五种不同的自体乳房再造术前和术中成像方法的可行性。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6
K F Schrögendorfer, S Nickl, M Keck, D B Lumenta, C Loewe, M Gschwandtner, W Haslik, J Nedomansky
{"title":"五种不同的自体乳房再造术前和术中成像方法的可行性。","authors":"K F Schrögendorfer,&nbsp;S Nickl,&nbsp;M Keck,&nbsp;D B Lumenta,&nbsp;C Loewe,&nbsp;M Gschwandtner,&nbsp;W Haslik,&nbsp;J Nedomansky","doi":"10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous breast reconstruction is an integral part in the treatment of breast cancer. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an established preoperative diagnostic tool for microsurgeons, no study has so far evaluated and compared five different imaging methods and their value for the reconstructive team. In order to determine the feasibility of each of the tools for routine or specialized diagnostic application, the methods' efficiency and informative value were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed imaging data of 41 patients used for perforator location and assessment for regional perfusion and vessel patency in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), or transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap (TMG). Five different imaging techniques were used: hand held Doppler (HHD), CT angiography (CTA), macroscopic indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography, microscope-integrated ICG video angiography, and laser Doppler imaging (LDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTA proved to be the best tool for preoperative determination of the highly variable anatomy of the abdominal region, whereas HHD showed the same information on perforator localization with some false-positive results. Intraoperative HHD was an excellent tool for dissection and vessel patency judgment. Microscope-integrated ICG was an excellent tool to document the patency of microanastomoses. In our series, macroscopic perfusion measurement with ICG or LDI was only justified in special situations, where information on perfusion of abdominal or mastectomy flaps was required. LDI did not add any additional information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative assessment should be performed by CTA with verification of the perforator location by HHD. Intraoperative HHD and microscope-integrated ICG contribute most toward the evaluation of vessel patency. ICG and LDI should only be used for special indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50475,"journal":{"name":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability of five different pre- and intraoperative imaging methods for autologous breast reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"K F Schrögendorfer,&nbsp;S Nickl,&nbsp;M Keck,&nbsp;D B Lumenta,&nbsp;C Loewe,&nbsp;M Gschwandtner,&nbsp;W Haslik,&nbsp;J Nedomansky\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous breast reconstruction is an integral part in the treatment of breast cancer. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an established preoperative diagnostic tool for microsurgeons, no study has so far evaluated and compared five different imaging methods and their value for the reconstructive team. In order to determine the feasibility of each of the tools for routine or specialized diagnostic application, the methods' efficiency and informative value were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed imaging data of 41 patients used for perforator location and assessment for regional perfusion and vessel patency in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), or transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap (TMG). Five different imaging techniques were used: hand held Doppler (HHD), CT angiography (CTA), macroscopic indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography, microscope-integrated ICG video angiography, and laser Doppler imaging (LDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTA proved to be the best tool for preoperative determination of the highly variable anatomy of the abdominal region, whereas HHD showed the same information on perforator localization with some false-positive results. Intraoperative HHD was an excellent tool for dissection and vessel patency judgment. Microscope-integrated ICG was an excellent tool to document the patency of microanastomoses. In our series, macroscopic perfusion measurement with ICG or LDI was only justified in special situations, where information on perfusion of abdominal or mastectomy flaps was required. LDI did not add any additional information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative assessment should be performed by CTA with verification of the perforator location by HHD. Intraoperative HHD and microscope-integrated ICG contribute most toward the evaluation of vessel patency. ICG and LDI should only be used for special indications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-016-0449-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:自体乳房再造术是乳腺癌治疗的重要组成部分。虽然计算机断层血管造影(CTA)是一种成熟的显微外科术前诊断工具,但迄今为止还没有研究评估和比较五种不同的成像方法及其对重建团队的价值。为了确定每种工具用于常规或专业诊断的可行性,分析了方法的效率和信息价值。方法:回顾性分析41例应用上下腹深穿支皮瓣(DIEP)、腹直肌横瓣(TRAM)、股薄肌横肌瓣(TMG)行自体乳房再造术的患者穿支定位及区域血流灌注和血管通畅情况的影像学资料。采用五种不同的成像技术:手持多普勒(HHD)、CT血管造影(CTA)、宏观吲哚菁绿(ICG)视频血管造影、显微镜集成ICG视频血管造影和激光多普勒成像(LDI)。结果:CTA被证明是术前确定腹部高度可变解剖结构的最佳工具,而HHD在穿支定位方面显示的信息相同,但存在一些假阳性结果。术中HHD是解剖和判断血管通畅的良好工具。显微集成ICG是记录微吻合口通畅的良好工具。在我们的研究中,ICG或LDI的宏观灌注测量仅在需要腹部或乳房切除术皮瓣灌注信息的特殊情况下才合理。LDI没有添加任何额外的信息。结论:术前评估应通过CTA进行,并通过HHD验证穿支位置。术中HHD和镜下综合ICG对血管通畅的评价最有帮助。ICG和LDI仅用于特殊适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Viability of five different pre- and intraoperative imaging methods for autologous breast reconstruction.

Background: Autologous breast reconstruction is an integral part in the treatment of breast cancer. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an established preoperative diagnostic tool for microsurgeons, no study has so far evaluated and compared five different imaging methods and their value for the reconstructive team. In order to determine the feasibility of each of the tools for routine or specialized diagnostic application, the methods' efficiency and informative value were analyzed.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed imaging data of 41 patients used for perforator location and assessment for regional perfusion and vessel patency in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), or transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap (TMG). Five different imaging techniques were used: hand held Doppler (HHD), CT angiography (CTA), macroscopic indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography, microscope-integrated ICG video angiography, and laser Doppler imaging (LDI).

Results: CTA proved to be the best tool for preoperative determination of the highly variable anatomy of the abdominal region, whereas HHD showed the same information on perforator localization with some false-positive results. Intraoperative HHD was an excellent tool for dissection and vessel patency judgment. Microscope-integrated ICG was an excellent tool to document the patency of microanastomoses. In our series, macroscopic perfusion measurement with ICG or LDI was only justified in special situations, where information on perfusion of abdominal or mastectomy flaps was required. LDI did not add any additional information.

Conclusion: Preoperative assessment should be performed by CTA with verification of the perforator location by HHD. Intraoperative HHD and microscope-integrated ICG contribute most toward the evaluation of vessel patency. ICG and LDI should only be used for special indications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal European Surgery – Acta Chirurgica Austriaca focuses on general surgery, endocrine surgery, thoracic surgery, heart and vascular surgery. Special features include new surgical and endoscopic techniques such as minimally invasive surgery, robot surgery, and advances in surgery-related biotechnology and surgical oncology. The journal especially addresses benign and malignant esophageal diseases, i.e. achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. In keeping with modern healthcare requirements, the journal’s scope includes inter- and multidisciplinary disease management (diagnosis, therapy and surveillance).
期刊最新文献
Remote training and evaluation of a simulator-based training course for complex endovascular procedures. Training in vascular trauma surgery for non-vascular surgeons: Vascular trauma surgery skills course. Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Surgery. Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1