{"title":"因治疗和预防适应症而接受依诺肝素治疗的肥胖患者的抗因子 Xa 水平。","authors":"Linda Tahaineh, Sahar M Edaily, Shadi F Gharaibeh","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S161599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the degree of anticoagulation achieved with different enoxaparin dosing regimens used in obese and morbidly obese patients in a hospital setting in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All obese adult patients who were prescribed enoxaparin for various indications were invited to participate in the study. The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level was checked once after 4-6 hours of the third or fourth dose of enoxaparin (at steady state). Patients were followed daily to evaluate drug efficacy and safety through their hospital course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enoxaparin daily dose used for prophylaxis indications ranged from 0.3 to 0.85 mg/kg and from 0.31 to 2.25 mg/kg in case of certain treatment indications. Most participants who received enoxaparin for treatment indications (76.9%) were on capping dosing regimens, which was <1 mg/kg twice daily. On the other hand, most patients (88.5%) who received enoxaparin for prophylaxis indications were on a fixed 40 mg/d dose. Among the 52 patients who completed the study, 19 patients (36.5%) had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results showed no statistically significant associations between regimens that were used and achieving therapeutic anti-Xa level (<i>p</i>>0.05). No bleeding events or thrombocytopenia were noticed, and there was one case of recurrent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enoxaparin dosing regimens that were used for obese patients varied based on prescribing physicians. Regardless of the regimen used, the majority of participants had nontherapeutic anti-Xa. Individualized dosing regimens based on anti-Xa levels are warranted for obese patients on enoxaparin.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"10 ","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/c2/cpaa-10-063.PMC5965377.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-factor Xa levels in obese patients receiving enoxaparin for treatment and prophylaxis indications.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Tahaineh, Sahar M Edaily, Shadi F Gharaibeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S161599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the degree of anticoagulation achieved with different enoxaparin dosing regimens used in obese and morbidly obese patients in a hospital setting in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All obese adult patients who were prescribed enoxaparin for various indications were invited to participate in the study. The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level was checked once after 4-6 hours of the third or fourth dose of enoxaparin (at steady state). Patients were followed daily to evaluate drug efficacy and safety through their hospital course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enoxaparin daily dose used for prophylaxis indications ranged from 0.3 to 0.85 mg/kg and from 0.31 to 2.25 mg/kg in case of certain treatment indications. Most participants who received enoxaparin for treatment indications (76.9%) were on capping dosing regimens, which was <1 mg/kg twice daily. On the other hand, most patients (88.5%) who received enoxaparin for prophylaxis indications were on a fixed 40 mg/d dose. Among the 52 patients who completed the study, 19 patients (36.5%) had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results showed no statistically significant associations between regimens that were used and achieving therapeutic anti-Xa level (<i>p</i>>0.05). No bleeding events or thrombocytopenia were noticed, and there was one case of recurrent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enoxaparin dosing regimens that were used for obese patients varied based on prescribing physicians. Regardless of the regimen used, the majority of participants had nontherapeutic anti-Xa. Individualized dosing regimens based on anti-Xa levels are warranted for obese patients on enoxaparin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"63-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/c2/cpaa-10-063.PMC5965377.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S161599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S161599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估在约旦医院环境中肥胖和病态肥胖患者使用不同依诺肝素剂量方案所达到的抗凝程度:方法:邀请所有因各种适应症开具依诺肝素处方的肥胖成年患者参与研究。在服用第三或第四剂依诺肝素(稳态)4-6 小时后检测一次抗因子 Xa(抗-Xa)水平。在住院期间,每天对患者进行随访,以评估药物的疗效和安全性:结果:用于预防适应症的依诺肝素日剂量为 0.3 至 0.85 毫克/千克,用于某些治疗适应症的剂量为 0.31 至 2.25 毫克/千克。大多数因治疗适应症而接受依诺肝素治疗的参与者(76.9%)都采用了封顶剂量方案,P>0.05)。未发现出血事件或血小板减少症,有一例复发性血栓形成:结论:肥胖患者使用的依诺肝素给药方案因处方医生而异。结论:肥胖患者使用的依诺肝素剂量方案因处方医生而异,无论使用哪种方案,大多数参与者的抗 Xa 抗体都没有达到治疗效果。使用依诺肝素的肥胖患者需要根据抗 Xa 水平制定个性化的给药方案。
Anti-factor Xa levels in obese patients receiving enoxaparin for treatment and prophylaxis indications.
Objectives: To evaluate the degree of anticoagulation achieved with different enoxaparin dosing regimens used in obese and morbidly obese patients in a hospital setting in Jordan.
Methods: All obese adult patients who were prescribed enoxaparin for various indications were invited to participate in the study. The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) level was checked once after 4-6 hours of the third or fourth dose of enoxaparin (at steady state). Patients were followed daily to evaluate drug efficacy and safety through their hospital course.
Results: Enoxaparin daily dose used for prophylaxis indications ranged from 0.3 to 0.85 mg/kg and from 0.31 to 2.25 mg/kg in case of certain treatment indications. Most participants who received enoxaparin for treatment indications (76.9%) were on capping dosing regimens, which was <1 mg/kg twice daily. On the other hand, most patients (88.5%) who received enoxaparin for prophylaxis indications were on a fixed 40 mg/d dose. Among the 52 patients who completed the study, 19 patients (36.5%) had therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results showed no statistically significant associations between regimens that were used and achieving therapeutic anti-Xa level (p>0.05). No bleeding events or thrombocytopenia were noticed, and there was one case of recurrent thrombosis.
Conclusion: Enoxaparin dosing regimens that were used for obese patients varied based on prescribing physicians. Regardless of the regimen used, the majority of participants had nontherapeutic anti-Xa. Individualized dosing regimens based on anti-Xa levels are warranted for obese patients on enoxaparin.