编码指令和反应偏差对特定认知跨文化差异的影响。

Culture and Brain Pub Date : 2017-10-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x
Laura E Paige, Selen Amado, Angela H Gutchess
{"title":"编码指令和反应偏差对特定认知跨文化差异的影响。","authors":"Laura E Paige,&nbsp;Selen Amado,&nbsp;Angela H Gutchess","doi":"10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior cross-cultural research has reported cultural variations in memory. One study revealed that Americans remembered images with more perceptual detail than East Asians (Millar et al. in Cult Brain 1(2-4):138-157, 2013). However, in a later study, this expected pattern was not replicated, possibly due to differences in encoding instructions (Paige et al. in Cortex 91:250-261, 2017). The present study sought to examine when cultural variation in memory-related decisions occur and the role of instructions. American and East Asian participants viewed images of objects while making a <i>Purchase</i> decision or an <i>Approach</i> decision and later completed a surprise recognition test. Results revealed Americans had higher hit rates for specific memory, regardless of instruction type, and a less stringent response criterion relative to East Asians. Additionally, a pattern emerged where the <i>Approach</i> decision enhanced hit rates for specific memory relative to the <i>Purchase</i> decision only when administered first; this pattern did not differ across cultures. Results suggest encoding instructions do not magnify cross-cultural differences in memory. Ultimately, cross-cultural differences in response bias, rather than memory sensitivity per se, may account for findings of cultural differences in memory specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10837,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Brain","volume":"5 2","pages":"153-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of encoding instructions and response bias on cross-cultural differences in specific recognition.\",\"authors\":\"Laura E Paige,&nbsp;Selen Amado,&nbsp;Angela H Gutchess\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior cross-cultural research has reported cultural variations in memory. One study revealed that Americans remembered images with more perceptual detail than East Asians (Millar et al. in Cult Brain 1(2-4):138-157, 2013). However, in a later study, this expected pattern was not replicated, possibly due to differences in encoding instructions (Paige et al. in Cortex 91:250-261, 2017). The present study sought to examine when cultural variation in memory-related decisions occur and the role of instructions. American and East Asian participants viewed images of objects while making a <i>Purchase</i> decision or an <i>Approach</i> decision and later completed a surprise recognition test. Results revealed Americans had higher hit rates for specific memory, regardless of instruction type, and a less stringent response criterion relative to East Asians. Additionally, a pattern emerged where the <i>Approach</i> decision enhanced hit rates for specific memory relative to the <i>Purchase</i> decision only when administered first; this pattern did not differ across cultures. Results suggest encoding instructions do not magnify cross-cultural differences in memory. Ultimately, cross-cultural differences in response bias, rather than memory sensitivity per se, may account for findings of cultural differences in memory specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Brain\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"153-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Brain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-017-0055-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

先前的跨文化研究报告了记忆的文化差异。一项研究显示,美国人比东亚人更能记住图像的感知细节(Millar et al. in Cult Brain 1(2-4):138-157, 2013)。然而,在后来的研究中,这种预期模式没有被复制,可能是由于编码指令的差异(Paige et al. in Cortex 91:250-261, 2017)。本研究试图检验文化差异在记忆相关决策中何时发生以及指令的作用。美国和东亚的参与者在做出购买决定或接近决定时观看了物体的图像,随后完成了一个惊喜识别测试。结果显示,与东亚人相比,美国人在特定记忆方面的命中率更高,与指令类型无关,而且反应标准也不那么严格。此外,出现了一种模式,即只有在首先执行时,方法决策才会相对于购买决策提高特定内存的命中率;这种模式在不同的文化中没有差异。结果表明,编码指令不会放大记忆的跨文化差异。最终,反应偏差的跨文化差异,而不是记忆敏感性本身,可能解释了记忆特异性的文化差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of encoding instructions and response bias on cross-cultural differences in specific recognition.

Prior cross-cultural research has reported cultural variations in memory. One study revealed that Americans remembered images with more perceptual detail than East Asians (Millar et al. in Cult Brain 1(2-4):138-157, 2013). However, in a later study, this expected pattern was not replicated, possibly due to differences in encoding instructions (Paige et al. in Cortex 91:250-261, 2017). The present study sought to examine when cultural variation in memory-related decisions occur and the role of instructions. American and East Asian participants viewed images of objects while making a Purchase decision or an Approach decision and later completed a surprise recognition test. Results revealed Americans had higher hit rates for specific memory, regardless of instruction type, and a less stringent response criterion relative to East Asians. Additionally, a pattern emerged where the Approach decision enhanced hit rates for specific memory relative to the Purchase decision only when administered first; this pattern did not differ across cultures. Results suggest encoding instructions do not magnify cross-cultural differences in memory. Ultimately, cross-cultural differences in response bias, rather than memory sensitivity per se, may account for findings of cultural differences in memory specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Culture and trait inferences from facial cues Investigating individual differences in left-right confusion among healthy Japanese young adults The multicultural neuropsychological scale (MUNS): validity, reliability, normative data and cross-cultural evidence Self-assertive interdependence in Mongolian culture: evidence from cognitive anthropology Impact of social economic development on positive and negative affect among Chinese college students: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 2001–2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1