慢性阻塞性肺病捆绑支付计划中DRG分类的意义。

American journal of accountable care Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-08
Trisha M Parekh, Surya P Bhatt, Andrew O Westfall, James M Wells, Denay Kirkpatrick, Anand S Iyer, Michael Mugavero, James H Willig, Mark T Dransfield
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病捆绑支付计划中DRG分类的意义。","authors":"Trisha M Parekh,&nbsp;Surya P Bhatt,&nbsp;Andrew O Westfall,&nbsp;James M Wells,&nbsp;Denay Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Anand S Iyer,&nbsp;Michael Mugavero,&nbsp;James H Willig,&nbsp;Mark T Dransfield","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Institutions participating in the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative invest significantly in efforts to reduce readmissions and costs for patients who are included in the program. Eligibility for the BPCI initiative is determined by diagnosis-related group (DRG) classification. The implications of this methodology for chronic diseases are not known. We hypothesized that patients included in a BPCI initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) would have less severe illness and decreased hospital utilization compared with those excluded from the bundled payment initiative.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sought to determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital with acute exacerbations of COPD between 2012 and 2014 who were included and excluded in a BPCI initiative. Patients were included in the analysis if they were discharged with a COPD DRG or with a non-COPD DRG but with an <i>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision</i> code for COPD exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and ninety-eight unique patients were discharged for an acute exacerbation of COPD; 239 (34.2%) were not classified into a COPD DRG and thus were excluded from the BPCI initiative. These patients were more likely to have intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (63.2% vs 4.4%, respectively; <i>P</i> <.001) and require noninvasive (46.9% vs 6.5%; <i>P</i> <.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (41.4% vs 0.7%; <i>P</i> <.001) during their hospitalization than those in the initiative. They also had a longer ICU length of stay (5.2 vs 1.8 days; <i>P</i> = .011), longer hospital length of stay (10.3 days vs 3.9 days; <i>P</i> <.001), higher in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs 0.7%; <i>P</i> <.001), and greater hospitalization costs (median = $13,677 [interquartile range = $7489-$23,054] vs $4281 [$2718-$6537]; <i>P</i> <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of DRGs to identify patients with COPD for inclusion in the BPCI initiative led to the exclusion of more than one-third of patients with acute exacerbations who had more severe illness and worse outcomes and who may benefit most from the additional interventions provided by the initiative.</p>","PeriodicalId":72160,"journal":{"name":"American journal of accountable care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881946/pdf/nihms944598.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of DRG Classification in a Bundled Payment Initiative for COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Trisha M Parekh,&nbsp;Surya P Bhatt,&nbsp;Andrew O Westfall,&nbsp;James M Wells,&nbsp;Denay Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Anand S Iyer,&nbsp;Michael Mugavero,&nbsp;James H Willig,&nbsp;Mark T Dransfield\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Institutions participating in the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative invest significantly in efforts to reduce readmissions and costs for patients who are included in the program. Eligibility for the BPCI initiative is determined by diagnosis-related group (DRG) classification. The implications of this methodology for chronic diseases are not known. We hypothesized that patients included in a BPCI initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) would have less severe illness and decreased hospital utilization compared with those excluded from the bundled payment initiative.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sought to determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital with acute exacerbations of COPD between 2012 and 2014 who were included and excluded in a BPCI initiative. Patients were included in the analysis if they were discharged with a COPD DRG or with a non-COPD DRG but with an <i>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision</i> code for COPD exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and ninety-eight unique patients were discharged for an acute exacerbation of COPD; 239 (34.2%) were not classified into a COPD DRG and thus were excluded from the BPCI initiative. These patients were more likely to have intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (63.2% vs 4.4%, respectively; <i>P</i> <.001) and require noninvasive (46.9% vs 6.5%; <i>P</i> <.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (41.4% vs 0.7%; <i>P</i> <.001) during their hospitalization than those in the initiative. They also had a longer ICU length of stay (5.2 vs 1.8 days; <i>P</i> = .011), longer hospital length of stay (10.3 days vs 3.9 days; <i>P</i> <.001), higher in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs 0.7%; <i>P</i> <.001), and greater hospitalization costs (median = $13,677 [interquartile range = $7489-$23,054] vs $4281 [$2718-$6537]; <i>P</i> <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of DRGs to identify patients with COPD for inclusion in the BPCI initiative led to the exclusion of more than one-third of patients with acute exacerbations who had more severe illness and worse outcomes and who may benefit most from the additional interventions provided by the initiative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of accountable care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881946/pdf/nihms944598.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of accountable care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of accountable care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:参与医疗保险改善护理捆绑支付(BPCI)计划的机构大力投资,努力减少纳入该计划的患者的再入院率和费用。BPCI计划的资格由诊断相关组(DRG)分类决定。这种方法对慢性疾病的影响尚不清楚。我们假设纳入慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD) BPCI计划的患者与未纳入捆绑支付计划的患者相比,病情较轻,住院率较低。研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。方法:我们试图确定2012年至2014年间在阿拉巴马大学伯明翰医院住院的慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者的临床特征和结局,这些患者被纳入和排除在BPCI计划中。如果患者出院时患有COPD DRG或患有非COPD DRG,但患有国际疾病分类,第九次修订的COPD加重代码,则将其纳入分析。结果:698例慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者出院;239例(34.2%)未归类为COPD DRG,因此被排除在BPCI计划之外。这些患者更有可能进入重症监护病房(ICU)(分别为63.2%和4.4%);P P P = .011),住院时间较长(10.3天vs . 3.9天;结论:使用DRGs识别COPD患者以纳入BPCI计划导致超过三分之一的急性加重患者被排除在外,这些患者病情更严重,预后更差,并且可能从该计划提供的额外干预中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications of DRG Classification in a Bundled Payment Initiative for COPD.

Objectives: Institutions participating in the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative invest significantly in efforts to reduce readmissions and costs for patients who are included in the program. Eligibility for the BPCI initiative is determined by diagnosis-related group (DRG) classification. The implications of this methodology for chronic diseases are not known. We hypothesized that patients included in a BPCI initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) would have less severe illness and decreased hospital utilization compared with those excluded from the bundled payment initiative.

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: We sought to determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital with acute exacerbations of COPD between 2012 and 2014 who were included and excluded in a BPCI initiative. Patients were included in the analysis if they were discharged with a COPD DRG or with a non-COPD DRG but with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for COPD exacerbation.

Results: Six hundred and ninety-eight unique patients were discharged for an acute exacerbation of COPD; 239 (34.2%) were not classified into a COPD DRG and thus were excluded from the BPCI initiative. These patients were more likely to have intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (63.2% vs 4.4%, respectively; P <.001) and require noninvasive (46.9% vs 6.5%; P <.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (41.4% vs 0.7%; P <.001) during their hospitalization than those in the initiative. They also had a longer ICU length of stay (5.2 vs 1.8 days; P = .011), longer hospital length of stay (10.3 days vs 3.9 days; P <.001), higher in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs 0.7%; P <.001), and greater hospitalization costs (median = $13,677 [interquartile range = $7489-$23,054] vs $4281 [$2718-$6537]; P <.001).

Conclusions: The use of DRGs to identify patients with COPD for inclusion in the BPCI initiative led to the exclusion of more than one-third of patients with acute exacerbations who had more severe illness and worse outcomes and who may benefit most from the additional interventions provided by the initiative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Care Case Conferences to Mitigate Social Determinants of Health: A Case Study from One FQHC System. Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery. Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery. Implementation Variation in Natural Experiments of State Health Policy Initiatives. Increased Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Chronic Opioid Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1