{"title":"烧伤中异位骨化的发展和影响:四十年研究综述。","authors":"Rachel Kornhaber, Nichola Foster, Dale Edgar, Denis Visentin, Elad Ofir, Josef Haik, Moti Harats","doi":"10.1177/2059513117695659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of lamellar bone within connective and other tissue where bone should not form and is a rare complication after burn injury. However, it leads to severe pain and distress, marked reduction in joint range of motion (ROM), impaired function and increased hospital length of stay. The pathophysiology, incidence and risk factors of HO remain poorly understood in burns and other traumas and the management, controversial. The aim of this comprehensive review, therefore, was to synthesise the available evidence on the development and treatment of HO after acute burn injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was based on a systematic search of five electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthesis and analysis of the data highlighted that, despite the passage of time, little translatable evidence is available to guide any prevention, screening, diagnostic or pharmacological or physical management protocols.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Causes of HO remain confounded, therefore prevention is difficult. Although spontaneous resolution is possible, surgical resection remains the recommended treatment when ROM and activities of daily living are severely affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from this review indicate that multicentre data pooling is needed to understand the optimum pathway to prevention, identification and treatment of HO in acute burn patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/c7/10.1177_2059513117695659.PMC5965316.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and impact of heterotopic ossification in burns: a review of four decades of research.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Kornhaber, Nichola Foster, Dale Edgar, Denis Visentin, Elad Ofir, Josef Haik, Moti Harats\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2059513117695659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of lamellar bone within connective and other tissue where bone should not form and is a rare complication after burn injury. However, it leads to severe pain and distress, marked reduction in joint range of motion (ROM), impaired function and increased hospital length of stay. The pathophysiology, incidence and risk factors of HO remain poorly understood in burns and other traumas and the management, controversial. The aim of this comprehensive review, therefore, was to synthesise the available evidence on the development and treatment of HO after acute burn injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was based on a systematic search of five electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthesis and analysis of the data highlighted that, despite the passage of time, little translatable evidence is available to guide any prevention, screening, diagnostic or pharmacological or physical management protocols.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Causes of HO remain confounded, therefore prevention is difficult. Although spontaneous resolution is possible, surgical resection remains the recommended treatment when ROM and activities of daily living are severely affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from this review indicate that multicentre data pooling is needed to understand the optimum pathway to prevention, identification and treatment of HO in acute burn patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/c7/10.1177_2059513117695659.PMC5965316.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117695659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513117695659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:异位骨化(HO)是指在结缔组织和其他组织中不应形成骨的地方形成片状骨,是烧伤后一种罕见的并发症。然而,它会导致剧烈疼痛和痛苦、关节活动范围(ROM)明显缩小、功能受损和住院时间延长。人们对烧伤和其他创伤中 HO 的病理生理学、发病率和风险因素仍然知之甚少,对其管理也存在争议。因此,本综合综述旨在总结急性烧伤后 HO 的发生和治疗方面的现有证据:综述基于对 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、LILACS 和 Scopus 五个电子数据库的系统检索:结果:对数据的综合和分析突出表明,尽管时间已经过去了很长时间,但几乎没有可转化的证据可用于指导任何预防、筛查、诊断或药物或物理治疗方案:讨论:HO 的病因仍然扑朔迷离,因此很难预防。尽管有可能自发缓解,但当 ROM 和日常生活活动受到严重影响时,手术切除仍是推荐的治疗方法:本综述的研究结果表明,需要汇集多中心数据,以了解急性烧伤患者HO的预防、识别和治疗的最佳途径。
The development and impact of heterotopic ossification in burns: a review of four decades of research.
Introduction: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of lamellar bone within connective and other tissue where bone should not form and is a rare complication after burn injury. However, it leads to severe pain and distress, marked reduction in joint range of motion (ROM), impaired function and increased hospital length of stay. The pathophysiology, incidence and risk factors of HO remain poorly understood in burns and other traumas and the management, controversial. The aim of this comprehensive review, therefore, was to synthesise the available evidence on the development and treatment of HO after acute burn injury.
Methods: The review was based on a systematic search of five electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and Scopus.
Results: Synthesis and analysis of the data highlighted that, despite the passage of time, little translatable evidence is available to guide any prevention, screening, diagnostic or pharmacological or physical management protocols.
Discussion: Causes of HO remain confounded, therefore prevention is difficult. Although spontaneous resolution is possible, surgical resection remains the recommended treatment when ROM and activities of daily living are severely affected.
Conclusion: The findings from this review indicate that multicentre data pooling is needed to understand the optimum pathway to prevention, identification and treatment of HO in acute burn patients.