Jacob Y Cao, Seung Yeon Lee, Kevin Phan, David S Celermajer, Sean Lal
{"title":"肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮抑制改善右心室功能:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Jacob Y Cao, Seung Yeon Lee, Kevin Phan, David S Celermajer, Sean Lal","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are well established for left ventricular dysfunction, but remain unknown for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to investigate the role of RAAS inhibition on RV function in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched and 12 studies were included for statistical synthesis, comprising 265 RAAS inhibition treatment patients and 265 placebo control patients. The treatment arm showed a trend towards increased RV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.95, 95% CI -0.12 to 2.02, p=0.08) compared with the control arm. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards improvement in RV ejection fraction in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers compared with control (WMD=1.11, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.26, p=0.06), but not in the respective comparison for ACE inhibitors (WMD=0.07, 95% CI -2.74 to 2.87, p>0.05). No differences were shown between the two groups with regard to maximal oxygen consumption, RV end-systolic volume, RV end-diastolic volume, duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and resting and maximal heart rate. Mild adverse drug reactions were common but evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups. The current meta-analysis highlights that there may be a role for RAAS inhibition, particularly treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers, in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. However, further confirmation will be required by larger prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":"10 1","pages":"e010999"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition improves right ventricular function: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Y Cao, Seung Yeon Lee, Kevin Phan, David S Celermajer, Sean Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The benefits of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are well established for left ventricular dysfunction, but remain unknown for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to investigate the role of RAAS inhibition on RV function in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched and 12 studies were included for statistical synthesis, comprising 265 RAAS inhibition treatment patients and 265 placebo control patients. The treatment arm showed a trend towards increased RV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.95, 95% CI -0.12 to 2.02, p=0.08) compared with the control arm. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards improvement in RV ejection fraction in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers compared with control (WMD=1.11, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.26, p=0.06), but not in the respective comparison for ACE inhibitors (WMD=0.07, 95% CI -2.74 to 2.87, p>0.05). No differences were shown between the two groups with regard to maximal oxygen consumption, RV end-systolic volume, RV end-diastolic volume, duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and resting and maximal heart rate. Mild adverse drug reactions were common but evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups. The current meta-analysis highlights that there may be a role for RAAS inhibition, particularly treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers, in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. However, further confirmation will be required by larger prospective trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Asia\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"e010999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2018-010999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
抑制肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)对左心室功能障碍的益处已得到证实,但对右心室功能障碍的益处尚不清楚。当前荟萃分析的目的是研究RAAS抑制对有或有右心室功能障碍风险的右心室功能的作用。系统检索Medline、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane文库,纳入12项研究进行统计综合,包括265例RAAS抑制治疗患者和265例安慰剂对照患者。与对照组相比,治疗组右心室射血分数有增加的趋势(加权平均差(WMD)=0.95, 95% CI -0.12 ~ 2.02, p=0.08)。亚组分析显示,与对照组相比,接受血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的患者RV射血分数有改善的趋势(WMD=1.11, 95% CI -0.02 ~ 2.26, p=0.06),但与ACE抑制剂治疗的患者相比,WMD=0.07, 95% CI -2.74 ~ 2.87, p>0.05)。两组在最大耗氧量、右心室收缩末容积、右心室舒张末容积、心肺运动试验持续时间、静息心率和最大心率方面均无差异。轻度药物不良反应常见,但在治疗组和对照组之间分布均匀。当前的荟萃分析强调,RAAS抑制,特别是血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗,可能在那些有或有RV功能障碍风险的患者中发挥作用。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性试验进一步证实。
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition improves right ventricular function: a meta-analysis.
The benefits of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are well established for left ventricular dysfunction, but remain unknown for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to investigate the role of RAAS inhibition on RV function in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched and 12 studies were included for statistical synthesis, comprising 265 RAAS inhibition treatment patients and 265 placebo control patients. The treatment arm showed a trend towards increased RV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.95, 95% CI -0.12 to 2.02, p=0.08) compared with the control arm. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a trend towards improvement in RV ejection fraction in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers compared with control (WMD=1.11, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.26, p=0.06), but not in the respective comparison for ACE inhibitors (WMD=0.07, 95% CI -2.74 to 2.87, p>0.05). No differences were shown between the two groups with regard to maximal oxygen consumption, RV end-systolic volume, RV end-diastolic volume, duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and resting and maximal heart rate. Mild adverse drug reactions were common but evenly distributed between the treatment and control groups. The current meta-analysis highlights that there may be a role for RAAS inhibition, particularly treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers, in those with or at risk of RV dysfunction. However, further confirmation will be required by larger prospective trials.