对称源自不对称还是对称源自对称?

Elizabeth W Kahney, Rajesh Ranjan, Ryan J Gleason, Xin Chen
{"title":"对称源自不对称还是对称源自对称?","authors":"Elizabeth W Kahney,&nbsp;Rajesh Ranjan,&nbsp;Ryan J Gleason,&nbsp;Xin Chen","doi":"10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The processes of DNA replication and mitosis allow the genetic information of a cell to be copied and transferred reliably to its daughter cells. However, if DNA replication and cell division were always performed in a symmetric manner, the result would be a cluster of tumor cells instead of a multicellular organism. Therefore, gaining a complete understanding of any complex living organism depends on learning how cells become different while faithfully maintaining the same genetic material. It is well recognized that the distinct epigenetic information contained in each cell type defines its unique gene expression program. Nevertheless, how epigenetic information contained in the parental cell is either maintained or changed in the daughter cells remains largely unknown. During the asymmetric cell division (ACD) of <i>Drosophila</i> male germline stem cells, our previous work revealed that preexisting histones are selectively retained in the renewed stem cell daughter, whereas newly synthesized histones are enriched in the differentiating daughter cell. We also found that randomized inheritance of preexisting histones versus newly synthesized histones results in both stem cell loss and progenitor germ cell tumor phenotypes, suggesting that programmed histone inheritance is a key epigenetic player for cells to either remember or reset cell fates. Here, we will discuss these findings in the context of current knowledge on DNA replication, polarized mitotic machinery, and ACD for both animal development and tissue homeostasis. We will also speculate on some potential mechanisms underlying asymmetric histone inheritance, which may be used in other biological events to achieve the asymmetric cell fates.</p>","PeriodicalId":72635,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology","volume":"82 ","pages":"305-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symmetry from Asymmetry or Asymmetry from Symmetry?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth W Kahney,&nbsp;Rajesh Ranjan,&nbsp;Ryan J Gleason,&nbsp;Xin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The processes of DNA replication and mitosis allow the genetic information of a cell to be copied and transferred reliably to its daughter cells. However, if DNA replication and cell division were always performed in a symmetric manner, the result would be a cluster of tumor cells instead of a multicellular organism. Therefore, gaining a complete understanding of any complex living organism depends on learning how cells become different while faithfully maintaining the same genetic material. It is well recognized that the distinct epigenetic information contained in each cell type defines its unique gene expression program. Nevertheless, how epigenetic information contained in the parental cell is either maintained or changed in the daughter cells remains largely unknown. During the asymmetric cell division (ACD) of <i>Drosophila</i> male germline stem cells, our previous work revealed that preexisting histones are selectively retained in the renewed stem cell daughter, whereas newly synthesized histones are enriched in the differentiating daughter cell. We also found that randomized inheritance of preexisting histones versus newly synthesized histones results in both stem cell loss and progenitor germ cell tumor phenotypes, suggesting that programmed histone inheritance is a key epigenetic player for cells to either remember or reset cell fates. Here, we will discuss these findings in the context of current knowledge on DNA replication, polarized mitotic machinery, and ACD for both animal development and tissue homeostasis. We will also speculate on some potential mechanisms underlying asymmetric histone inheritance, which may be used in other biological events to achieve the asymmetric cell fates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"305-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

DNA复制和有丝分裂的过程允许细胞的遗传信息被复制并可靠地转移到它的子细胞。然而,如果DNA复制和细胞分裂总是以对称的方式进行,结果将是一群肿瘤细胞,而不是多细胞生物。因此,要全面了解任何复杂的生物体,就必须了解细胞如何在忠实地保持相同遗传物质的情况下变得不同。众所周知,每种细胞类型所包含的不同表观遗传信息决定了其独特的基因表达程序。然而,包含在亲本细胞中的表观遗传信息是如何在子细胞中保持或改变的,这在很大程度上仍然是未知的。在果蝇雄性生殖系干细胞的不对称细胞分裂(ACD)过程中,我们之前的研究发现,先前存在的组蛋白在再生的干细胞子细胞中被选择性保留,而新合成的组蛋白在分化的子细胞中被富集。我们还发现,预先存在的组蛋白与新合成的组蛋白的随机遗传会导致干细胞损失和祖生殖细胞肿瘤表型,这表明程序化组蛋白遗传是细胞记忆或重置细胞命运的关键表观遗传参与者。在这里,我们将在DNA复制、极化有丝分裂机制和动物发育和组织稳态的ACD的现有知识的背景下讨论这些发现。我们还将推测组蛋白不对称遗传的一些潜在机制,这些机制可能在其他生物事件中用于实现细胞命运的不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Symmetry from Asymmetry or Asymmetry from Symmetry?

The processes of DNA replication and mitosis allow the genetic information of a cell to be copied and transferred reliably to its daughter cells. However, if DNA replication and cell division were always performed in a symmetric manner, the result would be a cluster of tumor cells instead of a multicellular organism. Therefore, gaining a complete understanding of any complex living organism depends on learning how cells become different while faithfully maintaining the same genetic material. It is well recognized that the distinct epigenetic information contained in each cell type defines its unique gene expression program. Nevertheless, how epigenetic information contained in the parental cell is either maintained or changed in the daughter cells remains largely unknown. During the asymmetric cell division (ACD) of Drosophila male germline stem cells, our previous work revealed that preexisting histones are selectively retained in the renewed stem cell daughter, whereas newly synthesized histones are enriched in the differentiating daughter cell. We also found that randomized inheritance of preexisting histones versus newly synthesized histones results in both stem cell loss and progenitor germ cell tumor phenotypes, suggesting that programmed histone inheritance is a key epigenetic player for cells to either remember or reset cell fates. Here, we will discuss these findings in the context of current knowledge on DNA replication, polarized mitotic machinery, and ACD for both animal development and tissue homeostasis. We will also speculate on some potential mechanisms underlying asymmetric histone inheritance, which may be used in other biological events to achieve the asymmetric cell fates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Attenuation of Eukaryotic Protein-Coding Gene Expression via Premature Transcription Termination. Corrigendum: Adolescence and "Late Blooming" Synapses of the Prefrontal Cortex. A Conversation with Alberto Kornblihtt. A Conversation with David Bartel. A Conversation with Ling-Ling Chen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1