[微创主动脉瓣置换术后肺部并发症-倾向评分匹配分析]。

Przeglad lekarski Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Jarosław Stoliński, Dariusz Plicner, Michał Mędrzycki, Bogusław Kapelak
{"title":"[微创主动脉瓣置换术后肺部并发症-倾向评分匹配分析]。","authors":"Jarosław Stoliński,&nbsp;Dariusz Plicner,&nbsp;Michał Mędrzycki,&nbsp;Bogusław Kapelak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Instruction: </strong>To answer the question\nif minimally invasive aortic valve\nreplacement surgery through a right\nanterior minithoracotomy (RT-AVR)\nmay result in increased incidence of\npostoperative pulmonary complications\ncompared to conventional aortic\nvalve replacement through a median\nsternotomy (AVR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>It was retrospective\nanalysis of 212 patients\nscheduled for RT-AVR and 212 for\nAVR between January 2011 and December\n2014 selected with propensity\nscore matching. Respiratory system\ncomplications are analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative blood\ndrainage was 353±249 and 524±325\nml in RT-AVR and AVR groups respectively\n(p<0.001). Hospital stay was\n5.7±1.6 and 8.5±4.3 days (p<0.001),\nICU stay was 1.3±1.2 and 2.6±2.8 days\n(p<0.001) in RT-AVR and AVR patients\nrespectively. Respiratory system\ncomplications occurred in 13.7% of\nRT-AVR patients and 17.0% of AVR\npatients (p=0.364). Pneumonia was diagnosed\nin 2.4% and 0.5% of patients\n(p=0.129), pneumothorax in 2.0% and\n1.3% of patients (p=0.515), pleural effusion\nin 8.5% and 7.5% of patients\n(p =0.732) and thoracentesis was\nperformed in 7.1% and 7.5% of patients\nfrom RT-AVR and AVR groups\nrespectively. Mediastinitis was diagnosed\nin 0.0% of RT-AVR and 2.8% of\nAVR patients (p=0.020). Phrenic nerve\ndysfunction was present in 3.8% of\nRT-AVR and in 0.0% of AVR patients\n(p=0.006). COPD (OR=5.5; p<0.001)\nand increased postoperative blood\nloss (OR=3.5; p<0.001) were risk factors\nof postoperative pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive\nRT-AVR surgery did not result in increased\nrate of postoperative pulmonary\ncomplications compared to\nconventional AVR surgery through\na median sternotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pulmonary complications after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery - a propensity score matching analysis].\",\"authors\":\"Jarosław Stoliński,&nbsp;Dariusz Plicner,&nbsp;Michał Mędrzycki,&nbsp;Bogusław Kapelak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Instruction: </strong>To answer the question\\nif minimally invasive aortic valve\\nreplacement surgery through a right\\nanterior minithoracotomy (RT-AVR)\\nmay result in increased incidence of\\npostoperative pulmonary complications\\ncompared to conventional aortic\\nvalve replacement through a median\\nsternotomy (AVR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>It was retrospective\\nanalysis of 212 patients\\nscheduled for RT-AVR and 212 for\\nAVR between January 2011 and December\\n2014 selected with propensity\\nscore matching. Respiratory system\\ncomplications are analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative blood\\ndrainage was 353±249 and 524±325\\nml in RT-AVR and AVR groups respectively\\n(p<0.001). Hospital stay was\\n5.7±1.6 and 8.5±4.3 days (p<0.001),\\nICU stay was 1.3±1.2 and 2.6±2.8 days\\n(p<0.001) in RT-AVR and AVR patients\\nrespectively. Respiratory system\\ncomplications occurred in 13.7% of\\nRT-AVR patients and 17.0% of AVR\\npatients (p=0.364). Pneumonia was diagnosed\\nin 2.4% and 0.5% of patients\\n(p=0.129), pneumothorax in 2.0% and\\n1.3% of patients (p=0.515), pleural effusion\\nin 8.5% and 7.5% of patients\\n(p =0.732) and thoracentesis was\\nperformed in 7.1% and 7.5% of patients\\nfrom RT-AVR and AVR groups\\nrespectively. Mediastinitis was diagnosed\\nin 0.0% of RT-AVR and 2.8% of\\nAVR patients (p=0.020). Phrenic nerve\\ndysfunction was present in 3.8% of\\nRT-AVR and in 0.0% of AVR patients\\n(p=0.006). COPD (OR=5.5; p<0.001)\\nand increased postoperative blood\\nloss (OR=3.5; p<0.001) were risk factors\\nof postoperative pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive\\nRT-AVR surgery did not result in increased\\nrate of postoperative pulmonary\\ncomplications compared to\\nconventional AVR surgery through\\na median sternotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:为了回答这个问题:与传统的胸骨正中切口主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)相比,经右前小胸切开的微创主动脉瓣置换术(RT-AVR)是否会导致术后肺部并发症的发生率增加。材料和方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年12月期间计划接受RT-AVR治疗的212例患者和接受avr治疗的212例患者,采用倾向评分匹配法。分析呼吸系统并发症。结果:RT-AVR组和AVR组术后血流量分别为353±249 ml和524±325ml(结论:微创RT-AVR手术与常规胸骨正中切开AVR手术相比,术后肺部并发症发生率没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Pulmonary complications after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery - a propensity score matching analysis].

Instruction: To answer the question if minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery through a right anterior minithoracotomy (RT-AVR) may result in increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared to conventional aortic valve replacement through a median sternotomy (AVR).

Material and methods: It was retrospective analysis of 212 patients scheduled for RT-AVR and 212 for AVR between January 2011 and December 2014 selected with propensity score matching. Respiratory system complications are analysed.

Results: Postoperative blood drainage was 353±249 and 524±325 ml in RT-AVR and AVR groups respectively (p<0.001). Hospital stay was 5.7±1.6 and 8.5±4.3 days (p<0.001), ICU stay was 1.3±1.2 and 2.6±2.8 days (p<0.001) in RT-AVR and AVR patients respectively. Respiratory system complications occurred in 13.7% of RT-AVR patients and 17.0% of AVR patients (p=0.364). Pneumonia was diagnosed in 2.4% and 0.5% of patients (p=0.129), pneumothorax in 2.0% and 1.3% of patients (p=0.515), pleural effusion in 8.5% and 7.5% of patients (p =0.732) and thoracentesis was performed in 7.1% and 7.5% of patients from RT-AVR and AVR groups respectively. Mediastinitis was diagnosed in 0.0% of RT-AVR and 2.8% of AVR patients (p=0.020). Phrenic nerve dysfunction was present in 3.8% of RT-AVR and in 0.0% of AVR patients (p=0.006). COPD (OR=5.5; p<0.001) and increased postoperative blood loss (OR=3.5; p<0.001) were risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive RT-AVR surgery did not result in increased rate of postoperative pulmonary complications compared to conventional AVR surgery through a median sternotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Nitrite poisoning]. [Postpartum depression]. [Pseudomenstruation]. [Chest pain]. [Metformin and changes in blood pressure and heart rate in lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)--preliminary study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1