估算医疗保健感知质量的社会网络方法。

Q3 Nursing Open Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2017-10-31 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874434601711010219
Giulia Carletti, Nicola Soriani, Martina Mattiazzi, Dario Gregori
{"title":"估算医疗保健感知质量的社会网络方法。","authors":"Giulia Carletti, Nicola Soriani, Martina Mattiazzi, Dario Gregori","doi":"10.2174/1874434601711010219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring service quality aids health care providers to recognize specific and unmet needs of patients. Nevertheless, perceived quality of health care services (PQC) is often investigated with inadequate techniques which may lead to biased results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study is to develop a proof-of-concept for estimating the PQC using the scale-up estimator, with reference to a concrete assessment in patients of a major Oncology Hospital in Veneto (IOV). Results have then been compared with those collected by the Customer Relations Office (CRO) after the annual survey conducted with traditional questionnaire based techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven hundred and eighty-three sets consisting of two questionnaires were handed out to IOV patients between 26 and 28 November 2012. The first questionnaire was the CRO annual one composed by 15 direct questions about the perception of quality satisfaction rate using a Likert scale. The second questionnaire was the scale-up (NSUM) one, composed by 20 indirect questions, 5 of which were reproducing the main target of CRO for estimating PQC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparisons made over 299 sets of questionnaires showed differences between the two techniques. Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) questionnaire seems to be able to produce lower estimates of PQC with respect to the CRO annual questionnaire. In some cases, the NSUM showed dissatisfaction rates which are 20-fold higher respect to CRO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NSUM could be a promising method for assessing the perceived quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":38868,"journal":{"name":"Open Nursing Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"219-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Social Network Approach to the Estimation of Perceived Quality of Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Carletti, Nicola Soriani, Martina Mattiazzi, Dario Gregori\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874434601711010219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring service quality aids health care providers to recognize specific and unmet needs of patients. Nevertheless, perceived quality of health care services (PQC) is often investigated with inadequate techniques which may lead to biased results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study is to develop a proof-of-concept for estimating the PQC using the scale-up estimator, with reference to a concrete assessment in patients of a major Oncology Hospital in Veneto (IOV). Results have then been compared with those collected by the Customer Relations Office (CRO) after the annual survey conducted with traditional questionnaire based techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven hundred and eighty-three sets consisting of two questionnaires were handed out to IOV patients between 26 and 28 November 2012. The first questionnaire was the CRO annual one composed by 15 direct questions about the perception of quality satisfaction rate using a Likert scale. The second questionnaire was the scale-up (NSUM) one, composed by 20 indirect questions, 5 of which were reproducing the main target of CRO for estimating PQC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparisons made over 299 sets of questionnaires showed differences between the two techniques. Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) questionnaire seems to be able to produce lower estimates of PQC with respect to the CRO annual questionnaire. In some cases, the NSUM showed dissatisfaction rates which are 20-fold higher respect to CRO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NSUM could be a promising method for assessing the perceived quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"219-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:衡量服务质量有助于医疗服务提供者认识到患者的具体需求和未得到满足的需求。然而,医疗服务的感知质量(PQC)往往是通过不适当的技术进行调查的,这可能会导致结果有偏差:本研究的目的是参照威尼托(Veneto)一家大型肿瘤医院(IOV)对患者进行的具体评估,开发出一种使用扩大估算器估算 PQC 的概念验证方法。然后将结果与客户关系办公室(CRO)在使用传统问卷技术进行年度调查后收集的结果进行比较:2012 年 11 月 26 日至 28 日期间,向 IOV 患者发放了两份问卷,共七百八十三份。第一份问卷是 CRO 年度问卷,由 15 个关于质量满意度的直接问题组成,采用李克特量表。第二份问卷是扩大调查问卷(NSUM),由20个间接问题组成,其中5个问题再现了CRO估算PQC的主要目标:结果:对 299 套问卷进行的比较显示,两种技术之间存在差异。与 CRO 年度问卷相比,网络扩展法(NSUM)问卷似乎能得出较低的 PQC 估计值。在某些情况下,NSUM 的不满意率比 CRO 高出 20 倍:结论:NSUM 是一种很有前途的评估医疗质量感知的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Social Network Approach to the Estimation of Perceived Quality of Health Care.

Background: Measuring service quality aids health care providers to recognize specific and unmet needs of patients. Nevertheless, perceived quality of health care services (PQC) is often investigated with inadequate techniques which may lead to biased results.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to develop a proof-of-concept for estimating the PQC using the scale-up estimator, with reference to a concrete assessment in patients of a major Oncology Hospital in Veneto (IOV). Results have then been compared with those collected by the Customer Relations Office (CRO) after the annual survey conducted with traditional questionnaire based techniques.

Material and methods: Seven hundred and eighty-three sets consisting of two questionnaires were handed out to IOV patients between 26 and 28 November 2012. The first questionnaire was the CRO annual one composed by 15 direct questions about the perception of quality satisfaction rate using a Likert scale. The second questionnaire was the scale-up (NSUM) one, composed by 20 indirect questions, 5 of which were reproducing the main target of CRO for estimating PQC.

Results: The comparisons made over 299 sets of questionnaires showed differences between the two techniques. Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) questionnaire seems to be able to produce lower estimates of PQC with respect to the CRO annual questionnaire. In some cases, the NSUM showed dissatisfaction rates which are 20-fold higher respect to CRO.

Conclusion: NSUM could be a promising method for assessing the perceived quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Nursing Journal
Open Nursing Journal Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Open Nursing Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of nursing. The Open Nursing Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide. We welcome papers related to nursing and midwifery, with specific relevance to health care practice, policy and research. We publish under the following themes: -Nursing and Midwifery practice -Education -Research methodology -Evidence based practice -New role in practice -Systematic reviews -Case studies -Ethical and professional issues -Management in health care -Sustainability in health and health care provision All authors should make clear how the implications of their paper for nursing, midwifery and health care practice. They should also clearly identify the ‘take home message’ from their paper.
期刊最新文献
Management Practices Promoting Sustained Implementation of the Quality Register Senior Alert for Older Adults in Municipal Care in Sweden. Nurse Managers' Emotional Intelligence and Effective Leadership: A Review of Current Evidence. Effectiveness of the "Create Sensitivity" Caring Model on Blood Glucose/ Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Depressive Symptoms and Complications Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Gender Differences. Persistent (Anxiety and Depression) Affected Academic Achievement and Absenteeism in Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1