Maria Kassapidou, Victoria Franke Stenport, Lars Hjalmarsson, Carina B Johansson
{"title":"钴铬合金在瑞典固定修复中的应用。","authors":"Maria Kassapidou, Victoria Franke Stenport, Lars Hjalmarsson, Carina B Johansson","doi":"10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to compile the usage of Co-Cr alloys in fixed prosthodontics (FP) among dental laboratories in Sweden. <b>Methods:</b> From March to October 2015, questionnaires were sent to 542 registered dental laboratories in Sweden. The questionnaires were divided in two parts, one for fixed dental-supported prosthodontics (FDP) and one for fixed implant-supported prosthodontics (FIP). Reminders were sent three times. <b>Results:</b> In total of 542 dental laboratories, 55% answered the questionnaires. Most dental laboratories use Co-Cr in FP, 134 (74%) in FDP and 89(66%) in FIP. The laboratories used Co-Cr alloys of various compositions in the prostheses, 35 for FDP and 30 for FIP. The most commonly used Co-Cr alloys for tooth-supported FDPs were (a) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> 280, (b) Cara SLM and (c) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> C. For implant-supported frameworks the frequently used alloys were: (a) Cara SLM, (b) Cara Milled and (c) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> 280. Except for the difference in composition of these alloys, they were also manufactured with various techniques. In tooth-supported prostheses the dominating technique was the cast technique while newer techniques as laser-sintering and milling were more commonly reported for implant-supported constructions. A fourth technique; the 'pre-state' milling was reported in FDP. <b>Conclusion:</b> More than 30 different Co-Cr alloys were reported as being used in FP. Thus, there is a need for studies exploring the mechanical and physical behavior and the biological response to the most commonly used Co-Cr alloys.</p>","PeriodicalId":6997,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"3 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cobalt-chromium alloys in fixed prosthodontics in Sweden.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Kassapidou, Victoria Franke Stenport, Lars Hjalmarsson, Carina B Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to compile the usage of Co-Cr alloys in fixed prosthodontics (FP) among dental laboratories in Sweden. <b>Methods:</b> From March to October 2015, questionnaires were sent to 542 registered dental laboratories in Sweden. The questionnaires were divided in two parts, one for fixed dental-supported prosthodontics (FDP) and one for fixed implant-supported prosthodontics (FIP). Reminders were sent three times. <b>Results:</b> In total of 542 dental laboratories, 55% answered the questionnaires. Most dental laboratories use Co-Cr in FP, 134 (74%) in FDP and 89(66%) in FIP. The laboratories used Co-Cr alloys of various compositions in the prostheses, 35 for FDP and 30 for FIP. The most commonly used Co-Cr alloys for tooth-supported FDPs were (a) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> 280, (b) Cara SLM and (c) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> C. For implant-supported frameworks the frequently used alloys were: (a) Cara SLM, (b) Cara Milled and (c) Wirobond<sup>®</sup> 280. Except for the difference in composition of these alloys, they were also manufactured with various techniques. In tooth-supported prostheses the dominating technique was the cast technique while newer techniques as laser-sintering and milling were more commonly reported for implant-supported constructions. A fourth technique; the 'pre-state' milling was reported in FDP. <b>Conclusion:</b> More than 30 different Co-Cr alloys were reported as being used in FP. Thus, there is a need for studies exploring the mechanical and physical behavior and the biological response to the most commonly used Co-Cr alloys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"53-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是汇编Co-Cr合金在瑞典牙科实验室固定修复(FP)中的使用情况。方法:2015年3月至10月,向瑞典542家注册牙科实验室发放问卷。问卷分为两部分,固定牙体支持修复(FDP)和固定种植体支持修复(FIP)。提醒发送了三次。结果:共有542家口腔实验室,55%的人回答了问卷。大多数牙科实验室在FP中使用钴铬,在FDP中使用134(74%),在FIP中使用89(66%)。实验室在假体中使用不同成分的Co-Cr合金,35用于FDP, 30用于FIP。牙支撑fdp最常用的Co-Cr合金是(a) Wirobond®280,(b) Cara SLM和(c) Wirobond®c。对于种植支撑框架,最常用的合金是:(a) Cara SLM, (b) Cara milling和(c) Wirobond®280。除了这些合金的成分不同外,它们的制造工艺也各不相同。在牙齿支持的修复体中,主要的技术是铸造技术,而较新的技术如激光烧结和铣削更常被报道用于种植体支持的结构。第四种技巧;FDP报告了“预状态”铣削。结论:有30多种不同的Co-Cr合金被报道用于FP。因此,有必要对最常用的Co-Cr合金的力学和物理行为以及生物反应进行研究。
Cobalt-chromium alloys in fixed prosthodontics in Sweden.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compile the usage of Co-Cr alloys in fixed prosthodontics (FP) among dental laboratories in Sweden. Methods: From March to October 2015, questionnaires were sent to 542 registered dental laboratories in Sweden. The questionnaires were divided in two parts, one for fixed dental-supported prosthodontics (FDP) and one for fixed implant-supported prosthodontics (FIP). Reminders were sent three times. Results: In total of 542 dental laboratories, 55% answered the questionnaires. Most dental laboratories use Co-Cr in FP, 134 (74%) in FDP and 89(66%) in FIP. The laboratories used Co-Cr alloys of various compositions in the prostheses, 35 for FDP and 30 for FIP. The most commonly used Co-Cr alloys for tooth-supported FDPs were (a) Wirobond® 280, (b) Cara SLM and (c) Wirobond® C. For implant-supported frameworks the frequently used alloys were: (a) Cara SLM, (b) Cara Milled and (c) Wirobond® 280. Except for the difference in composition of these alloys, they were also manufactured with various techniques. In tooth-supported prostheses the dominating technique was the cast technique while newer techniques as laser-sintering and milling were more commonly reported for implant-supported constructions. A fourth technique; the 'pre-state' milling was reported in FDP. Conclusion: More than 30 different Co-Cr alloys were reported as being used in FP. Thus, there is a need for studies exploring the mechanical and physical behavior and the biological response to the most commonly used Co-Cr alloys.