{"title":"美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民妇女产后抑郁症筛查:两种工具的比较。","authors":"Jennifer L Heck","doi":"10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examined validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to identify an appropriate postpartum depression (PPD) screening tool for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women in the U.S. Databases were searched using: EPDS paired with psychometric properties or validation and PHQ-9 paired with PPD and psychometric properties or validation, yielding a final sample of 58 articles. Both tools have good internal consistency, but discriminative validity for detecting PPD in women from non-Western cultures is low. Positive predictive values in these women are low and diverse (EPDS [n = 21] median 67%, range 21.1-90%; PHQ-9 [n = 1] median 26%). The low predictive accuracy of both tools suggests the tools may be culturally biased.</p>","PeriodicalId":72159,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"25 2","pages":"74-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Postpartum Depression in American Indian/Alaska Native Women: A Comparison of Two Instruments.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Heck\",\"doi\":\"10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review examined validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to identify an appropriate postpartum depression (PPD) screening tool for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women in the U.S. Databases were searched using: EPDS paired with psychometric properties or validation and PHQ-9 paired with PPD and psychometric properties or validation, yielding a final sample of 58 articles. Both tools have good internal consistency, but discriminative validity for detecting PPD in women from non-Western cultures is low. Positive predictive values in these women are low and diverse (EPDS [n = 21] median 67%, range 21.1-90%; PHQ-9 [n = 1] median 26%). The low predictive accuracy of both tools suggests the tools may be culturally biased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"74-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2502.2018.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening for Postpartum Depression in American Indian/Alaska Native Women: A Comparison of Two Instruments.
This review examined validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to identify an appropriate postpartum depression (PPD) screening tool for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women in the U.S. Databases were searched using: EPDS paired with psychometric properties or validation and PHQ-9 paired with PPD and psychometric properties or validation, yielding a final sample of 58 articles. Both tools have good internal consistency, but discriminative validity for detecting PPD in women from non-Western cultures is low. Positive predictive values in these women are low and diverse (EPDS [n = 21] median 67%, range 21.1-90%; PHQ-9 [n = 1] median 26%). The low predictive accuracy of both tools suggests the tools may be culturally biased.