动词时态如何影响动作的解释:一般过去时使人们进入一种抽象的思维方式。

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psicologica Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Pilar Carrera, Dolores Muñoz, Amparo Caballero, Itziar Fernández, Pilar Aguilar, Dolores Albarracín
{"title":"动词时态如何影响动作的解释:一般过去时使人们进入一种抽象的思维方式。","authors":"Pilar Carrera,&nbsp;Dolores Muñoz,&nbsp;Amparo Caballero,&nbsp;Itziar Fernández,&nbsp;Pilar Aguilar,&nbsp;Dolores Albarracín","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments examined the influence of verb tense on how abstractly people construe action representations. Experiment 1 revealed that written descriptions of several daily events using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense) resulted in actions and the action's target being seen as less likely and less familiar, respectively. In Experiment 2 participants wrote about a personal episode of binge drinking (using the simple past tense vs. simple present tense), and the resulting narratives were coded using the Linguistic Category Model (see Semin & Fiedler, 1991). Results revealed that events were described at a more abstract level when texts were written using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense). The results are discussed in the context of other effects of verb form and in relation to construal level of events.</p>","PeriodicalId":45405,"journal":{"name":"Psicologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103618/pdf/nihms934557.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How verb tense affects the construal of action: The simple past tense leads people into an abstract mindset.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Carrera,&nbsp;Dolores Muñoz,&nbsp;Amparo Caballero,&nbsp;Itziar Fernández,&nbsp;Pilar Aguilar,&nbsp;Dolores Albarracín\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two experiments examined the influence of verb tense on how abstractly people construe action representations. Experiment 1 revealed that written descriptions of several daily events using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense) resulted in actions and the action's target being seen as less likely and less familiar, respectively. In Experiment 2 participants wrote about a personal episode of binge drinking (using the simple past tense vs. simple present tense), and the resulting narratives were coded using the Linguistic Category Model (see Semin & Fiedler, 1991). Results revealed that events were described at a more abstract level when texts were written using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense). The results are discussed in the context of other effects of verb form and in relation to construal level of events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103618/pdf/nihms934557.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两个实验考察了动词时态对人们如何抽象地解释动作表征的影响。实验1显示,使用一般过去时(相对于一般现在时)对几个日常事件进行书面描述,会导致行动和行动目标分别被视为不太可能发生和不太熟悉。在实验2中,参与者用一般过去时和一般现在时描述个人酗酒的经历,并使用语言范畴模型对结果进行编码(见Semin & Fiedler, 1991)。结果显示,当使用一般过去时(而不是一般现在时)写文章时,事件的描述在更抽象的层面上。这些结果在动词形式的其他影响以及与事件解释水平的关系中进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How verb tense affects the construal of action: The simple past tense leads people into an abstract mindset.

Two experiments examined the influence of verb tense on how abstractly people construe action representations. Experiment 1 revealed that written descriptions of several daily events using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense) resulted in actions and the action's target being seen as less likely and less familiar, respectively. In Experiment 2 participants wrote about a personal episode of binge drinking (using the simple past tense vs. simple present tense), and the resulting narratives were coded using the Linguistic Category Model (see Semin & Fiedler, 1991). Results revealed that events were described at a more abstract level when texts were written using the simple past tense (vs. simple present tense). The results are discussed in the context of other effects of verb form and in relation to construal level of events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologica
Psicologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: PSICOLOGICA was born in 1980 as an instrument for publication of articles in Methodology and Experimental Psychology. It is published in 1 volume per year (2 issues) by the Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences of the University of Valencia (Spain) (Legal Dep.: -1419-1981. print ISSN 0211-2159, electronic ISSN 1576-8597). We maintain a MAILING LIST with the addresses of all interested readers to keep them periodically informed of accepted papers and news. If you are interested in receiving (SUBSCRIBING-UNSUBSCRIBING) this information, please fill out and send to us the following form.
期刊最新文献
Discrimination of acoustic patterns in rats using the water T-maze. How verb tense affects the construal of action: The simple past tense leads people into an abstract mindset.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1