非瓣膜性房颤卒中的预后、复发和死亡率:长期随访研究。

Antonio Arauz, Francisco Ruiz-Navarro, Miguel A Barboza, Angelica Ruiz, Jonathan Colin, Marisela Reyes, Humberto Silos, Carlos Cantu-Brito, Luis Murillo-Bonilla, Fernando Barinagarrementeria
{"title":"非瓣膜性房颤卒中的预后、复发和死亡率:长期随访研究。","authors":"Antonio Arauz,&nbsp;Francisco Ruiz-Navarro,&nbsp;Miguel A Barboza,&nbsp;Angelica Ruiz,&nbsp;Jonathan Colin,&nbsp;Marisela Reyes,&nbsp;Humberto Silos,&nbsp;Carlos Cantu-Brito,&nbsp;Luis Murillo-Bonilla,&nbsp;Fernando Barinagarrementeria","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) and a powerful predictor of mortality. This study investigates early and long-term outcome among patients with IS secondary to NVAF and identify the main factors associated with poor outcome, recurrence, and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data from our consecutive NVAF acute IS database, over a period of 23 years. The endpoints were bad outcome (Modified Rankin Score ≥3), recurrence, and mortality at discharge, after 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up. Multivariate Cox and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to estimate the probability of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>129 consecutive acute IS patients were included (77 [59.7%] females, mean age 70.2 ± 10.1 years). Discharge, 6 and 12 months bad outcome was 62%, 63%, and 61%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 6-54.5), 35.6% patients had bad outcome, 21.7% had recurrence and 36.4% died. The recurrence and death annual rates were 19.1% and 6.32%. The absence of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and NIHSS score > 12 were the strongest predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IS secondary to NVAF has a high rate of stroke recurrence and mortality in our population, with the absence of OAC and major stroke as the main risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 6","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805901/pdf/jvin-9-6-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome, Recurrence and Mortality after Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Stroke: Long-Term Follow-Up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Arauz,&nbsp;Francisco Ruiz-Navarro,&nbsp;Miguel A Barboza,&nbsp;Angelica Ruiz,&nbsp;Jonathan Colin,&nbsp;Marisela Reyes,&nbsp;Humberto Silos,&nbsp;Carlos Cantu-Brito,&nbsp;Luis Murillo-Bonilla,&nbsp;Fernando Barinagarrementeria\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) and a powerful predictor of mortality. This study investigates early and long-term outcome among patients with IS secondary to NVAF and identify the main factors associated with poor outcome, recurrence, and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data from our consecutive NVAF acute IS database, over a period of 23 years. The endpoints were bad outcome (Modified Rankin Score ≥3), recurrence, and mortality at discharge, after 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up. Multivariate Cox and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to estimate the probability of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>129 consecutive acute IS patients were included (77 [59.7%] females, mean age 70.2 ± 10.1 years). Discharge, 6 and 12 months bad outcome was 62%, 63%, and 61%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 6-54.5), 35.6% patients had bad outcome, 21.7% had recurrence and 36.4% died. The recurrence and death annual rates were 19.1% and 6.32%. The absence of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and NIHSS score > 12 were the strongest predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IS secondary to NVAF has a high rate of stroke recurrence and mortality in our population, with the absence of OAC and major stroke as the main risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"5-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805901/pdf/jvin-9-6-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)是缺血性卒中(is)的主要危险因素,也是死亡率的重要预测因子。本研究调查了继发于非瓣膜性房颤的IS患者的早期和长期预后,并确定了与预后不良、复发和死亡相关的主要因素。方法:我们分析了来自连续23年的非瓣膜性房颤急性IS数据库的数据。终点为不良预后(改良Rankin评分≥3)、复发率、出院时、6个月后、12个月后和最后随访时的死亡率。采用多变量Cox和Kaplan-Meier分析估计死亡概率。结果:纳入129例连续急性IS患者(女性77例[59.7%],平均年龄70.2±10.1岁)。出院、6个月和12个月不良预后分别为62%、63%和61%。中位随访17个月(IQR 6-54.5), 35.6%患者预后不良,21.7%患者复发,36.4%患者死亡。复发率19.1%,年死亡率6.32%。无口服抗凝剂(OAC)和NIHSS评分> 12是死亡率的最强预测因子。结论:我国人群中继发于非瓣膜性房颤的IS卒中复发率和死亡率较高,OAC缺失和重度卒中是主要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome, Recurrence and Mortality after Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Stroke: Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Objective: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) and a powerful predictor of mortality. This study investigates early and long-term outcome among patients with IS secondary to NVAF and identify the main factors associated with poor outcome, recurrence, and death.

Methods: We analyzed the data from our consecutive NVAF acute IS database, over a period of 23 years. The endpoints were bad outcome (Modified Rankin Score ≥3), recurrence, and mortality at discharge, after 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up. Multivariate Cox and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to estimate the probability of death.

Results: 129 consecutive acute IS patients were included (77 [59.7%] females, mean age 70.2 ± 10.1 years). Discharge, 6 and 12 months bad outcome was 62%, 63%, and 61%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 6-54.5), 35.6% patients had bad outcome, 21.7% had recurrence and 36.4% died. The recurrence and death annual rates were 19.1% and 6.32%. The absence of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and NIHSS score > 12 were the strongest predictors of mortality.

Conclusions: IS secondary to NVAF has a high rate of stroke recurrence and mortality in our population, with the absence of OAC and major stroke as the main risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superior cervical ganglion stimulation results in potent cerebral vasoconstriction in swine. Institution of Code Neurointervention and Its Impact on Reaction and Treatment Times. Safety and Clinical Outcomes after Transverse Venous Sinus Stenting for Treatment of Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Single Center Experience. Comparative Analysis of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Outcomes and Complications with the Classic versus Flex Pipeline Embolization Devices and Phenom versus Marksman Microcatheter Delivery System: The Role of Microcatheter Choice on Complication Rate. Prediction of Symptomatic Vasospasm in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Early Transcranial Doppler.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1