Steven M Yip, Jose M Ruiz Morales, Frede Donskov, Anna Fraccon, Umberto Basso, Brian I Rini, Jae Lyun Lee, Georg A Bjarnason, Hao-Wen Sim, Benoit Beuselinck, Ravindran Kanesvaran, James Brugarolas, Kostas Koutsoukos, Simon Yuen Fai Fu, Takeshi Yuasa, Ian Davis, Ajjai Alva, Christian Kollmannsberger, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng
{"title":"转移性憎色性肾细胞癌(chrRCC)在靶向治疗时代的结局:来自国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)的结果。","authors":"Steven M Yip, Jose M Ruiz Morales, Frede Donskov, Anna Fraccon, Umberto Basso, Brian I Rini, Jae Lyun Lee, Georg A Bjarnason, Hao-Wen Sim, Benoit Beuselinck, Ravindran Kanesvaran, James Brugarolas, Kostas Koutsoukos, Simon Yuen Fai Fu, Takeshi Yuasa, Ian Davis, Ajjai Alva, Christian Kollmannsberger, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng","doi":"10.3233/KCA-160002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in patients with metastatic chromophobe renal cell cancer (chrRCC), a subtype of renal cell carcinoma. <b>Objective:</b> This retrospective series aims to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective data analysis was performed using the IMDC dataset of 4970 patients to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Results:</b> 109/4970 (2.2%) patients had metastatic chrRCC out of all patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy. These patients were compared with 4861/4970 (97.8%) clear cell mRCC (ccRCC) patients. Patients with metastatic chrRCC had a similar OS compared to patients with ccRCC (23.8 months (95% CI 16.7 - 28.1) vs 22.4 months (95% CI 21.4 - 23.4), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0908). Patients with IMDC favorable (18%), intermediate (59%) and poor risk (23%) had median overall survivals of 31.4, 27.3, and 4.8 months, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.028). <b>Conclusions:</b> To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of metastatic chrRCC patients and these results set new benchmarks for survival in clinical trial design and patient counseling. The IMDC criteria risk categories seem to stratify patients into appropriate favourable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, although larger patient numbers are required. It appears that outcomes between metastatic chrRCC and ccRCC are similar when treated with conventional targeted therapies. Patients with metastatic chrRCC can be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and enrolled in clinical trials to further measure outcomes in this rare patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-160002","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma (chrRCC) in the Targeted Therapy Era: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC).\",\"authors\":\"Steven M Yip, Jose M Ruiz Morales, Frede Donskov, Anna Fraccon, Umberto Basso, Brian I Rini, Jae Lyun Lee, Georg A Bjarnason, Hao-Wen Sim, Benoit Beuselinck, Ravindran Kanesvaran, James Brugarolas, Kostas Koutsoukos, Simon Yuen Fai Fu, Takeshi Yuasa, Ian Davis, Ajjai Alva, Christian Kollmannsberger, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/KCA-160002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in patients with metastatic chromophobe renal cell cancer (chrRCC), a subtype of renal cell carcinoma. <b>Objective:</b> This retrospective series aims to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective data analysis was performed using the IMDC dataset of 4970 patients to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. <b>Results:</b> 109/4970 (2.2%) patients had metastatic chrRCC out of all patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy. These patients were compared with 4861/4970 (97.8%) clear cell mRCC (ccRCC) patients. Patients with metastatic chrRCC had a similar OS compared to patients with ccRCC (23.8 months (95% CI 16.7 - 28.1) vs 22.4 months (95% CI 21.4 - 23.4), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0908). Patients with IMDC favorable (18%), intermediate (59%) and poor risk (23%) had median overall survivals of 31.4, 27.3, and 4.8 months, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.028). <b>Conclusions:</b> To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of metastatic chrRCC patients and these results set new benchmarks for survival in clinical trial design and patient counseling. The IMDC criteria risk categories seem to stratify patients into appropriate favourable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, although larger patient numbers are required. It appears that outcomes between metastatic chrRCC and ccRCC are similar when treated with conventional targeted therapies. Patients with metastatic chrRCC can be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and enrolled in clinical trials to further measure outcomes in this rare patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"41-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-160002\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-160002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-160002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
背景:转移性憎色性肾细胞癌(chrRCC)是肾细胞癌的一种亚型,其治疗结果特征不佳。目的:本回顾性研究旨在确定靶向治疗时代转移性chrRCC的治疗结果。方法:使用IMDC数据集对4970例患者进行回顾性数据分析,以确定靶向治疗时代转移性chrRCC的治疗结果。结果:在所有接受靶向治疗的mRCC患者中,109/4970(2.2%)患者为转移性chrRCC。这些患者与4861/4970例(97.8%)透明细胞mRCC (ccRCC)患者进行比较。与ccRCC患者相比,转移性chrRCC患者的OS相似(分别为23.8个月(95% CI 16.7 - 28.1)和22.4个月(95% CI 21.4 - 23.4) (p = 0.0908)。IMDC有利(18%)、中等(59%)和低风险(23%)患者的中位总生存期分别为31.4个月、27.3个月和4.8个月(p = 0.028)。结论:据作者所知,这是最大的转移性chrRCC患者系列,这些结果为临床试验设计和患者咨询的生存设定了新的基准。尽管需要更多的患者,但IMDC标准的风险类别似乎将患者分为适当的有利、中等和低风险组。在接受常规靶向治疗时,转移性chrRCC和ccRCC的预后似乎相似。转移性chrRCC患者可以用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗,并参加临床试验以进一步测量这一罕见患者群体的预后。
Outcomes of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma (chrRCC) in the Targeted Therapy Era: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC).
Background: Treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in patients with metastatic chromophobe renal cell cancer (chrRCC), a subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Objective: This retrospective series aims to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the IMDC dataset of 4970 patients to determine metastatic chrRCC treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Results: 109/4970 (2.2%) patients had metastatic chrRCC out of all patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy. These patients were compared with 4861/4970 (97.8%) clear cell mRCC (ccRCC) patients. Patients with metastatic chrRCC had a similar OS compared to patients with ccRCC (23.8 months (95% CI 16.7 - 28.1) vs 22.4 months (95% CI 21.4 - 23.4), respectively (p = 0.0908). Patients with IMDC favorable (18%), intermediate (59%) and poor risk (23%) had median overall survivals of 31.4, 27.3, and 4.8 months, respectively (p = 0.028). Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest series of metastatic chrRCC patients and these results set new benchmarks for survival in clinical trial design and patient counseling. The IMDC criteria risk categories seem to stratify patients into appropriate favourable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, although larger patient numbers are required. It appears that outcomes between metastatic chrRCC and ccRCC are similar when treated with conventional targeted therapies. Patients with metastatic chrRCC can be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and enrolled in clinical trials to further measure outcomes in this rare patient population.