手术室住院医师教育的“暂停”。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Lindsay E Clark Donat, Peter C Klatsky, Gary N Frishman
{"title":"手术室住院医师教育的“暂停”。","authors":"Lindsay E Clark Donat,&nbsp;Peter C Klatsky,&nbsp;Gary N Frishman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if asking residents to discuss their specific learning objectives with the attending physician prior to beginning a surgical case would improve the educational experience in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective nonrandomized cohort study utilizing a self-administered questionnaire. Prior to the intervention, residents and attendings were asked to fill out surveys evaluating the educational experience in the operating room. Subsequently, attending physicians were instructed to ask residents at the beginning of the surgery, \"What are your goals for this surgical case?\" During this intervention period, the same anonymous survey was filled out. Preintervention and postintervention answers were compared by t test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 preintervention and 47 postintervention resident-attending survey pairs were collected. After implementation of the intervention, 100% of residents reported having surgical goals for the procedure as compared to 45% prior to the intervention (p<0.0001). Additionally, during the intervention residents reported they were better able to maximize learning opportunities and were more satisfied with their participation in the case. Attending physicians were more likely to be aware of resident learning objectives after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose the routine addition of an educational pause to the surgical time out.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 11-12","pages":"534-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Pause\\\" for Resident Education in the Operating Room.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay E Clark Donat,&nbsp;Peter C Klatsky,&nbsp;Gary N Frishman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if asking residents to discuss their specific learning objectives with the attending physician prior to beginning a surgical case would improve the educational experience in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective nonrandomized cohort study utilizing a self-administered questionnaire. Prior to the intervention, residents and attendings were asked to fill out surveys evaluating the educational experience in the operating room. Subsequently, attending physicians were instructed to ask residents at the beginning of the surgery, \\\"What are your goals for this surgical case?\\\" During this intervention period, the same anonymous survey was filled out. Preintervention and postintervention answers were compared by t test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 preintervention and 47 postintervention resident-attending survey pairs were collected. After implementation of the intervention, 100% of residents reported having surgical goals for the procedure as compared to 45% prior to the intervention (p<0.0001). Additionally, during the intervention residents reported they were better able to maximize learning opportunities and were more satisfied with their participation in the case. Attending physicians were more likely to be aware of resident learning objectives after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose the routine addition of an educational pause to the surgical time out.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"61 11-12\",\"pages\":\"534-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定要求住院医师在开始手术前与主治医师讨论他们的具体学习目标是否会改善手术室的教育体验。研究设计:这是一项采用自我管理问卷的前瞻性非随机队列研究。在干预之前,住院医师和主治医师被要求填写调查问卷,评估手术室的教育经验。随后,主治医生被要求在手术开始时询问住院医生,“你的手术目标是什么?”在干预期间,同样的匿名调查也被填写。采用t检验和Fisher精确检验比较干预前和干预后的答案。结果:共收集到49对干预前住院医师和47对干预后住院医师。实施干预后,100%的住院医生报告手术目标,而干预前为45%(结论:我们建议在手术暂停时间常规增加教育暂停。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Pause" for Resident Education in the Operating Room.

Objective: To determine if asking residents to discuss their specific learning objectives with the attending physician prior to beginning a surgical case would improve the educational experience in the operating room.

Study design: This was a prospective nonrandomized cohort study utilizing a self-administered questionnaire. Prior to the intervention, residents and attendings were asked to fill out surveys evaluating the educational experience in the operating room. Subsequently, attending physicians were instructed to ask residents at the beginning of the surgery, "What are your goals for this surgical case?" During this intervention period, the same anonymous survey was filled out. Preintervention and postintervention answers were compared by t test and Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 49 preintervention and 47 postintervention resident-attending survey pairs were collected. After implementation of the intervention, 100% of residents reported having surgical goals for the procedure as compared to 45% prior to the intervention (p<0.0001). Additionally, during the intervention residents reported they were better able to maximize learning opportunities and were more satisfied with their participation in the case. Attending physicians were more likely to be aware of resident learning objectives after the intervention.

Conclusion: We propose the routine addition of an educational pause to the surgical time out.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1