神经科学稳健统计方法指南

Q2 Neuroscience Current Protocols in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2018-01-22 DOI:10.1002/cpns.41
Rand R. Wilcox, Guillaume A. Rousselet
{"title":"神经科学稳健统计方法指南","authors":"Rand R. Wilcox,&nbsp;Guillaume A. Rousselet","doi":"10.1002/cpns.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a vast array of new and improved methods for comparing groups and studying associations that offer the potential for substantially increasing power, providing improved control over the probability of a Type I error, and yielding a deeper and more nuanced understanding of data. These new techniques effectively deal with four insights into when and why conventional methods can be unsatisfactory. But for the non-statistician, the vast array of new and improved techniques for comparing groups and studying associations can seem daunting, simply because there are so many new methods that are now available. This unit briefly reviews when and why conventional methods can have relatively low power and yield misleading results. The main goal is to suggest some general guidelines regarding when, how, and why certain modern techniques might be used. © 2018 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":40016,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpns.41","citationCount":"85","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience\",\"authors\":\"Rand R. Wilcox,&nbsp;Guillaume A. Rousselet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpns.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a vast array of new and improved methods for comparing groups and studying associations that offer the potential for substantially increasing power, providing improved control over the probability of a Type I error, and yielding a deeper and more nuanced understanding of data. These new techniques effectively deal with four insights into when and why conventional methods can be unsatisfactory. But for the non-statistician, the vast array of new and improved techniques for comparing groups and studying associations can seem daunting, simply because there are so many new methods that are now available. This unit briefly reviews when and why conventional methods can have relatively low power and yield misleading results. The main goal is to suggest some general guidelines regarding when, how, and why certain modern techniques might be used. © 2018 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Protocols in Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpns.41\",\"citationCount\":\"85\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Protocols in Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpns.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpns.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

摘要

有大量新的和改进的方法用于比较群体和研究关联,这些方法有可能大幅提高能力,改善对第一类错误概率的控制,并对数据产生更深入、更细致的理解。这些新技术有效地解决了四个问题,即传统方法何时以及为什么不能令人满意。但对于非统计学家来说,用于比较群体和研究关联的大量新的和改进的技术似乎令人生畏,原因很简单,因为现在有太多的新方法可用。本单元简要回顾了传统方法何时以及为什么具有相对较低的功率并产生误导性结果。主要目标是提出一些关于何时、如何以及为什么可以使用某些现代技术的一般指导方针。©2018 by John Wiley &儿子,Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience

There is a vast array of new and improved methods for comparing groups and studying associations that offer the potential for substantially increasing power, providing improved control over the probability of a Type I error, and yielding a deeper and more nuanced understanding of data. These new techniques effectively deal with four insights into when and why conventional methods can be unsatisfactory. But for the non-statistician, the vast array of new and improved techniques for comparing groups and studying associations can seem daunting, simply because there are so many new methods that are now available. This unit briefly reviews when and why conventional methods can have relatively low power and yield misleading results. The main goal is to suggest some general guidelines regarding when, how, and why certain modern techniques might be used. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Protocols in Neuroscience
Current Protocols in Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Current Protocols in Neuroscience is a one-stop resource for finding and adapting the best models and methods for all types of neuroscience experiments. Updated every three months in all formats, CPNS is constantly evolving to keep pace with the very latest discoveries and developments. A year of these quarterly updates is included in the initial CPNS purchase price.
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous Ca2+ Imaging and Optogenetic Stimulation of Cortical Astrocytes in Adult Murine Brain Slices Automated Two-Chamber Operon ID/ED Task for Mice Automated Quantification of Mitochondrial Fragmentation in an In Vitro Parkinson's Disease Model. Whole-Brain Image Analysis and Anatomical Atlas 3D Generation Using MagellanMapper. A Guide to Fluorescence Lifetime Microscopy and Förster's Resonance Energy Transfer in Neuroscience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1