to Bod-pod, a validated bicompartmental method to assess body fat percent that uses pressure/volume relationships in isothermal conditions to estimate body volume. Volume is then used to calculate body density (BD) applying the formula density=Body Mass/Volume. Body fat mass percentage is then calculated using the Siri formula (4.95/BD - 4.50) × 100. Subjects were undergoing a wellness evaluation. Measurements from both devices were obtained the same day. A prediction model for total Bod-pod volume was developed using linear regression based on 80% of the observations (N=971), as follows: Predicted Bod-pod Volume (L)=9.498+0.805*(BVI volume, L)-0.0411*(Age, years)-3.295*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0554*(BVI volume, L)*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0282*(Age, years)*(Male=0, Female=1). Predictions for Bod-pod volume based on the estimated model were then calculated for the remaining 20% (N=243) and compared to the volume measured by the Bod-pod.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age among the 971 individuals was 41.5 ± 12.9 years, 39.4% were men, weight 81.6 ± 20.9 kg, BMI was 27.8 ± 6.3kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Average difference between volume measured by Bod-pod- predicted volume by BVI was 0.0 L, median: -0.4 L, IQR: -1.8 L to 1.5 L, R2=0.9845. Average difference between body fat measured-predicted was-1%, median: -2.7%, IQR: -13.2 to 9.9, R2=0.9236.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Volume and BFM can be estimated by using volume measurements obtained by a white- light 3D body scanner and the prediction model developed in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity, open access\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5645052/pdf/nihms871798.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity, open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16966/2380-5528.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity, open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2380-5528.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与常用的身体质量指数(BMI)相比,估算体脂含量可以更好地预测与肥胖相关的心血管风险。白光3D身体体积指数(BVI)扫描仪是一种非侵入性设备,通常用于服装行业评估身体形状和尺寸。我们评估了这样一个假设,即BVI获得的体积与空气置换体积脉搏仪(Bod-Pod)获得的体积相当,因此能够使用身体成分的双室原理评估身体脂肪质量。方法:我们将BVI与Bod-pod进行了比较,Bod-pod是一种经过验证的双室法,用于评估体脂率,该方法使用等温条件下的压力/体积关系来估计体体积。然后用体积来计算身体密度(BD),公式为密度=身体质量/体积。然后使用Siri公式(4.95/BD - 4.50) × 100计算体脂质量百分比。受试者正在进行健康评估。两种设备的测量结果都是在同一天得到的。基于80%的观测值(N=971),采用线性回归方法建立了虫体总体积预测模型,预测虫体总体积(L)=9.498+0.805*(BVI体积,L)-0.0411*(年龄,年)-3.295*(男性=0,女性=1)+0.0554*(BVI体积,L)*(男性=0,女性=1)+0.0282*(年龄,年)*(男性=0,女性=1)。然后根据估计模型计算剩余20% (N=243)的Bod-pod体积预测,并与Bod-pod测量的体积进行比较。结果:971例患者平均年龄41.5±12.9岁,男性占39.4%,体重81.6±20.9 kg, BMI为27.8±6.3kg/m2。BVI测定容积与Bod-pod预测容积的平均差值为0.0 L,中位数为-0.4 L, IQR为-1.8 L ~ 1.5 L, R2=0.9845。体脂测量-预测的平均差异为-1%,中位数:-2.7%,IQR: -13.2 ~ 9.9, R2=0.9236。结论:利用白光三维人体扫描仪获得的体积测量值和本研究建立的预测模型可以估计体积和BFM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a White-light 3D Body Volume Scanner to Assess Body Composition.

Introduction: Estimating body fat content has shown to be a better predictor of adiposity-related cardiovascular risk than the commonly used body mass index (BMI). The white-light 3D body volume index (BVI) scanner is a non-invasive device normally used in the clothing industry to assess body shapes and sizes. We assessed the hypothesis that volume obtained by BVI is comparable to the volume obtained by air displacement plethysmography (Bod-Pod) and thus capable of assessing body fat mass using the bi-compartmental principles of body composition.

Methods: We compared BVI to Bod-pod, a validated bicompartmental method to assess body fat percent that uses pressure/volume relationships in isothermal conditions to estimate body volume. Volume is then used to calculate body density (BD) applying the formula density=Body Mass/Volume. Body fat mass percentage is then calculated using the Siri formula (4.95/BD - 4.50) × 100. Subjects were undergoing a wellness evaluation. Measurements from both devices were obtained the same day. A prediction model for total Bod-pod volume was developed using linear regression based on 80% of the observations (N=971), as follows: Predicted Bod-pod Volume (L)=9.498+0.805*(BVI volume, L)-0.0411*(Age, years)-3.295*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0554*(BVI volume, L)*(Male=0, Female=1)+0.0282*(Age, years)*(Male=0, Female=1). Predictions for Bod-pod volume based on the estimated model were then calculated for the remaining 20% (N=243) and compared to the volume measured by the Bod-pod.

Results: Mean age among the 971 individuals was 41.5 ± 12.9 years, 39.4% were men, weight 81.6 ± 20.9 kg, BMI was 27.8 ± 6.3kg/m2. Average difference between volume measured by Bod-pod- predicted volume by BVI was 0.0 L, median: -0.4 L, IQR: -1.8 L to 1.5 L, R2=0.9845. Average difference between body fat measured-predicted was-1%, median: -2.7%, IQR: -13.2 to 9.9, R2=0.9236.

Conclusion: Volume and BFM can be estimated by using volume measurements obtained by a white- light 3D body scanner and the prediction model developed in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of a White-light 3D Body Volume Scanner to Assess Body Composition. Reliability of a 3D Body Scanner for Anthropometric Measurements of Central Obesity. A Health Equity Problem for Low Income Children: Diet Flexibility Requires Physician Authorization. Psychological Health and Overweight and Obesity Among High Stressed Work Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1