基于中国传染病自动预警和反应系统的“暴发金标准”选择为传染病预警提供优化阈值。

Rui-Ping Wang, Yong-Gen Jiang, Gen-Ming Zhao, Xiao-Qin Guo, Engelgau Michael
{"title":"基于中国传染病自动预警和反应系统的“暴发金标准”选择为传染病预警提供优化阈值。","authors":"Rui-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Yong-Gen Jiang,&nbsp;Gen-Ming Zhao,&nbsp;Xiao-Qin Guo,&nbsp;Engelgau Michael","doi":"10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS) was successfully implemented and became operational nationwide in 2008. The CIDARS plays an important role in and has been integrated into the routine outbreak monitoring efforts of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) at all levels in China. In the CIDARS, thresholds are determined using the \"Mean+2SD‟ in the early stage which have limitations. This study compared the performance of optimized thresholds defined using the \"Mean +2SD‟ method to the performance of 5 novel algorithms to select optimal \"Outbreak Gold Standard (OGS)‟ and corresponding thresholds for outbreak detection. Data for infectious disease were organized by calendar week and year. The \"Mean+2SD‟, C1, C2, moving average (MA), seasonal model (SM), and cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithms were applied. Outbreak signals for the predicted value (Px) were calculated using a percentile-based moving window. When the outbreak signals generated by an algorithm were in line with a Px generated outbreak signal for each week, this Px was then defined as the optimized threshold for that algorithm. In this study, six infectious diseases were selected and classified into TYPE A (chickenpox and mumps), TYPE B (influenza and rubella) and TYPE C [hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and scarlet fever]. Optimized thresholds for chickenpox (P<sub>55</sub>), mumps (P<sub>50</sub>), influenza (P<sub>40</sub>, P<sub>55</sub>, and P<sub>75</sub>), rubella (P<sub>45</sub> and P<sub>75</sub>), HFMD (P<sub>65</sub> and P<sub>70</sub>), and scarlet fever (P<sub>75</sub> and P<sub>80</sub>) were identified. The C1, C2, CUSUM, SM, and MA algorithms were appropriate for TYPE A. All 6 algorithms were appropriate for TYPE B. C1 and CUSUM algorithms were appropriate for TYPE C. It is critical to incorporate more flexible algorithms as OGS into the CIDRAS and to identify the proper OGS and corresponding recommended optimized threshold by different infectious disease types.</p>","PeriodicalId":15925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","volume":"37 6","pages":"833-841"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Outbreak Gold Standard' selection to provide optimized threshold for infectious diseases early-alert based on China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System.\",\"authors\":\"Rui-Ping Wang,&nbsp;Yong-Gen Jiang,&nbsp;Gen-Ming Zhao,&nbsp;Xiao-Qin Guo,&nbsp;Engelgau Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS) was successfully implemented and became operational nationwide in 2008. The CIDARS plays an important role in and has been integrated into the routine outbreak monitoring efforts of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) at all levels in China. In the CIDARS, thresholds are determined using the \\\"Mean+2SD‟ in the early stage which have limitations. This study compared the performance of optimized thresholds defined using the \\\"Mean +2SD‟ method to the performance of 5 novel algorithms to select optimal \\\"Outbreak Gold Standard (OGS)‟ and corresponding thresholds for outbreak detection. Data for infectious disease were organized by calendar week and year. The \\\"Mean+2SD‟, C1, C2, moving average (MA), seasonal model (SM), and cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithms were applied. Outbreak signals for the predicted value (Px) were calculated using a percentile-based moving window. When the outbreak signals generated by an algorithm were in line with a Px generated outbreak signal for each week, this Px was then defined as the optimized threshold for that algorithm. In this study, six infectious diseases were selected and classified into TYPE A (chickenpox and mumps), TYPE B (influenza and rubella) and TYPE C [hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and scarlet fever]. Optimized thresholds for chickenpox (P<sub>55</sub>), mumps (P<sub>50</sub>), influenza (P<sub>40</sub>, P<sub>55</sub>, and P<sub>75</sub>), rubella (P<sub>45</sub> and P<sub>75</sub>), HFMD (P<sub>65</sub> and P<sub>70</sub>), and scarlet fever (P<sub>75</sub> and P<sub>80</sub>) were identified. The C1, C2, CUSUM, SM, and MA algorithms were appropriate for TYPE A. All 6 algorithms were appropriate for TYPE B. C1 and CUSUM algorithms were appropriate for TYPE C. It is critical to incorporate more flexible algorithms as OGS into the CIDRAS and to identify the proper OGS and corresponding recommended optimized threshold by different infectious disease types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"833-841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1814-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

