{"title":"基于短信的吸烟干预使用信息自主权的有效性:试点研究。","authors":"Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2016.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), <i>F</i>(1,59) = 4.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (<i>M</i> = 3.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.39) than control (<i>M</i> = 0.03, <i>SD</i> = 5.80; <i>t</i>(40) = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). SA alone (<i>M</i> = 1.97, <i>SD</i> = 9.30) was not more effective than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"13 1","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947967/pdf/nihms-845659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Krista L DeStasio, Anne P Hill, Elliot T Berkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jsc.2016.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), <i>F</i>(1,59) = 4.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (<i>M</i> = 3.63, <i>SD</i> = 5.39) than control (<i>M</i> = 0.03, <i>SD</i> = 5.80; <i>t</i>(40) = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.04). SA alone (<i>M</i> = 1.97, <i>SD</i> = 9.30) was not more effective than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"55-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947967/pdf/nihms-845659.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2016.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2016.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of an SMS-Based Smoking Intervention Using Message Self-Authorship: A Pilot Study.
Introduction: Text-message-based interventions hold great potential for intervention and are increasingly feasible, given advances in information technology.
Aims: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy of self-versus expert-authored content delivered via text-messaging for smoking cessation.
Methods: Sixty-two participants aged 25-66 attended laboratory sessions pre- and post-30 days of text-messaging intervention. Participants were randomised to one of two experimental conditions - self-authorship (SA) only and SA with implementation intentions (SA+ii) - or active control. Participants composed 30-60 brief motivational cessation messages for use during their cessation attempt. SA+ii participants were further instructed to anticipate obstacles and form simple if-then plans to overcome them. Experimental groups received their self-authored texts during the intervention phase, whereas control participants received expert-authored messages.
Results: Overall, smoking decreased as measured by change in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), F(1,59) = 4.43, p = 0.04. The SA+ii group showed slightly greater CO reduction (M = 3.63, SD = 5.39) than control (M = 0.03, SD = 5.80; t(40) = 2.08, p = 0.04). SA alone (M = 1.97, SD = 9.30) was not more effective than control.
Conclusions: SA does not appear to increase efficacy. However, this pilot supports prior research, indicating that text-based interventions can increase smoking cessation success and may decrease psychological symptoms of withdrawal. Much research is needed to identify ways to bolster intervention efficacy.