骨髓间充质干细胞作为核供体可提高克隆马的生存能力和健康。

IF 1.7 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2018-02-14 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/SCCAA.S151763
R Olivera, L N Moro, R Jordan, N Pallarols, A Guglielminetti, C Luzzani, S G Miriuka, G Vichera
{"title":"骨髓间充质干细胞作为核供体可提高克隆马的生存能力和健康。","authors":"R Olivera,&nbsp;L N Moro,&nbsp;R Jordan,&nbsp;N Pallarols,&nbsp;A Guglielminetti,&nbsp;C Luzzani,&nbsp;S G Miriuka,&nbsp;G Vichera","doi":"10.2147/SCCAA.S151763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cell plasticity is crucial in cloning to allow an efficient nuclear reprogramming and healthy offspring. Hence, cells with high plasticity, such as multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), may be a promising alternative for horse cloning. In this study, we evaluated the use of bone marrow-MSCs (BM-MSCs) as nuclear donors in horse cloning, and we compared the in vitro and in vivo embryo development with respect to fibroblasts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Zona-free nuclear transfer was performed using BM-MSCs (MSC group, n=3432) or adult fibroblasts (AF group, n=4527). Embryos produced by artificial insemination (AI) recovered by uterine flushing and transferred to recipient mares were used as controls (AI group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blastocyst development was higher in the MSC group than in the AF group (18.1% vs 10.9%, respectively; <i>p</i><0.05). However, pregnancy rates and delivery rates were similar in both cloning groups, although they were lower than in the AI group (pregnancy rates: 17.7% [41/232] for MSC, 12.5% [37/297] for AF and 80.7% [71/88] for AI; delivery rates: 56.8% [21/37], 41.5% [17/41] and 90.1% [64/71], respectively). Remarkably, the gestation length of the AF group was significantly longer than the control (361.7±10.9 vs 333.9±8.7 days), in contrast to the MSC group (340.6±8.89 days). Of the total deliveries, 95.2% (20/21) of the MSC-foals were viable, compared to 52.9% (9/17) of the AF-foals (<i>p</i><0.05). In addition, the AF-foals had more physiological abnormalities at birth than the MSC-foals; 90.5% (19/21) of the MSC-delivered foals were completely normal and healthy, compared to 35.3% (6/17) in the AF group. The abnormalities included flexural or angular limb deformities, umbilical cord enlargement, placental alterations and signs of syndrome of neonatal maladjustment, which were treated in most cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we obtained 29 viable cloned foals and found that MSCs are suitable donor cells in horse cloning. Even more, these cells could be more efficiently reprogrammed compared to fibroblasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":44934,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","volume":"11 ","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SCCAA.S151763","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as nuclear donors improve viability and health of cloned horses.\",\"authors\":\"R Olivera,&nbsp;L N Moro,&nbsp;R Jordan,&nbsp;N Pallarols,&nbsp;A Guglielminetti,&nbsp;C Luzzani,&nbsp;S G Miriuka,&nbsp;G Vichera\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/SCCAA.S151763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cell plasticity is crucial in cloning to allow an efficient nuclear reprogramming and healthy offspring. Hence, cells with high plasticity, such as multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), may be a promising alternative for horse cloning. In this study, we evaluated the use of bone marrow-MSCs (BM-MSCs) as nuclear donors in horse cloning, and we compared the in vitro and in vivo embryo development with respect to fibroblasts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Zona-free nuclear transfer was performed using BM-MSCs (MSC group, n=3432) or adult fibroblasts (AF group, n=4527). Embryos produced by artificial insemination (AI) recovered by uterine flushing and transferred to recipient mares were used as controls (AI group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blastocyst development was higher in the MSC group than in the AF group (18.1% vs 10.9%, respectively; <i>p</i><0.05). However, pregnancy rates and delivery rates were similar in both cloning groups, although they were lower than in the AI group (pregnancy rates: 17.7% [41/232] for MSC, 12.5% [37/297] for AF and 80.7% [71/88] for AI; delivery rates: 56.8% [21/37], 41.5% [17/41] and 90.1% [64/71], respectively). Remarkably, the gestation length of the AF group was significantly longer than the control (361.7±10.9 vs 333.9±8.7 days), in contrast to the MSC group (340.6±8.89 days). Of the total deliveries, 95.2% (20/21) of the MSC-foals were viable, compared to 52.9% (9/17) of the AF-foals (<i>p</i><0.05). In addition, the AF-foals had more physiological abnormalities at birth than the MSC-foals; 90.5% (19/21) of the MSC-delivered foals were completely normal and healthy, compared to 35.3% (6/17) in the AF group. The abnormalities included flexural or angular limb deformities, umbilical cord enlargement, placental alterations and signs of syndrome of neonatal maladjustment, which were treated in most cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we obtained 29 viable cloned foals and found that MSCs are suitable donor cells in horse cloning. Even more, these cells could be more efficiently reprogrammed compared to fibroblasts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"13-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SCCAA.S151763\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S151763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cells and Cloning-Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S151763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

