在印度、哥伦比亚和苏里南用阿奇霉素和氯喹治疗成人急性无并发症疟疾。

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine Pub Date : 2017-10-13 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRTM.S129741
Nilima A Kshirsagar, Nithya J Gogtay, Diego Moran, Gregory Utz, Ashok Sethia, Shirsendu Sarkar, Pol Vandenbroucke
{"title":"在印度、哥伦比亚和苏里南用阿奇霉素和氯喹治疗成人急性无并发症疟疾。","authors":"Nilima A Kshirsagar,&nbsp;Nithya J Gogtay,&nbsp;Diego Moran,&nbsp;Gregory Utz,&nbsp;Ashok Sethia,&nbsp;Shirsendu Sarkar,&nbsp;Pol Vandenbroucke","doi":"10.2147/RRTM.S129741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the use of azithromycin-chloroquine (AZCQ) for the treatment of malaria, we conducted double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority studies in India, Colombia, and Suriname comparing the combination of azithromycin 1 g and chloroquine (CQ) 600 mg base once daily (QD) for 3 days versus atovaquone-proguanil (AP) or chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SPCQ) in adults with acute uncomplicated <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were hospitalized until three documented negative blood smears and followed through Day 42. The primary end point was parasitologic cure at Day 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In India, parasite clearance rates were 84% and 94% for AZCQ and SPCQ, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference: -22.6, 0.8). In Colombia and Suriname, parasite clearance rates were 57% and 99% for AZCQ and AP, respectively (95% CI: -52, -32). A subsequent open-label, non-comparative third study using a 2 g dose of azithromycin and 600 mg of CQ in India and Colombia resulted in an overall efficacy rate of 97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In India, Colombia, and Suriname, 1 g azithromycin with CQ QD for 3 days was inferior to established comparator agents. An improved response rate was observed when the dose of azithromycin was increased to 2 g.</p>","PeriodicalId":21138,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RRTM.S129741","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of adults with acute uncomplicated malaria with azithromycin and chloroquine in India, Colombia, and Suriname.\",\"authors\":\"Nilima A Kshirsagar,&nbsp;Nithya J Gogtay,&nbsp;Diego Moran,&nbsp;Gregory Utz,&nbsp;Ashok Sethia,&nbsp;Shirsendu Sarkar,&nbsp;Pol Vandenbroucke\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RRTM.S129741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the use of azithromycin-chloroquine (AZCQ) for the treatment of malaria, we conducted double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority studies in India, Colombia, and Suriname comparing the combination of azithromycin 1 g and chloroquine (CQ) 600 mg base once daily (QD) for 3 days versus atovaquone-proguanil (AP) or chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SPCQ) in adults with acute uncomplicated <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were hospitalized until three documented negative blood smears and followed through Day 42. The primary end point was parasitologic cure at Day 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In India, parasite clearance rates were 84% and 94% for AZCQ and SPCQ, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference: -22.6, 0.8). In Colombia and Suriname, parasite clearance rates were 57% and 99% for AZCQ and AP, respectively (95% CI: -52, -32). A subsequent open-label, non-comparative third study using a 2 g dose of azithromycin and 600 mg of CQ in India and Colombia resulted in an overall efficacy rate of 97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In India, Colombia, and Suriname, 1 g azithromycin with CQ QD for 3 days was inferior to established comparator agents. An improved response rate was observed when the dose of azithromycin was increased to 2 g.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RRTM.S129741\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S129741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S129741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:为了探讨阿奇霉素-氯喹(AZCQ)治疗疟疾的效果,我们在印度、哥伦比亚和苏里南进行了双盲、随机、非效性研究,比较了阿奇霉素1 g加氯喹(CQ) 600 mg碱基(QD)联合用药3天与阿托伐醌-原胍(AP)或氯喹加磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SPCQ)治疗急性无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾成人患者的疗效。方法:患者住院至三次血涂片阴性,随访至第42天。主要终点为第28天的寄生虫学治愈。结果:在印度,AZCQ和SPCQ的寄生虫清除率分别为84%和94%(差异的95%置信区间[CI]: -22.6, 0.8)。在哥伦比亚和苏里南,AZCQ和AP的寄生虫清除率分别为57%和99% (95% CI: -52, -32)。随后在印度和哥伦比亚进行了一项开放标签、非比较的第三项研究,使用2g剂量的阿奇霉素和600毫克CQ,总有效率为97%。结论:在印度、哥伦比亚和苏里南,1 g阿奇霉素加CQ QD治疗3天的疗效低于已建立的比较药物。当阿奇霉素剂量增加到2 g时,有效率有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of adults with acute uncomplicated malaria with azithromycin and chloroquine in India, Colombia, and Suriname.

Background: To explore the use of azithromycin-chloroquine (AZCQ) for the treatment of malaria, we conducted double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority studies in India, Colombia, and Suriname comparing the combination of azithromycin 1 g and chloroquine (CQ) 600 mg base once daily (QD) for 3 days versus atovaquone-proguanil (AP) or chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SPCQ) in adults with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Methods: Patients were hospitalized until three documented negative blood smears and followed through Day 42. The primary end point was parasitologic cure at Day 28.

Results: In India, parasite clearance rates were 84% and 94% for AZCQ and SPCQ, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference: -22.6, 0.8). In Colombia and Suriname, parasite clearance rates were 57% and 99% for AZCQ and AP, respectively (95% CI: -52, -32). A subsequent open-label, non-comparative third study using a 2 g dose of azithromycin and 600 mg of CQ in India and Colombia resulted in an overall efficacy rate of 97%.

Conclusion: In India, Colombia, and Suriname, 1 g azithromycin with CQ QD for 3 days was inferior to established comparator agents. An improved response rate was observed when the dose of azithromycin was increased to 2 g.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
HHV8-Associated Multicentric Castleman Disease: A Case Report on a Rare Complication of HIV in a Low-Income Setting. Demographic, Clinical, Radiological, and Surgical Outcome of Patients with Intestinal Tuberculosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Unusual Presentation of Pleural Space Ascariasis Infection from Eastern Sudan: A Case Report. Mvolo County, an Onchocerciasis Endemic Area in Western Equatoria State, South Sudan: An Entomological Study to Prepare for a “Slash and Clear” Community-Based Vector Control Intervention Exploring the Role of Community Involvement in Reducing the Burden of Schistosomiasis and Other Neglected Tropical Diseases in Malawi: Where are We in the Fight Against Neglected Tropical Diseases?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1