心理学/哲学关系的变化:恩佐·博纳旺蒂拉1914年调查对学术教学的影响。

Glauco Ceccarelli
{"title":"心理学/哲学关系的变化:恩佐·博纳旺蒂拉1914年调查对学术教学的影响。","authors":"Glauco Ceccarelli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the relationship between psychology and philosophy, a complex issue that has for a long time affected the route towards the autonomy of the psychological disciplines. An issue that in Italy in particular has been the subject of intense debate, which lasted for several decades of the twentieth century. In this contribution a specific and rather unusual perspective has been chosen, that of the academic teaching of psychology, which in its subsequent transformations significantly reflected the developments in those debates. The specific object of the research reported here is a pioneering survey conducted in 1914 by Enzo Bonaventura on behalf of the Association of Psychological Studies, of Florence, with the aim of knowing the teaching conditions of psychology in many foreign countries. Following the detailed account of the author and proposing a series of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time psychology took its first steps, and in those where its presence in the University was well established. An in-depth analysis is dedicated to the situation in Germany, where psychology is taught by chairs formally \"entitled\" to philosophy; a situation, this, that gives rise to controversies and contrasts, punctually and widely reported by Bonaventura. The article closes with the recovery of an intervention of Vittorio Benussi regarding the \"place\" of psychology among the recognized sciences, thus further testifying how long the debate in Italy has continued on both the epistemological plane and on that of academic teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"50 1-2","pages":"365-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DECLINAZIONI DEL RAPPORTO PSICOLOGIA0FILOSOFIA: RIFLESSI SULL'INSEGNAMENTO ACCADEMICO NELL'INCHIESTA DI ENZO BONAVENTURA DEL 1914.\",\"authors\":\"Glauco Ceccarelli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the relationship between psychology and philosophy, a complex issue that has for a long time affected the route towards the autonomy of the psychological disciplines. An issue that in Italy in particular has been the subject of intense debate, which lasted for several decades of the twentieth century. In this contribution a specific and rather unusual perspective has been chosen, that of the academic teaching of psychology, which in its subsequent transformations significantly reflected the developments in those debates. The specific object of the research reported here is a pioneering survey conducted in 1914 by Enzo Bonaventura on behalf of the Association of Psychological Studies, of Florence, with the aim of knowing the teaching conditions of psychology in many foreign countries. Following the detailed account of the author and proposing a series of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time psychology took its first steps, and in those where its presence in the University was well established. An in-depth analysis is dedicated to the situation in Germany, where psychology is taught by chairs formally \\\"entitled\\\" to philosophy; a situation, this, that gives rise to controversies and contrasts, punctually and widely reported by Bonaventura. The article closes with the recovery of an intervention of Vittorio Benussi regarding the \\\"place\\\" of psychology among the recognized sciences, thus further testifying how long the debate in Italy has continued on both the epistemological plane and on that of academic teaching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"volume\":\"50 1-2\",\"pages\":\"365-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理学与哲学的关系是一个长期影响心理学学科走向自主的复杂问题。特别是在意大利,这个问题一直是激烈辩论的主题,持续了二十世纪的几十年。在这篇文章中,我们选择了一个特定的、相当不同寻常的视角,即心理学的学术教学,它在随后的转变中显著地反映了这些辩论的发展。这里报告的具体研究对象是恩佐·博纳文图拉在1914年代表佛罗伦萨心理学研究协会进行的一项开创性调查,目的是了解许多国家的心理学教学状况。在作者的详细叙述和提出一系列评论之后,这篇文章描述了在发表评论时的国家的情况,这篇文章描述了当时心理学迈出第一步的国家的情况,以及在大学中建立了心理学的国家的情况。对德国的情况进行了深入的分析,在德国,教授心理学的教授是正式“授予”哲学学位的教授;这种情况引起了争议和对比,博纳文图拉及时和广泛地报道了这一情况。文章以维托里奥·贝努西(Vittorio Benussi)关于心理学在公认科学中的“地位”的介入的恢复结束,从而进一步证明了意大利在认识论层面和学术教学层面上的辩论持续了多长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DECLINAZIONI DEL RAPPORTO PSICOLOGIA0FILOSOFIA: RIFLESSI SULL'INSEGNAMENTO ACCADEMICO NELL'INCHIESTA DI ENZO BONAVENTURA DEL 1914.

This article examines the relationship between psychology and philosophy, a complex issue that has for a long time affected the route towards the autonomy of the psychological disciplines. An issue that in Italy in particular has been the subject of intense debate, which lasted for several decades of the twentieth century. In this contribution a specific and rather unusual perspective has been chosen, that of the academic teaching of psychology, which in its subsequent transformations significantly reflected the developments in those debates. The specific object of the research reported here is a pioneering survey conducted in 1914 by Enzo Bonaventura on behalf of the Association of Psychological Studies, of Florence, with the aim of knowing the teaching conditions of psychology in many foreign countries. Following the detailed account of the author and proposing a series of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time of comments, the article describes the situation both in the countries where at the time psychology took its first steps, and in those where its presence in the University was well established. An in-depth analysis is dedicated to the situation in Germany, where psychology is taught by chairs formally "entitled" to philosophy; a situation, this, that gives rise to controversies and contrasts, punctually and widely reported by Bonaventura. The article closes with the recovery of an intervention of Vittorio Benussi regarding the "place" of psychology among the recognized sciences, thus further testifying how long the debate in Italy has continued on both the epistemological plane and on that of academic teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FRANCO RASETTI, A ASCIENTIS ACROSS PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY. IL SORRISO DEL BABBUINO. I PROBLEMI DELL'EVOLUZIONE VISTI DA UN FISICO. DECLINAZIONI DEL RAPPORTO PSICOLOGIA0FILOSOFIA: RIFLESSI SULL'INSEGNAMENTO ACCADEMICO NELL'INCHIESTA DI ENZO BONAVENTURA DEL 1914. MODELLI CHIMICI DEL VIVENTE LE ORIGINI DEL CENCETTO DI «MACCHINA CHIMICA». LE RICERCHE SPERIMENTALI DI ENZO BONAVENTURA SUL TEMPO SICOLOGICO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1