临床危险因素不能预测肩难产。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine 生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Joseph G Ouzounian, Lisa M Korst, Michelle Sanchez, Suneet Chauhan, Robert B Gherman, Neisha Opper, Melissa L Wilson
{"title":"临床危险因素不能预测肩难产。","authors":"Joseph G Ouzounian,&nbsp;Lisa M Korst,&nbsp;Michelle Sanchez,&nbsp;Suneet Chauhan,&nbsp;Robert B Gherman,&nbsp;Neisha Opper,&nbsp;Melissa L Wilson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 2 different risk factor models for the prediction of shoulder dystocia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of women with vaginal deliveries at a single institution over an 8-year period. Two distinct multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the occurrence of shoulder dystocia: a traditional model used information based on birthweight and macrosomia, and a clinical model used information based on esti-mated fetal weight and suspected macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,998 deliveries analyzed, there were 221 cases of shoulder dystocia (1.6%). In addition to the macrosomia or suspected macrosomia variables, the final models included prolonged second stage of labor, diabetes status, and oxytocin use. Neither model was highly sensitive or highly specific, and neither demonstrated a cutoff threshold that yielded a clinically viable PPV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the presence of 1 or more risk factors for shoulder dystocia, its occurrence remains largely an unpredictable clinical event.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 11-12","pages":"575-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph G Ouzounian,&nbsp;Lisa M Korst,&nbsp;Michelle Sanchez,&nbsp;Suneet Chauhan,&nbsp;Robert B Gherman,&nbsp;Neisha Opper,&nbsp;Melissa L Wilson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 2 different risk factor models for the prediction of shoulder dystocia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of women with vaginal deliveries at a single institution over an 8-year period. Two distinct multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the occurrence of shoulder dystocia: a traditional model used information based on birthweight and macrosomia, and a clinical model used information based on esti-mated fetal weight and suspected macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,998 deliveries analyzed, there were 221 cases of shoulder dystocia (1.6%). In addition to the macrosomia or suspected macrosomia variables, the final models included prolonged second stage of labor, diabetes status, and oxytocin use. Neither model was highly sensitive or highly specific, and neither demonstrated a cutoff threshold that yielded a clinically viable PPV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the presence of 1 or more risk factors for shoulder dystocia, its occurrence remains largely an unpredictable clinical event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"61 11-12\",\"pages\":\"575-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种不同的危险因素模型对肩难产的预测效果。研究设计:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,在一个机构进行了8年的阴道分娩。使用两种不同的多变量logistic回归模型来评估肩难产的发生:传统模型使用基于出生体重和巨大儿的信息,临床模型使用基于估计胎儿体重和疑似巨大儿的信息。结果:13998例分娩中,肩难产221例(1.6%)。除了巨大儿或疑似巨大儿变量外,最终模型还包括第二产程延长、糖尿病状态和催产素使用。这两种模型都不是高度敏感或高度特异性的,也没有证明产生临床可行的PPV的截止阈值。结论:尽管肩部难产存在1个或多个危险因素,但其发生在很大程度上仍是一个不可预测的临床事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia.

Objective: To compare 2 different risk factor models for the prediction of shoulder dystocia.

Study design: We performed a retrospective study of women with vaginal deliveries at a single institution over an 8-year period. Two distinct multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the occurrence of shoulder dystocia: a traditional model used information based on birthweight and macrosomia, and a clinical model used information based on esti-mated fetal weight and suspected macrosomia.

Results: Of the 13,998 deliveries analyzed, there were 221 cases of shoulder dystocia (1.6%). In addition to the macrosomia or suspected macrosomia variables, the final models included prolonged second stage of labor, diabetes status, and oxytocin use. Neither model was highly sensitive or highly specific, and neither demonstrated a cutoff threshold that yielded a clinically viable PPV.

Conclusion: Despite the presence of 1 or more risk factors for shoulder dystocia, its occurrence remains largely an unpredictable clinical event.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
期刊最新文献
Role of Capecitabine in the Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Drug for Two Settings. Comparison of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Using a Ring-Shaped Loop Versus a Right-Angled Triangular Loop. Gene Expression Analysis Identifies Common and Distinct Signatures Underlying Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancers. Analysis of Related Causes for No Embryos Transferred and Corresponding Coping Measures in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cesarean Section Rates and Clinical Indications at a Large North African Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1