“远大前程”:我们的病人与查尔斯·狄更斯笔下人物可能的相似之处的思考。

Q1 Medicine Joints Pub Date : 2017-10-13 eCollection Date: 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1607230
Giuseppe Milano
{"title":"“远大前程”:我们的病人与查尔斯·狄更斯笔下人物可能的相似之处的思考。","authors":"Giuseppe Milano","doi":"10.1055/s-0037-1607230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of Joints, we publish an interesting article by Lawrence and colleagues entitled “Expectations of Shoulder SurgeryarenotAlteredbySurgeonCounselingof the Patient.”1 The authors of this article conducted a valid analysis of a population of patients who had consented to undergo shoulder surgery. Using a dedicated interview tool (Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey by the Hospital for Special Surgery), they measured the expectations of these patients regarding the proposed treatment. Thiswas doneboth before and after appropriate and standardized preoperative counseling, which was provided at patients’ first visit, when they consented to the treatment. The data analysis showed that information provided to the patients by the physician produced no significant variation in the expectations of patients regarding the treatment, and these expectations were not significantly correlated with sociodemographic factors or variables related to the type of surgery. As the authors themselves suggest, this study prompts us to reflect upon two questions that assume considerable strategic value in modernmedicine, given that these are increasingly based on the needs of the patients and careful evaluation of the real “value” of the treatment they may receive:2 What influences a patient’s expectations regarding a treatment and to what extent, are these expectations shaped or modified by physician counseling? Although it has been shown that the subjective improvement produced by a treatment is often proportional to the patient’s expectations,3 it is also true that allowing the patient to develop expectations that are disproportionate to the estimated and expected effect of a treatment may increase the risk of an unsatisfactory, and even disappointing, subjective outcome. The expectations formed by orthopaedic patients depend on several variables (age, gender, type of activity, type of surgery, etc.), many of which have been analyzed with conflicting results, possibly because of confounding factors.4–8 Among these variables, patient information appears to play a key role and therefore impacts the potential patient satisfaction at follow-up. However, the literature is not unanimous on this point either,5,9 and this leads researchers, like Lawrence and colleagues,1 to question the adequacy and effectiveness of our current physician–patient communication strategies. Specialist counseling will furnish patients with a considerable amountof information that theymayendup forgettingor even fail to take in, but at the same time, doctors are not using potentially more effective means of communication to their best advantage. One of these, not to be underestimated, is communication through social media. Internet is, indeed, full of medical information allowing patients to find out about their condition and treatment and prepare for their medical consultation, but online medical information tends to be exchanged between lay users and on social media platforms. Moreover, it is known that health care providers are reluctant to engage in online interactions with patients through these channels, and indeed are often tacitly or openly opposed to this type of communication.10 A further consideration is that published research on this topic consists of observational studies that analyze a situation at a given time and, may be for this reason, report conflicting results. Indeed, expectations, bydefinition, concern theperception of an event or condition that has not yet come about and can thereforeonlybe imagined; as such, thesechangeover time as a result of events, new information, and encounters thatmay precede or follow the medical consultation. Although this consultation isameeting thatcancertainlymodify thepatient’s expectations, we cannot say how long this takes to occur; it is likely that each individual processes information at a different rate and in a different way, which depends on his/her perceptions of his/her condition, the cultural tools he/she is able to draw upon to interpret information, his/her coping strategies, and all the other factors that have played a part in generating his/her expectations up to that point. Sometimes, “great expectations,” as we see in the homonymous novel by Charles","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"5 3","pages":"131-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0037-1607230","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Great Expectations\\\": Reflections on Possible Analogies between our Patients and the Characters of Charles Dickens.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Milano\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0037-1607230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue of Joints, we publish an interesting article by Lawrence and colleagues entitled “Expectations of Shoulder SurgeryarenotAlteredbySurgeonCounselingof the Patient.”1 The authors of this article conducted a valid analysis of a population of patients who had consented to undergo shoulder surgery. Using a dedicated interview tool (Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey by the Hospital for Special Surgery), they measured the expectations of these patients regarding the proposed treatment. Thiswas doneboth before and after appropriate and standardized preoperative counseling, which was provided at patients’ first visit, when they consented to the treatment. The data analysis showed that information provided to the patients by the physician produced no significant variation in the expectations of patients regarding the treatment, and these expectations were not significantly correlated with sociodemographic factors or variables related to the type of surgery. As the authors themselves suggest, this study prompts us to reflect upon two questions that assume considerable strategic value in modernmedicine, given that these are increasingly based on the needs of the patients and careful evaluation of the real “value” of the treatment they may receive:2 What influences a patient’s expectations regarding a treatment and to what extent, are these expectations shaped or modified by physician counseling? Although it has been shown that the subjective improvement produced by a treatment is often proportional to the patient’s expectations,3 it is also true that allowing the patient to develop expectations that are disproportionate to the estimated and expected effect of a treatment may increase the risk of an unsatisfactory, and even disappointing, subjective outcome. The expectations formed by orthopaedic patients depend on several variables (age, gender, type of activity, type of surgery, etc.), many of which have been analyzed with conflicting results, possibly because of confounding factors.4–8 Among these variables, patient information appears to play a key role and therefore impacts the potential patient satisfaction at follow-up. However, the