中国传染病自动预警响应系统(CIDARS)于2008年成功实施并在全国投入运行。CIDARS在中国各级疾病预防控制中心的常规疫情监测工作中发挥着重要作用,并已被纳入其中。在CIDARS中,阈值是在早期使用“平均值+2SD”确定的,这有局限性。本研究将使用“Mean +2SD”方法定义的优化阈值的性能与5种新算法的性能进行比较,以选择最优的“爆发金标准(OGS)”和相应的爆发检测阈值。传染病的数据按日历周和年组织。采用“Mean+2SD”、C1、C2、移动平均(MA)、季节模型(SM)和累积和(CUSUM)算法。使用基于百分位数的移动窗口计算预测值(Px)的爆发信号。当算法生成的爆发信号与每周生成的Px爆发信号一致时,该Px被定义为该算法的优化阈值。本研究选取6种传染病,将其分为A型(水痘和腮腺炎)、B型(流感和风疹)和C型(手足口病和猩红热)。确定了水痘(P55)、腮腺炎(P50)、流感(P40、P55和P75)、风疹(P45和P75)、手足口病(P65和P70)和猩红热(P75和P80)的最佳阈值。C1、C2、CUSUM、SM和MA算法适用于a型。6种算法均适用于b型。C1和CUSUM算法适用于c型。关键是要将更灵活的OGS算法纳入CIDRAS,并根据不同的传染病类型确定合适的OGS和相应的推荐优化阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Outbreak Gold Standard' selection to provide optimized threshold for infectious diseases early-alert based on China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System.

The China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System (CIDARS) was successfully implemented and became operational nationwide in 2008. The CIDARS plays an important role in and has been integrated into the routine outbreak monitoring efforts of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) at all levels in China. In the CIDARS, thresholds are determined using the "Mean+2SD‟ in the early stage which have limitations. This study compared the performance of optimized thresholds defined using the "Mean +2SD‟ method to the performance of 5 novel algorithms to select optimal "Outbreak Gold Standard (OGS)‟ and corresponding thresholds for outbreak detection. Data for infectious disease were organized by calendar week and year. The "Mean+2SD‟, C1, C2, moving average (MA), seasonal model (SM), and cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithms were applied. Outbreak signals for the predicted value (Px) were calculated using a percentile-based moving window. When the outbreak signals generated by an algorithm were in line with a Px generated outbreak signal for each week, this Px was then defined as the optimized threshold for that algorithm. In this study, six infectious diseases were selected and classified into TYPE A (chickenpox and mumps), TYPE B (influenza and rubella) and TYPE C [hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and scarlet fever]. Optimized thresholds for chickenpox (P55), mumps (P50), influenza (P40, P55, and P75), rubella (P45 and P75), HFMD (P65 and P70), and scarlet fever (P75 and P80) were identified. The C1, C2, CUSUM, SM, and MA algorithms were appropriate for TYPE A. All 6 algorithms were appropriate for TYPE B. C1 and CUSUM algorithms were appropriate for TYPE C. It is critical to incorporate more flexible algorithms as OGS into the CIDRAS and to identify the proper OGS and corresponding recommended optimized threshold by different infectious disease types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.08
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A modified surgical approach of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer: Report of two cases and literature review. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation: A single-center data analysis. Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring different types of EGFR mutations: A retrospective analysis. Look into hepatic progenitor cell associated trait: Histological heterogeneity of hepatitis B-related combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Knockdown of GRHL3 inhibits activities and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human colorectal cancer cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1