E A Bayliss, H A Tabano, T M Gill, K Anzuoni, M Tai-Seale, H G Allore, D A Ganz, S Dublin, A L Gruber-Baldini, A L Adams, K M Mazor
{"title":"患者报告结果应用的数据管理。","authors":"E A Bayliss, H A Tabano, T M Gill, K Anzuoni, M Tai-Seale, H G Allore, D A Ganz, S Dublin, A L Gruber-Baldini, A L Adams, K M Mazor","doi":"10.5334/egems.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are one means of systematically gathering meaningful subjective information for patient care, population health, and patient centered outcomes research. However, optimal data management for effective PRO applications is unclear.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Delivery systems associated with the Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) have implemented PRO data collection as part of the Medicare annual Health Risk Assessment (HRA). A questionnaire assessed data content, collection, storage, and extractability in HCSRN delivery systems.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Responses were received from 15 (83.3 percent) of 18 sites. The proportion of Medicare beneficiaries completing an HRA ranged from less than 10 to 42 percent. Most sites collected core HRA elements and 10 collected information on additional domains such as social support. Measures for core domains varied across sites. Data were collected at and prior to visits. Modes included paper, clinician entry, patient portals, and interactive voice response. Data were stored in the electronic health record (EHR) in scanned documents, free text, and discrete fields, and in summary databases.</p><p><strong>Major themes: </strong>PRO implementation requires effectively collecting, storing, extracting, and applying patient-reported data. Standardizing PRO measures and storing data in extractable formats can facilitate multi-site uses for PRO data, while access to individual PROs in the EHR may be sufficient for use at the point of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collecting comparable PRO data elements, storing data in extractable fields, and collecting data from a higher proportion of eligible respondents represents an optimal approach to support multi-site applications of PRO information.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data Management for Applications of Patient Reported Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"E A Bayliss, H A Tabano, T M Gill, K Anzuoni, M Tai-Seale, H G Allore, D A Ganz, S Dublin, A L Gruber-Baldini, A L Adams, K M Mazor\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/egems.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are one means of systematically gathering meaningful subjective information for patient care, population health, and patient centered outcomes research. However, optimal data management for effective PRO applications is unclear.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Delivery systems associated with the Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) have implemented PRO data collection as part of the Medicare annual Health Risk Assessment (HRA). A questionnaire assessed data content, collection, storage, and extractability in HCSRN delivery systems.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Responses were received from 15 (83.3 percent) of 18 sites. The proportion of Medicare beneficiaries completing an HRA ranged from less than 10 to 42 percent. Most sites collected core HRA elements and 10 collected information on additional domains such as social support. Measures for core domains varied across sites. Data were collected at and prior to visits. Modes included paper, clinician entry, patient portals, and interactive voice response. Data were stored in the electronic health record (EHR) in scanned documents, free text, and discrete fields, and in summary databases.</p><p><strong>Major themes: </strong>PRO implementation requires effectively collecting, storing, extracting, and applying patient-reported data. Standardizing PRO measures and storing data in extractable formats can facilitate multi-site uses for PRO data, while access to individual PROs in the EHR may be sufficient for use at the point of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collecting comparable PRO data elements, storing data in extractable fields, and collecting data from a higher proportion of eligible respondents represents an optimal approach to support multi-site applications of PRO information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5983068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:患者报告结果(PROs)是为患者护理、人口健康和以患者为中心的结果研究系统收集有意义的主观信息的一种手段。然而,有效应用患者报告结果的最佳数据管理尚不明确:与医疗保健系统研究网络(HCSRN)相关的服务系统已实施了PRO数据收集,作为医疗保险年度健康风险评估(HRA)的一部分。一份调查问卷对 HCSRN 交付系统的数据内容、收集、存储和提取能力进行了评估:18 个医疗点中有 15 个(83.3%)做出了回复。完成 HRA 的医疗保险受益人比例从不到 10% 到 42% 不等。大多数医疗点收集了 HRA 核心要素,10 个医疗点收集了社会支持等其他领域的信息。各医疗机构对核心领域的衡量标准不尽相同。数据在就诊时和就诊前收集。收集方式包括纸质、临床医生输入、患者门户和交互式语音应答。数据以扫描文件、自由文本、离散字段和摘要数据库的形式存储在电子健康记录(EHR)中:PRO的实施需要有效地收集、存储、提取和应用患者报告的数据。将 PRO 测量标准化并以可提取格式存储数据可促进 PRO 数据的多站点使用,而在 EHR 中访问单个 PRO 可能足以在护理点使用:收集具有可比性的 PRO 数据元素、将数据存储在可提取的字段中、从更高比例的合格受访者中收集数据,是支持 PRO 信息多站点应用的最佳方法。
Data Management for Applications of Patient Reported Outcomes.
Context: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are one means of systematically gathering meaningful subjective information for patient care, population health, and patient centered outcomes research. However, optimal data management for effective PRO applications is unclear.
Case description: Delivery systems associated with the Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) have implemented PRO data collection as part of the Medicare annual Health Risk Assessment (HRA). A questionnaire assessed data content, collection, storage, and extractability in HCSRN delivery systems.
Findings: Responses were received from 15 (83.3 percent) of 18 sites. The proportion of Medicare beneficiaries completing an HRA ranged from less than 10 to 42 percent. Most sites collected core HRA elements and 10 collected information on additional domains such as social support. Measures for core domains varied across sites. Data were collected at and prior to visits. Modes included paper, clinician entry, patient portals, and interactive voice response. Data were stored in the electronic health record (EHR) in scanned documents, free text, and discrete fields, and in summary databases.
Major themes: PRO implementation requires effectively collecting, storing, extracting, and applying patient-reported data. Standardizing PRO measures and storing data in extractable formats can facilitate multi-site uses for PRO data, while access to individual PROs in the EHR may be sufficient for use at the point of care.
Conclusion: Collecting comparable PRO data elements, storing data in extractable fields, and collecting data from a higher proportion of eligible respondents represents an optimal approach to support multi-site applications of PRO information.