literature is not unanimous on this point either,5,9 and this leads researchers, like Lawrence and colleagues,1 to question the adequacy and effectiveness of our current physician–patient communication strategies. Specialist counseling will furnish patients with a considerable amountof information that theymayendup forgettingor even fail to take in, but at the same time, doctors are not using potentially more effective means of communication to their best advantage. One of these, not to be underestimated, is communication through social media. Internet is, indeed, full of medical information allowing patients to find out about their condition and treatment and prepare for their medical consultation, but online medical information tends to be exchanged between lay users and on social media platforms. Moreover, it is known that health care providers are reluctant to engage in online interactions with patients through these channels, and indeed are often tacitly or openly opposed to this type of communication.10 A further consideration is that published research on this topic consists of observational studies that analyze a situation at a given time and, may be for this reason, report conflicting results. Indeed, expectations, bydefinition, concern theperception of an event or condition that has not yet come about and can thereforeonlybe imagined; as such, thesechangeover time as a result of events, new information, and encounters thatmay precede or follow the medical consultation. Although this consultation isameeting thatcancertainlymodify thepatient’s expectations, we cannot say how long this takes to occur; it is likely that each individual processes information at a different rate and in a different way, which depends on his/her perceptions of his/her condition, the cultural tools he/she is able to draw upon to interpret information, his/her coping strategies, and all the other factors that have played a part in generating his/her expectations up to that point. Sometimes, “great expectations,” as we see in the homonymous novel by Charles\",\"PeriodicalId\":37852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joints\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"131-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0037-1607230\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joints\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Great Expectations": Reflections on Possible Analogies between our Patients and the Characters of Charles Dickens.
In this issue of Joints, we publish an interesting article by Lawrence and colleagues entitled “Expectations of Shoulder SurgeryarenotAlteredbySurgeonCounselingof the Patient.”1 The authors of this article conducted a valid analysis of a population of patients who had consented to undergo shoulder surgery. Using a dedicated interview tool (Shoulder Surgery Expectations Survey by the Hospital for Special Surgery), they measured the expectations of these patients regarding the proposed treatment. Thiswas doneboth before and after appropriate and standardized preoperative counseling, which was provided at patients’ first visit, when they consented to the treatment. The data analysis showed that information provided to the patients by the physician produced no significant variation in the expectations of patients regarding the treatment, and these expectations were not significantly correlated with sociodemographic factors or variables related to the type of surgery. As the authors themselves suggest, this study prompts us to reflect upon two questions that assume considerable strategic value in modernmedicine, given that these are increasingly based on the needs of the patients and careful evaluation of the real “value” of the treatment they may receive:2 What influences a patient’s expectations regarding a treatment and to what extent, are these expectations shaped or modified by physician counseling? Although it has been shown that the subjective improvement produced by a treatment is often proportional to the patient’s expectations,3 it is also true that allowing the patient to develop expectations that are disproportionate to the estimated and expected effect of a treatment may increase the risk of an unsatisfactory, and even disappointing, subjective outcome. The expectations formed by orthopaedic patients depend on several variables (age, gender, type of activity, type of surgery, etc.), many of which have been analyzed with conflicting results, possibly because of confounding factors.4–8 Among these variables, patient information appears to play a key role and therefore impacts the potential patient satisfaction at follow-up. However, the literature is not unanimous on this point either,5,9 and this leads researchers, like Lawrence and colleagues,1 to question the adequacy and effectiveness of our current physician–patient communication strategies. Specialist counseling will furnish patients with a considerable amountof information that theymayendup forgettingor even fail to take in, but at the same time, doctors are not using potentially more effective means of communication to their best advantage. One of these, not to be underestimated, is communication through social media. Internet is, indeed, full of medical information allowing patients to find out about their condition and treatment and prepare for their medical consultation, but online medical information tends to be exchanged between lay users and on social media platforms. Moreover, it is known that health care providers are reluctant to engage in online interactions with patients through these channels, and indeed are often tacitly or openly opposed to this type of communication.10 A further consideration is that published research on this topic consists of observational studies that analyze a situation at a given time and, may be for this reason, report conflicting results. Indeed, expectations, bydefinition, concern theperception of an event or condition that has not yet come about and can thereforeonlybe imagined; as such, thesechangeover time as a result of events, new information, and encounters thatmay precede or follow the medical consultation. Although this consultation isameeting thatcancertainlymodify thepatient’s expectations, we cannot say how long this takes to occur; it is likely that each individual processes information at a different rate and in a different way, which depends on his/her perceptions of his/her condition, the cultural tools he/she is able to draw upon to interpret information, his/her coping strategies, and all the other factors that have played a part in generating his/her expectations up to that point. Sometimes, “great expectations,” as we see in the homonymous novel by Charles
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Midterm Results. Hip and Groin Pain in Soccer Players. Acute Groin Pain Syndrome Due to Internal Obturator Muscle Injury in a Professional Football Player. Short-Term Outcomes of the Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison between First and Second Generation Delta Prosthesis. The Relationship between Kinesiophobia and Return to Sport after Shoulder Surgery for Recurrent Anterior Instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1