{"title":"前牙骨折修复的病因及临床评价:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Uzay Koc Vural, Arlin Kiremitci, Saadet Gokalp","doi":"10.17096/jiufd.75775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractured anterior teeth directly restored with a submicron hybrid composite (Spectrum TPH) resin and respective adhesive system (Prime and Bond NT) were evaluated. The United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Siegel and Castellan tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two maxillary incisors and one canine of 51 patients were evaluated. The patient's age at the time of therapy ranged from 14 to 64 years old (mean 25.47). Mostly observed crown fracture was seen in upper incisors (84.9%) and due to falls (58.8%). At the 6-month follow-up, one patient lost one restoration and at the 12-month, one patient lost one and one lost two restorations. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of marginal adaptation between 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this short-term observation period, remaining tooth structure was conserved and good patient compliance was achieved. Factors such as esthetic and/or cost should be considered to indicate the direct composite restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":30947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","volume":"50 3","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/e8/jiufd-050-038-b.PMC5573513.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Uzay Koc Vural, Arlin Kiremitci, Saadet Gokalp\",\"doi\":\"10.17096/jiufd.75775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractured anterior teeth directly restored with a submicron hybrid composite (Spectrum TPH) resin and respective adhesive system (Prime and Bond NT) were evaluated. The United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Siegel and Castellan tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two maxillary incisors and one canine of 51 patients were evaluated. The patient's age at the time of therapy ranged from 14 to 64 years old (mean 25.47). Mostly observed crown fracture was seen in upper incisors (84.9%) and due to falls (58.8%). At the 6-month follow-up, one patient lost one restoration and at the 12-month, one patient lost one and one lost two restorations. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of marginal adaptation between 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this short-term observation period, remaining tooth structure was conserved and good patient compliance was achieved. Factors such as esthetic and/or cost should be considered to indicate the direct composite restorations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"38-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/e8/jiufd-050-038-b.PMC5573513.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.75775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.75775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:探讨复合树脂在固定前牙6个月和12个月牙冠断裂的病因及治疗效果。对象和方法:从牙科学校诊所检索51例患者的记录,包括73例骨折前牙直接用亚微米混合复合树脂(光谱TPH)和各自的粘接剂系统(Prime和Bond NT)进行修复。临床评价采用美国公共卫生服务标准。数据分析采用Wilcoxon sign Rank、Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney U和Siegel and Castellan检验。结果:对51例患者的72个上颌门牙和1个犬齿进行了检查。患者治疗时年龄14 ~ 64岁(平均25.47岁)。冠状骨折主要发生在上切牙(84.9%)和跌倒(58.8%)。随访6个月时,1例患者丢失1个修复体,随访12个月时,1例患者丢失1个修复体,1例患者丢失2个修复体。在6个月和12个月的边际适应方面,发现了统计学上显著的差异。结论:在短期的观察期内,保留了牙齿的剩余结构,患者的依从性良好。应考虑美学和/或成本等因素来指示直接复合修复。
Etiologic factors and clinical evaluation of restored fractured anterior teeth: an observational study.
Purpose: The aims of this study were to investigate the etiologic factors and to evaluate performance of composite resin on fractured crown in permanent anterior teeth at 6 and 12 months.
Subjects and methods: Records from 51 patients were retrieved from a Dental School Clinic, comprising 73 fractured anterior teeth directly restored with a submicron hybrid composite (Spectrum TPH) resin and respective adhesive system (Prime and Bond NT) were evaluated. The United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical evaluation. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Siegel and Castellan tests.
Results: Seventy-two maxillary incisors and one canine of 51 patients were evaluated. The patient's age at the time of therapy ranged from 14 to 64 years old (mean 25.47). Mostly observed crown fracture was seen in upper incisors (84.9%) and due to falls (58.8%). At the 6-month follow-up, one patient lost one restoration and at the 12-month, one patient lost one and one lost two restorations. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of marginal adaptation between 6 and 12 months.
Conclusion: In this short-term observation period, remaining tooth structure was conserved and good patient compliance was achieved. Factors such as esthetic and/or cost should be considered to indicate the direct composite restorations.