细胞可塑性在克隆中是至关重要的,以允许有效的核重编程和健康的后代。因此,具有高可塑性的细胞,如多能间充质干细胞(MSCs),可能是克隆马的一个有希望的选择。在这项研究中,我们评估了骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)作为核供体在马克隆中的应用,并比较了成纤维细胞在体外和体内的胚胎发育情况。材料和方法:采用骨髓间充质干细胞(MSC组,n=3432)或成体成纤维细胞(AF组,n=4527)进行无区核移植。将经子宫冲洗回收的人工授精产生的胚胎移植给受体母马作为对照组(人工授精组)。结果:MSC组囊胚发育高于AF组(分别为18.1%和10.9%;结论:我们获得了29匹活的克隆马驹,发现MSCs是克隆马的合适供体细胞。更重要的是,与成纤维细胞相比,这些细胞可以更有效地重新编程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as nuclear donors improve viability and health of cloned horses.

Introduction: Cell plasticity is crucial in cloning to allow an efficient nuclear reprogramming and healthy offspring. Hence, cells with high plasticity, such as multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), may be a promising alternative for horse cloning. In this study, we evaluated the use of bone marrow-MSCs (BM-MSCs) as nuclear donors in horse cloning, and we compared the in vitro and in vivo embryo development with respect to fibroblasts.

Materials and methods: Zona-free nuclear transfer was performed using BM-MSCs (MSC group, n=3432) or adult fibroblasts (AF group, n=4527). Embryos produced by artificial insemination (AI) recovered by uterine flushing and transferred to recipient mares were used as controls (AI group).

Results: Blastocyst development was higher in the MSC group than in the AF group (18.1% vs 10.9%, respectively; p<0.05). However, pregnancy rates and delivery rates were similar in both cloning groups, although they were lower than in the AI group (pregnancy rates: 17.7% [41/232] for MSC, 12.5% [37/297] for AF and 80.7% [71/88] for AI; delivery rates: 56.8% [21/37], 41.5% [17/41] and 90.1% [64/71], respectively). Remarkably, the gestation length of the AF group was significantly longer than the control (361.7±10.9 vs 333.9±8.7 days), in contrast to the MSC group (340.6±8.89 days). Of the total deliveries, 95.2% (20/21) of the MSC-foals were viable, compared to 52.9% (9/17) of the AF-foals (p<0.05). In addition, the AF-foals had more physiological abnormalities at birth than the MSC-foals; 90.5% (19/21) of the MSC-delivered foals were completely normal and healthy, compared to 35.3% (6/17) in the AF group. The abnormalities included flexural or angular limb deformities, umbilical cord enlargement, placental alterations and signs of syndrome of neonatal maladjustment, which were treated in most cases.

Conclusion: In summary, we obtained 29 viable cloned foals and found that MSCs are suitable donor cells in horse cloning. Even more, these cells could be more efficiently reprogrammed compared to fibroblasts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Reversal of Unobstructed Azoospermia in Rats. Assessment of the Dose-Dependent Effect of Human Platelet Lysate on Wharton's Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Culture for Manufacturing Protocols. A Comprehensive Review of Stem Cell Conditioned Media Role for Anti-Aging on Skin. Intraperitoneal Injection of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticle Accelerates Stem Cell Therapy Effects on Acute Kidney Injury [Retraction]. A Thinkful of "Alginate Beads as a Promising Tool for Successful Production of Viable and Pluripotent Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in a 3D Culture System" [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1