Usharani Nimmagadda, M Ramez Salem, Dimitry Voronov, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
{"title":"在实现最大的预充氧方面,NuMask®与面膜一样有效。","authors":"Usharani Nimmagadda, M Ramez Salem, Dimitry Voronov, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction is a widely accepted maneuver to\nincrease oxygen reserves and delay desaturation during apnea. There is limited data regarding the\nuse of the NuMask® in the perioperative setting, and no data as to its efficacy in achieving maximal\npreoxygenation. We hypothesize that the NuMask® may be a useful alternative to the face mask in\nachieving maximal preoxygenation.\nMethods: After IRB approval, the NuMask® was compared with the classic face mask\nwith respect to achieving maximal pre-oxygenation in 30 healthy volunteers using tidal volume\nbreathing. All volunteers were tested for three periods of 5 minutes intervals and the following\nparameters were recorded every 30 seconds: inspired, and end-tidal oxygen concentration and endtidal\ncarbon dioxide concentration.\nResults: The mean ETO2 of ≥90% was achieved with both masks at 3.5 minutes (SD =\n1.62 and 1.98 for facemask and NuMask® respectively) and thereafter the ETO2 remained above\n90%. There were no statistical differences noted in FiO2 and ETO2 between the face mask and the\nNuMask® in the same time periods. ETCO2 values were also not statistically different between the\ntwo masks.\nConclusions: The study showed that the NuMask® is as effective as the classic face mask in\nachieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing.\nIntroduction</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"23 6","pages":"605-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation.\",\"authors\":\"Usharani Nimmagadda, M Ramez Salem, Dimitry Voronov, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background: Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction is a widely accepted maneuver to\\nincrease oxygen reserves and delay desaturation during apnea. There is limited data regarding the\\nuse of the NuMask® in the perioperative setting, and no data as to its efficacy in achieving maximal\\npreoxygenation. We hypothesize that the NuMask® may be a useful alternative to the face mask in\\nachieving maximal preoxygenation.\\nMethods: After IRB approval, the NuMask® was compared with the classic face mask\\nwith respect to achieving maximal pre-oxygenation in 30 healthy volunteers using tidal volume\\nbreathing. All volunteers were tested for three periods of 5 minutes intervals and the following\\nparameters were recorded every 30 seconds: inspired, and end-tidal oxygen concentration and endtidal\\ncarbon dioxide concentration.\\nResults: The mean ETO2 of ≥90% was achieved with both masks at 3.5 minutes (SD =\\n1.62 and 1.98 for facemask and NuMask® respectively) and thereafter the ETO2 remained above\\n90%. There were no statistical differences noted in FiO2 and ETO2 between the face mask and the\\nNuMask® in the same time periods. ETCO2 values were also not statistically different between the\\ntwo masks.\\nConclusions: The study showed that the NuMask® is as effective as the classic face mask in\\nachieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing.\\nIntroduction</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"605-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The NuMask® is as Effective as the Face Mask in Achieving Maximal Preoxygentation.
Background: Preoxygenation before anesthetic induction is a widely accepted maneuver to
increase oxygen reserves and delay desaturation during apnea. There is limited data regarding the
use of the NuMask® in the perioperative setting, and no data as to its efficacy in achieving maximal
preoxygenation. We hypothesize that the NuMask® may be a useful alternative to the face mask in
achieving maximal preoxygenation.
Methods: After IRB approval, the NuMask® was compared with the classic face mask
with respect to achieving maximal pre-oxygenation in 30 healthy volunteers using tidal volume
breathing. All volunteers were tested for three periods of 5 minutes intervals and the following
parameters were recorded every 30 seconds: inspired, and end-tidal oxygen concentration and endtidal
carbon dioxide concentration.
Results: The mean ETO2 of ≥90% was achieved with both masks at 3.5 minutes (SD =
1.62 and 1.98 for facemask and NuMask® respectively) and thereafter the ETO2 remained above
90%. There were no statistical differences noted in FiO2 and ETO2 between the face mask and the
NuMask® in the same time periods. ETCO2 values were also not statistically different between the
two masks.
Conclusions: The study showed that the NuMask® is as effective as the classic face mask in
achieving maximal pre-oxygenation during tidal volume breathing.
Introduction
期刊介绍:
The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.