PPIs时代佐林格-埃利森综合征的诊断,错误的胃泌素检测,敏感的成像和有限的酸分泌测试。

IF 1.2 International Journal of Endocrine Oncology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-11 DOI:10.2217/ije-2017-0018
David C Metz, Guillaume Cadiot, Pierre Poitras, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen
{"title":"PPIs时代佐林格-埃利森综合征的诊断,错误的胃泌素检测,敏感的成像和有限的酸分泌测试。","authors":"David C Metz,&nbsp;Guillaume Cadiot,&nbsp;Pierre Poitras,&nbsp;Tetsuhide Ito,&nbsp;Robert T Jensen","doi":"10.2217/ije-2017-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years the diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) has become increasingly controversial with several new approaches and criteria proposed, differing from the classical biochemical criterion of inappropriate hypergastrinemia (i.e., hypergastrinemia in the presence of hyperchlorhydria) (Table 1). These changes have come about because of the difficulty and potential dangers of stopping proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for gastric acid analysis; the recognition than many of the current assays used to assess gastrin concentrations are unreliable; the development of sensitive imaging modalities that detect neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) including an increasing number of the primary gastrinomas; the increased use of percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed biopsies/cytology and the general lack of availability of acid secretory testing. In this article we will discuss the basis for these controversies, review the proposed changes in diagnostic approaches and make recommendations for supporting the diagnosis of ZES in the modern era.</p>","PeriodicalId":42691,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/ije-2017-0018","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in the era of PPIs, faulty gastrin assays, sensitive imaging and limited access to acid secretory testing.\",\"authors\":\"David C Metz,&nbsp;Guillaume Cadiot,&nbsp;Pierre Poitras,&nbsp;Tetsuhide Ito,&nbsp;Robert T Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/ije-2017-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years the diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) has become increasingly controversial with several new approaches and criteria proposed, differing from the classical biochemical criterion of inappropriate hypergastrinemia (i.e., hypergastrinemia in the presence of hyperchlorhydria) (Table 1). These changes have come about because of the difficulty and potential dangers of stopping proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for gastric acid analysis; the recognition than many of the current assays used to assess gastrin concentrations are unreliable; the development of sensitive imaging modalities that detect neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) including an increasing number of the primary gastrinomas; the increased use of percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed biopsies/cytology and the general lack of availability of acid secretory testing. In this article we will discuss the basis for these controversies, review the proposed changes in diagnostic approaches and make recommendations for supporting the diagnosis of ZES in the modern era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/ije-2017-0018\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/ije-2017-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endocrine Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/ije-2017-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

近年来,佐林格-埃里森综合征(Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, ZES)的诊断越来越有争议,提出了几种新的方法和标准,不同于不适当高胃泌素血症的经典生化标准(即高氯酸血症存在的高胃泌素血症)(表1)。这些变化的发生是因为停止质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)进行胃酸分析的困难和潜在危险;认识到许多目前用于评估胃泌素浓度的测定方法是不可靠的;检测神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)的敏感成像模式的发展,包括越来越多的原发性胃泌素瘤;经皮或内镜超声(EUS)指导下的活检/细胞学检查的使用增加,以及酸分泌检测的普遍缺乏。在本文中,我们将讨论这些争议的基础,回顾诊断方法的拟议变化,并为支持现代ZES的诊断提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in the era of PPIs, faulty gastrin assays, sensitive imaging and limited access to acid secretory testing.

In recent years the diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) has become increasingly controversial with several new approaches and criteria proposed, differing from the classical biochemical criterion of inappropriate hypergastrinemia (i.e., hypergastrinemia in the presence of hyperchlorhydria) (Table 1). These changes have come about because of the difficulty and potential dangers of stopping proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for gastric acid analysis; the recognition than many of the current assays used to assess gastrin concentrations are unreliable; the development of sensitive imaging modalities that detect neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) including an increasing number of the primary gastrinomas; the increased use of percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed biopsies/cytology and the general lack of availability of acid secretory testing. In this article we will discuss the basis for these controversies, review the proposed changes in diagnostic approaches and make recommendations for supporting the diagnosis of ZES in the modern era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Endocrine Oncology is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that helps the clinician to keep up to date with best practice in this fast-moving field. The journal highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. The journal presents the latest research findings in diagnosis and management of endocrine cancer, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. The journal welcomes the unsolicited submission of article proposals and original research manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant use of lenvatinib in locally advanced papillary thyroid carcinoma involving critical vessels Recurrence-free survival following aggressive multimodal treatment of an isolated recurrence of adrenocortical carcinoma French patient-reported experience of diagnosis, management and burden of neuroendocrine tumors Bad kits in the diagnosis of endocrine tumors Somatotroph adenomas: histological subtypes and predicted response to treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1