泰国全民健康覆盖系统中患者对医院就诊的看法:一项定性研究。

Q1 Medicine Asia Pacific Family Medicine Pub Date : 2018-09-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x
Apichai Wattanapisit, Udomsak Saengow
{"title":"泰国全民健康覆盖系统中患者对医院就诊的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Apichai Wattanapisit,&nbsp;Udomsak Saengow","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' perspectives regarding hospital visits in the universal health coverage system of Thailand: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Apichai Wattanapisit,&nbsp;Udomsak Saengow\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:2002年,泰国实施了全民健康覆盖政策,提高了卫生保健服务的可及性和公平性。十多年来,泰国政府和学术界一直把重点放在全民健康覆盖的大规模方面,包括有效性和影响。在这里,我们的目的是确定在全民健康覆盖下患者对医院就诊的看法。方法:对泰国农村四所公立医院进行定性研究。我们通过焦点小组讨论(fgd)和深度访谈(IDIs)收集数据。这份半结构式访谈指南旨在了解参保者对医院就诊的看法,包括参保者、社会保障参保者或公务员医疗福利参保者。使用专题方法对数据进行转录和分析。结果:29例患者(平均年龄56.76±16.65岁)参加了5例fgd和1例IDI。确定了新出现的主题和分主题。影响决定去医院的因素是免费保健服务、对严重疾病的认识、特殊检查的需要以及护理的连续性。等待时间过长是去医院就诊的障碍。在办公时间内不能离开工作岗位的雇员无法获得健康检查等服务。参与者认为,公立医院提供优质和公平的医疗服务。然而,共同制定治疗计划的情况并不常见。结论:利用卫生保健服务的因素和障碍为了解患者的就医行为提供了探索性数据。对全民健康覆盖下的免费服务的看法是积极的,但参与决策的情况很少。未来的研究应侧重于寻找平衡就诊需求和障碍的方法,并向医生和患者介绍共同决策的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' perspectives regarding hospital visits in the universal health coverage system of Thailand: a qualitative study.

Background: A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.

Methods: A qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.

Results: Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.

Conclusions: The factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Family Medicine
Asia Pacific Family Medicine Medicine-Family Practice
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards self-medication for their children: a cross-sectional study from Palestine Polarized Dermoscopy Facilitates Diagnosis and Treatment of Plantar Pseudohirsutism Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan The Food poisoning outbreak caused by diarrhoeal Bacillus Cereus in Tegalkenongo Village, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a retrospective study Sharing experience from Chinese General Practitioners to International colleagues on how to tackle COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1