基于短信的吸烟干预使用信息自主权的有效性:试点研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2018-03-01 Epub Date: 2016-12-29 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2016.27
Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman
{"title":"基于短信的吸烟干预使用信息自主权的有效性:试点研究。","authors":"Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2016.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), <i>F</i>(1,59) = 4.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (<i>M</i> = 3.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.39) than control (<i>M</i> = 0.03, <i>SD</i> = 5.80; <i>t</i>(40) = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). SA alone (<i>M</i> = 1.97, <i>SD</i> = 9.30) was not more effective than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"13 1","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947967/pdf/nihms-845659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jsc.2016.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), <i>F</i>(1,59) = 4.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (<i>M</i> = 3.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.39) than control (<i>M</i> = 0.03, <i>SD</i> = 5.80; <i>t</i>(40) = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). SA alone (<i>M</i> = 1.97, <i>SD</i> = 9.30) was not more effective than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"55-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947967/pdf/nihms-845659.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2016.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2016.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:基于短信的干预措施具有巨大的干预潜力,而且随着信息技术的进步,这种干预措施的可行性也在不断提高:基于短信的干预措施具有巨大的干预潜力,而且随着信息技术的进步,其可行性也在不断提高。目的:本试验性随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较通过短信发送自我与专家撰写的戒烟内容的效果:62名年龄在25-66岁之间的参与者在30天的短信干预前后参加了实验室课程。参与者被随机分配到两种实验条件中的一种--仅自我撰写(SA)和带有实施意图的SA(SA+ii)--或积极对照组。参与者编写了 30-60 条简短的戒烟激励信息,在尝试戒烟时使用。SA+ii 参与者还被进一步指导如何预测障碍,并制定简单的 "如果-那么 "计划来克服这些障碍。实验组在干预阶段收到他们自己撰写的文本,而对照组参与者收到专家撰写的信息:总体而言,根据呼出一氧化碳(CO)的变化来衡量,吸烟率有所下降,F(1,59)= 4.43,P = 0.04。SA+ii组的一氧化碳减少量(M = 3.63,SD = 5.39)略高于对照组(M = 0.03,SD = 5.80;t(40) = 2.08,p = 0.04)。单用 SA(M = 1.97,SD = 9.30)并不比对照组更有效:SA似乎并不能提高疗效。然而,这项试验支持了之前的研究,表明基于文本的干预可以提高戒烟成功率,并可减少戒烟的心理症状。要确定提高干预效果的方法,还需要进行大量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.

Aims: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.

Methods: Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.

Results: Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), F(1,59) = 4.43, p = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (M = 3.63, SD = 5.39) than control (M = 0.03, SD = 5.80; t(40) = 2.08, p = 0.04). SA alone (M = 1.97, SD = 9.30) was not more effective than control.

Conclusions: SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1