与传统硅印模相比,口腔内扫描仪(IOS)对后间隙深度阅读的体外评估。

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-01-21 eCollection Date: 2017-10-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360
A Pinto, L Arcuri, P Carosi, R Nardi, A Libonati, L Ottria, V Campanella
{"title":"与传统硅印模相比,口腔内扫描仪(IOS)对后间隙深度阅读的体外评估。","authors":"A Pinto,&nbsp;L Arcuri,&nbsp;P Carosi,&nbsp;R Nardi,&nbsp;A Libonati,&nbsp;L Ottria,&nbsp;V Campanella","doi":"10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the depth and quality of the post-space reading, using an IOS without scan-post, compared to a traditional silicon technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six extracted bicuspids were decoronated and endodontically treated. After having prepared the space for the posts, a structure in pink acrylic resin was created with two resin elements. At the center of the structure one sample was put at a time. Digital and traditional impressions were taken for each sample.Digital impressions were developed through the Computer-aided design (CAD) software in order to integrate the scanner results into a three-dimensional grid to make the measurements. A K-file was used to measure the length of the post-space of each sample obtained through the traditional silicon impression and subsequently the measurement results were reported on a millimeter gauge. Furthermore, an assessment of the width of the entrances of the post-spaces was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading depth discrepancy expressed in percentages (19.58%) indicates that the digital impression with current technologies fails to impress clearly the post-space. Standard deviation of the data expressed in percentage is 13.89, suggesting that the values were not similar to each other. In two cases the digital technique has achieved less than 10% difference compared to the traditional technique, but there have been also cases in which the variation in depth has reached almost 40%.The samples that showed the minor discrepancy between the two techniques expressed the widest post-space entrance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, the application of the IOS for the post-space reading in order to deliver an anatomic post has been proven to be still not reliable, as there are still depth reading limitations for the narrow root channels. In fact, in this type of channels it is difficult to reach with the light beam of the IOS the deepest areas of the post-space, with a consequent incomplete post-space reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"10 4","pages":"360-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892666/pdf/360-368.pdf","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression.\",\"authors\":\"A Pinto,&nbsp;L Arcuri,&nbsp;P Carosi,&nbsp;R Nardi,&nbsp;A Libonati,&nbsp;L Ottria,&nbsp;V Campanella\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the depth and quality of the post-space reading, using an IOS without scan-post, compared to a traditional silicon technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six extracted bicuspids were decoronated and endodontically treated. After having prepared the space for the posts, a structure in pink acrylic resin was created with two resin elements. At the center of the structure one sample was put at a time. Digital and traditional impressions were taken for each sample.Digital impressions were developed through the Computer-aided design (CAD) software in order to integrate the scanner results into a three-dimensional grid to make the measurements. A K-file was used to measure the length of the post-space of each sample obtained through the traditional silicon impression and subsequently the measurement results were reported on a millimeter gauge. Furthermore, an assessment of the width of the entrances of the post-spaces was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reading depth discrepancy expressed in percentages (19.58%) indicates that the digital impression with current technologies fails to impress clearly the post-space. Standard deviation of the data expressed in percentage is 13.89, suggesting that the values were not similar to each other. In two cases the digital technique has achieved less than 10% difference compared to the traditional technique, but there have been also cases in which the variation in depth has reached almost 40%.The samples that showed the minor discrepancy between the two techniques expressed the widest post-space entrance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, the application of the IOS for the post-space reading in order to deliver an anatomic post has been proven to be still not reliable, as there are still depth reading limitations for the narrow root channels. In fact, in this type of channels it is difficult to reach with the light beam of the IOS the deepest areas of the post-space, with a consequent incomplete post-space reading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"360-368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5892666/pdf/360-368.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估后空间阅读的深度和质量,与传统的硅技术相比,使用无扫描桩的IOS。方法:对拔出的6颗二尖牙进行根管治疗。在为柱子准备好空间之后,用两个树脂元素创建了一个粉红色丙烯酸树脂结构。在结构的中心,一次放一个样品。对每个样品进行了数字和传统的印象。通过计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件开发数字印象,以便将扫描仪结果集成到三维网格中进行测量。用k形锉测量通过传统硅压痕获得的每个样品的后空间长度,随后将测量结果报告在毫米计上。此外,对后空间入口的宽度进行了评估。结果:以百分比表示的平均阅读深度差异(19.58%)表明,当前技术的数字印象无法清晰地印象后空间。数据以百分比表示的标准差为13.89,说明数值不相似。在两种情况下,与传统技术相比,数字技术的差异不到10%,但也有深度变化达到近40%的情况。样品显示了两种技术之间的微小差异,表达了最宽的后空间入口。结论:在本离体研究中,由于狭窄的根管仍然存在深度阅读的限制,应用IOS进行后空间阅读以递送解剖桩的方法仍然不可靠。事实上,在这种类型的通道中,IOS的光束很难到达后空间的最深处,从而导致后空间阅读不完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the depth and quality of the post-space reading, using an IOS without scan-post, compared to a traditional silicon technique.

Methods: Six extracted bicuspids were decoronated and endodontically treated. After having prepared the space for the posts, a structure in pink acrylic resin was created with two resin elements. At the center of the structure one sample was put at a time. Digital and traditional impressions were taken for each sample.Digital impressions were developed through the Computer-aided design (CAD) software in order to integrate the scanner results into a three-dimensional grid to make the measurements. A K-file was used to measure the length of the post-space of each sample obtained through the traditional silicon impression and subsequently the measurement results were reported on a millimeter gauge. Furthermore, an assessment of the width of the entrances of the post-spaces was carried out.

Results: The mean reading depth discrepancy expressed in percentages (19.58%) indicates that the digital impression with current technologies fails to impress clearly the post-space. Standard deviation of the data expressed in percentage is 13.89, suggesting that the values were not similar to each other. In two cases the digital technique has achieved less than 10% difference compared to the traditional technique, but there have been also cases in which the variation in depth has reached almost 40%.The samples that showed the minor discrepancy between the two techniques expressed the widest post-space entrance.

Conclusions: In this in vitro study, the application of the IOS for the post-space reading in order to deliver an anatomic post has been proven to be still not reliable, as there are still depth reading limitations for the narrow root channels. In fact, in this type of channels it is difficult to reach with the light beam of the IOS the deepest areas of the post-space, with a consequent incomplete post-space reading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of colonization of legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines. Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients. Correlations between dental malocclusions, ocular motility, and convergence disorders: a cross-sectional study in growing subjects. Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1